Letter to The Prime Minister – Stephen Harper and all Provincial – Territory Premiers of Canada, inclusive of The RCMP and others reporting that; Premier of Alberta – Alison Redford- during her reign as Justice Minister / Attorney General of Alberta, Canada participated in concealing corruption within the Edmonton & Calgary Law Courts for which now has set detrimental precedence to all Judicial Jurisdictions within Canada.

BRODERBUCK

Presents

THE BUCK FOR JUSTICE

*************************************

Stephen Harper

 Prime Minister of Canada 

  We will not forget!

November 11, 2012

The Men, Women and Children who lost their lives.

Crosses

Prime Minister – Stephen Harper

you must also remember the living senior citizens for whom were children

during the WAR and provide protection to ensure Canada’s most vulnerable are safe from

Judicial and Health Care Fraud.

The following letter requests that

Prime Minister – Stephen Harper

address the Canadian people regarding the following;

How can it be that you

Mr. Stephen Harper

has knowingly allowed vulnerable seniors

 Donald H. Broder and his wife Joyce M. Broder

for whom were born in Canada to be

  framed, defrauded and falsely incarcerated by

The Alberta Justice Department

conspiring with lawyers and 

 Mr.  Stephen Harper

explain why these white collar criminals

have not been criminally charged by

The Federal Government of Canada – Department of Justice?

The Broder family also made a request for immediate action by

The Federal Government of Canada to

legislate protection and severe punishments for all

Judicial perpetrators that

conspire to defraud, willfully harm and therefore breach

The Constitutional Rights of any and all Canadians equally face 

mandatory editable  criminal offence with severe punishment under

The Criminal Code of Canada

for their willful actions of breaching the

The Canadian  Constitution

and

The Charter of Human Rights

of all  

Canadian Citizen’s

 

“Especially our most vulnerable!”

********************************* 

The Senior Citizens of Canada.

Joyce Broder at the Good Samaritans LodgeDonald H. Broder’s wife Joyce M. Broder for whom the

Alberta Justice Department had garnished her pension money needed to pay the

Good Samaritan’s Home as she was diagnosed with late stage Alzheimer’s.

Joyce M. Broder passed away on September 23, 2011.

Donald H. Broder passed away on April 11, 2012.

and neither of them could have a bank account!

******************************************************************************

Mr. Stephen Harper/ Prime Minister of Canada

*******************************************************************************

” To knowingly allow Corruption within the Canadian Courts

inflict harm against any senior citizen of Canada!”

Mr.  Stephen Harper

“That’s one too many!”

Mr. Stephen Harper

you should follow the lead

Alison Redford

Past Premier of Alberta

Past Attorney General of Alberta

and

Resign Immediately

 **********************

The following 10 page letter to;

***********************************************

Prime Minister Stephen Harper

was mailed October 30, 2012

and c.c to all

he Provincial and Territory

Premier’s of Canada

and others on a

With and Without Prejudice Basis.

*********************************************************

With still no response to this Date of October 6, 2014.

 

The Fifth Estate

The only response receive as of: 12/ 12/ 2012 –

as requested in the letter to;

The Prime Minister of Canada;

Stephen Harper 

 

The evidence before you the reader will prove that;

*************************************************************************************************

Alison Redford-Minister of Justice-Attorney General of Alberta,Canada

willfully ignored that;

The Alberta and Federal Justice Department’s in Canada

were willful participants in a conspiracy by

committing acts of collusion with

Lawyers from Alberta Bar to;

frame, wrongfully convict, incarcerate

and

extort the retirement savings of

an innocent senior citizen

Donald H. Broder.

*****************************************************************************************

The actions of these perpetrators within;

The Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench and Appeal Courts

have now set corruption as precedence in law within all;

Canadian

Provincial Court of Queen’s Bench’s,

Provincial Appeal Court’s

and

The Supreme Court of Canada

*******************************************************************************************

The Case Law

that sets corruption as precedence

is identified below.

****************************************************

STATEMENT

prepared in advance of

April 11, 2012

by;

Donald H. Broder (deceased)

October 11, 1929 – April 11, 2012.

and

Joyce M. Broder (deceased)

December 6, 1929 – September 23, 2011.

The song that was played at Donald H. Broder’s memorial on April 28, 2012.

Neil Young – Old Man – You Tube

www.youtube.com/watch?v=221mohEolWc

TAKE NOTICE

IN DUE COURSE

A  Statement will be provided to;

The Alberta Law Courts,

The Office of Attorney General – Justice Minister of The Province of Alberta

The Office of Attorney General – Justice Minister of  Canada,

The Edmonton and Commercial Crimes Unit

and

The RCMP  – K Division, Province of Alberta

Demanding criminal charges laid immediately

against all these identified perpetrators.

Perfect storm
n
a combination of events which are not individually dangerous, but occurring together produce a disastrous outcome

  “even when you win you lose”

The Chief Justice

A. H. Wachowich

Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore

of

The Law Firm – Weir Bowen 

Bryan Kickham

of

The Law Firm – Miller Thomson

Joseph J. Kueber

of

The Law Firm – Bryan & Company

The following document’s are excerpts from;

The Reasons for Judgment of Justice Myra Bielby;

Issued following the conclusion of the trial held at Edmonton Law Courts from January 19 – 23, 2004 within;

  Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949 – Broder vs. Broder.

 

Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Madam M. B. Bielby (full version)PDF

 

Note: Page 2 – paragraph [2]  is an excerpt from;

The Reasons for Judgment of Justice Bielby explaining that;

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen won the trial based on the relation back doctrine;

because the issue of standing / lack or personal representatives 

had not been raised by the defendant’s post statement of claim.

Quote;

             While the principle of relation back is normally available only in regard to actions taken in advance of the granting of letters of probate by parties named by will as executors, it;applies in this case to save the action because the action was commenced in advance of the granting of Letters of Administration for the purpose of preserving estate assets.”

Note: Page 17 – paragraph [82] is an excerpt from;

The Reasons for Judgment of Justice Bielby.

Quote;

[82] The defendant led evidence from his then counsel, Joseph Kueber to the effect that Mr. Kueber wrote to plaintiff’s counsel in April, 1997 advising that he would advance a limitations defence but neither of his letters expressly raised the issue of the Plaintiffs’ standing to sue at that time which, in any case, was before the original Statement of Claim was filed. Therefore, those letters create no estoppel which would prevent the application of the principle of relation back.

Did you know;

Fact: The Statement of Claim was filed on July 8, 1997 and the Statement of Defence was filed on July 28, 1997  and contained within paragraph 8 the Defendant’s Donald Broder and Craig Broder’s lawyer Joseph Kueber of Bryan & Company raised the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives!

Donald H. Broder’s own lawyer’s Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson and Joseph Kueber of Bryan & Company conspired by acting in collusion  with the Plaintiff’s lawyer Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen to conceal that the issue of standing / lack of personal representatives had been raised by Joseph Kueber of Bryan & Company within the Original Statement of Defence filed on July 28, 1997 and then again within two Post Statement of Claim correspondences issued in October 9 & 27, 1997.

Note:

Evidence will follow with excerpts from Guy Lacourciere’s cross-examination on his affidavit that will prove; 

Donald H. Broder’s  own defence lawyer Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson purposely;

Amended the Statement of Defence on January 9, 2004 to willfully conceal that the first time the issue of standing was raised was within The Original Statement of Defence dated July 28, 1997, then  requested to call Joseph Kueber of Bryan & Company for whom filed The Original Statement of Defence to testify at trial on behalf of  the Defendant’s Donald Broder  and Craig Broder.  Donald Broder was told by way of telephone call from Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson that he was going to lose at trial so Donald H. Broder told Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson that he did need him to lose and fired him on the spot. Then a call was made by Craig Broder prior to the trial to confirm with  Joseph J. Kueber of Bryan & Company that he would still testify and nervously Joseph Kueber could not back out now.  A request was made to Joseph Kueber that he bring the two post Statement of Claim correspondence from October 1997 that raised the issue of the Plaintiff’s standing. Joseph Kueber showed up at trial with the two pre-statement of claim correspondences  dated April 8 & April 24, 1997 to testify to, knowingly they would be irrelevant and did not raise the issue of standing. Joseph Kueber of Bryan and Company was also willfully conspiring with Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson for whom had with willful and purposeful intent had succeeded to conceal the first time the issue of standing was raised was within The Original Statement of Defence and that it also was an issue that had been raised within two correspondences  issued by Joseph Kueber of Bryan & Company  and sent to Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen on October 9 & 27, 1997 after the Statement of Claim was filed on July 8, 1997.

Below are the two irrelevant pre-statement of claim correspondence dated April 8 & 24, 1997 that;

Donald H. Broder’s own lawyers

Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson;

requested that he call

Joseph Kueber of Bryan & Company;

to testify at the trial;

Both lawyers orchestrated the testimony by bring two pre-statement of claim correspondences

dated April 8 &24, 1997

Tab E correspondences dated April 8 and April 24, 1997 (full version)PDF

that did not raise the issue of standing was raised /  lack of Personal Representatives;

 as per

Alberta Rules of Court Rule 129

“that the action is frivolous, vexatious and abuse of court process.”

Knowingly and acting in collusion to frame Donald H. Broder there were

 two post-statement of claim correspondences issued by Joseph Kueber of Bryan & Company;

dated October 9 & 27, 1997

Tab E correspondences dated October 9, and October 27, 1997. (full version)PDF

that raised the issue of standing /  lack of Personal Representatives as per;

Alberta Rules of Court  – Rule 129,

“the action is frivolous, vexatious and abuse of court process”

within the correspondences identified above and dated October 9 & 27 1997.

Did you know!

Had the trial Judge;

Justice Myra Bielby

be aware that;

the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives had been raised within the

Original Statement of Defence

and also in two post Statement of Claim correspondences;

“estoppel would have prevented Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen from relying on the relation back doctrine” 

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen would have lost the trial.

Reference Reasons for Decision of Justice Myra Bielby – Page 17, paragraph [82] below again!

Did you know!

The following three documents are excerpts of

Pages 389, 407 and 408 – taken from Donald H. Broder’s  –

Alberta Court of Appeal Books as prepared by Transcript Management  Arguments.

  Page 389 – is the cover page clarifying the parties present, date and arguments.

 

  Page 407 and 408 – Provided evidence to Alberta Court of Appeal Justices Carole Conrad, Ronald Berger and Peter Costigan that Elizabeth MacInnis had told Justice Bielby that the first time the defendants raised the issue of lack of Personal Representatives was early 2001, when as the fact before you have proven the issue of standing had been raised within the Original Statement of Defence on July 28, 1997 and also within two correspondences issued by Joseph Kueber of Bryan & Company on October 9 & 27, 1997.

 Precedence:

If Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen;

can commit perjury by misleading Justice Myra Bielby as to the first time lack of personal representatives was raised

with no consequences for her actions then the Canadian Justice System is in serious trouble as all parties are now allowed to lie in Court with no consequences.

See the yellow highlights within the document immediately below;

Provides evidence that;

Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen committed perjury;

by telling the trial Judge Justice Bielby the first time the issue of lack of Personal Representatives was raised was early 2001.

             Did you know!

Evidence will be provided that;

   “The issue of standing / lack of personal representatives was raised

by Joseph Kueber of Bryan & Company within;

The Original Statement of Defence filed on July 28, 2001

and then raised again;

within two correspondences written by Joseph Kuiber of Bryan & Company on

October 9 & 27, 1997.”

Cross – Examination of Guy Lacourciere (Full version)PDF

Note:

 As referenced above;

  page 29 lines 10 to 18

within the cross-examination of;

Guy Lacourciere.

Original Statement of Defence (Full version)PDF

That the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives was raised within the Original Statement of Defence.

see paragraph 8 below.

 

 

 

 

 

 Note: Paragraph 8 above; quotes: 

Alberta Rules of Court Rule 129 (1) (b) below and raises the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives.

This next document is the backer page from the Original Statement of Defence and

provides evidence that the first time the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives was raised was on

the filed date of July 28, 1997;

and not as;

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen told the trial Judge Justice Bielby during closing arguments

“early 2001 was the first time the defendants raised the issue of lack of Personal Representatives”

Cross examination evidence of Guy Lacourciere within the transcript above has proven that;

  Alberta Court of Appeal Justices;

Carole Conrad, Ronald Berger and Peter Costigan;

  for whom were on the bench for the Appeal of Justice Bielby`s; Reasons For Judgment

and also

willfully participated in and allowing Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

to commit perjury and frame an innocent senior citizen.                       

These same Justices;

  • Carole Conrad, Ronald Berger and Peter Costigan

also willfully allowed other Justices within the Edmonton  Law Courts to act in collusion with

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen by their intentional biased and prejudiced acts to circumvent;

  •  The Statute of Limitations by adding  new Plaintiffs after the applicable limitation period expired.


Statement of Claim (Full version)PDF

Note: The Original Statement of Claim was filed on;

July 8, 1997

and;

The two year limitation period to add or substitute  new Plaintiffs would be;

July 9, 1999.

During Donald H. Broder’s Appeal and without following the

Alberta Rules of Court with a formal court application

  Justice C. P. Clarke ordered that;

The Personal Representatives could be substituted as Plaintiff’s on;

 September 18, 2001.

” four years after The Original Statement of Claim file date of;

July 8, 1997.

This was all orchestrated by

Justice C. P. Clarke

because

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had been successful

as per her own Court Application

in obtaining a Court Order from

Justice J. L. Lewis

directing the pleadings be closed on February 15, 2001;

  then an extension to close the pleadings was granted to

the Defendant, Donald H. Broder by;

Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich that;

Elizabeth MacInnis must close the pleadings

   on or before March 15, 2001  within;

Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949.

FACT

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

did not file the Certificate of Readiness to close the pleadings until

April 17, 2003.

Did you know!

“Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen must be criminally charged with Contempt of Court for not adhering to;

The Court order to file the Certificate of Readiness on or before March 15, 2001, but later in April of 2004

she had Donald H. Broder incarcerated for not following a 2004 Court Order knowing that

she had lost the litigation if she had followed the 2001 Court Order.

See:

Guy Lacourciere’s cross examination whereby he states that;

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had made the comment she had been ambushed

so it must have been to Justice C. P. Clarke that is why he winked and

substituted the Personal Representatives to the said action

during Donald H. Broder’s appeal as he new;

The Pleadings were closed immediately following the Appeal.

 

Rocklake Inc. vs. Timberjack Corporation

  • Case law supporting
  • That the addition or substitution of new Plaintiffs after the expiration of the ;
  •  applicable 2 year limitation period.
  • is not allowed in Alberta
  • As per Alberta New Limitations Act

Rocklake vs. Timberjack (Full version)PDF

Below are relevant excerpts from Rocklake v. Timberjack

 

 

 

 

Alberta’s New Limitation Act (Full version)PDF

Below are excerpts from Alberta’s New Limitations Act clarifying that adding or substituting a Plaintiffs

is not allowed after the applicable two year limitation period.

 

 

 

 

Did you know!

Justice C. P. Clarke granted Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen leave of the court

to file an Amended Amended Statement of Claim

to add the Personal Representatives as Plaintiff’s

on September 18, 2001

in excess of 3 year after the original Statement of Claim was filed on July 8, 1997.

This was the Defendant’s Donald Broder and Craig Broder’s Appeal

before Justice C. P. Clarke and he was obviously aware that

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had complained about being ambushed

because as per The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Order as per paragraph 4 only the Defendants could

extend the time to file the Certificate of Readiness and the pleadings would be closed immediately following the Appeal before Justice C. P. Clarke

and then Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen would not be able to file a pleading as per The Alberta Rules of Court to seek the addition of new plaintiffs

  for which would not have been allowed because the applicable Limitation Period of 2 years had lapsed.

Justice C. P. Clarke acted bias and prejudiced against the Defendant’s Donald Broder and Craig Broder  by;

circumvented the Alberta Rules of Court to benefit Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen

past Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moores daughter.

 

 

The Amended Amended Statement of Claim filed on November 5, 2001

now included the addition / substitution  of

The Personal Representatives as Plaintiff’s

and the excerpt below is the backer page which demonstrates the amended portion

as the new content  require to be underlined .

Amended Amended Statement of Claim (Full version)PDF

 

Alison Redford

current premier of Alberta,  past Justice Minister – Attorney General

all this criminal activity was reported to  The Crown by

The Edmonton Commercial Crimes Unit

while you were Justice Minister / Attorney General

and this is all you have to say;

 

 

 

 

 

Intermission

Wait a minute one more piece of evidence proving conspiracy by;

Alberta Justice / Transcript Management;

Click on the PDF below of the original

  Opening Statements of Donald H. Broder

as read at the first days of the trial.

The Opening Statements of Donald Broder (Full version)PDF

Note: The following  pages are the cover page and table of contents from Donald H. Broder’s Appeal Books

as prepared by Alberta Justice -Transcript Management Services.

Note: Below is part of the table of contents refer to;

in The Appeal Books as;

PART III –  EVIDENCE

Did you know!

Immediately following The opening statement by Ms. MacInnis should be;

The opening Statement by Donald H. Broder.

” I wonder where they disappeared too!”

Note:

We wrote to Alberta Justice – Transcript Management and;

requested that a complete set of transcripts for the first day of the trial;

be re-transcribed to include Donald H. Broder’s opening statements;

received this response.

Did you know!

When you enter a Law Courts Building in Canada they have signs posted

“no recording devices”

we the Canadian people are to trust that everything  said during court proceedings are

being recorded and safely stored for use when transcripts are required for Appeals.

Donald H. Broder’s opening statement are gone off the audio from the trial tape.

When we reported this to The RCMP in Cochrane, Alberta

we were told by the constable,

“maybe the batteries went dead that run the microphone at the court house!”

This ordeal could be a movie someday,

Better than;

“THE FIRM”

with

Tom Cruise

so get ready for some more good reading

Grab a bowl of popcorn and your favorite soft drink;

and then you the reader will be shown  how;

The Alberta Justice Department incarcerated an innocent senior citizen;

Donald H. Broder

for an orchestrated  false contempt of court charge;

then held him in the;

Edmonton Remand Center for 11 days.

for not following the Trial Judge Justice Bielby’s order  immediately following the trial in 2004;

while as the evidence will prove it was the Plaintiff’s lawyer;

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen that was in contempt of Court for not;

adhering to the Order she had been granted by;

Justice Lewis on the 18th day of December, 2000.

and

The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich the 13th day of February, 2001.

The evidence you will read will prove that Donald  Broder and Craig Broder’s  lawyer;

Robert Sawers of R. J. Sawers and Associates 

had been accused by Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen that he had ambushed her

because she had closed the pleadings on herself on March 15, 2001

within action 9703-12949 before the Application for Probate on May 24, 2001

 if

The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Order had been followed by

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen and she filed the;

Certificate of Readiness on or before March 15, 2001;

she had lost the lawsuit as the Plaintiff’s did not have a right to sue

only Personal Representatives have such a right.

Did you know!

This next document is a certified copy of a Court Order that;

provides evidence of what the Edmonton Law Courts did to;

Donald H. Broder when he did not follow a Court Order;

Did  you know!

Pargraph 4;

Justice Bielby orders that;

an investigation be requested to the Attorney General “Alison Redford at the time for an investigation,

Donald H. Broder and Craig Broder are still waiting for their findings,

our investigation was in preparation to exonerate ourselves

or was The Alberta Justice Department trying to use scare tactics.

If so they did not work!

Did you know!

1) It was Elizabeth MacInnis that did not follow a 2001 Court Order but yet she had Donald H. Broder incarcerated for not following the 2004 court order.

2) The above order also stated that the money was to be deposited in Beresh Depoe Cunningham account, then why was it transferred to Guy Lacourciere’s account in Calgary.

TDtransfertolaccer

 

*******Insert excerpts from Mugford v. Mugford*******

Case Law mugford vs. mugford


 The  follow documentation in their own words will provide evidence that a conspiracy had been orchestrated by;

“The Alberta Justice Department, Justices and Lawyers.”

to frame an innocent 75 year old senior citizen

Donald H. Broder.

Justice Lewis Order (Full version)PDF

Paragraph 5;  above within The Order of Justice Lewis;

set out that The Certificate of Readiness is to be filed by February 15, 2001

The Surrogate Court proceedings will provide evidence that;

1. Robert J. Sawers did not accept service for the Application for Probate he had only agreed to accept a copy of the letters of administration and the application for probate for information purposes for the pending estate litigation because the Certificate of Readiness was to be filed with the Courts on March 15, 2001 which closed the pleadings prior to The Application to appoint Personal Representatives was filed with The Surrogate Courts.

2. Donald Broder was effectively served by Registered Mail the Application for Probate on May 28, 2001

3. The Application for Probate  for the Grant of Administration was before the Edmonton Surrogate Courts on May 24, 2001

4. Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had her legal secretary, Joan C. Hill file a misleading Affidavit of Service based on a note on the file that;  Robert Sawers had received a copy of the Application for Probate.

5. Justice Belzil Ordered the Grant of Administration knowingly and relying on a false Affidavit of Service for the Application for Probate.

6. Robert Sawers warned Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen that he had a number of serious concerns regarding the Order.

7. The Application for Probate was filed at the Surrogate Courts by Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen after she had obtained the Order to close the Pleadings and should not act on behalf of the Beneficiaries because she was now in a conflict position.

Immediately following Master Quinns decision Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen acted in Contempt of Court for not following Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich’s Order to file the Certificate of Readiness and close the pleadings.

An Action was initiated at the Calgary Law Courts as of against Robert J. Sawers in December of 2006, alleging he had accepted service for the Application for Probate and was negligent for not informing Donald H. Broder.

An Affidavit provided by Robert J. Sawers through his solicitor’s Gerald F. Scott, John Pak, and Chris Triggs at Fraser Milner Casgrain whereby swore under oath he did not accept service for the Application for Probate, and that Donald H. Broder was effectively served by registered mail on May 28, 2001, while the Application was a desk application before Justice R. P. Belzil at the Surrogate Courts on May 24, 2001, for whom acted in collusion with Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen by allowing and relying on a False Affidavit of Service within Surrogate Court Action SES03 113567.

Letter dated May 10, 2001 from Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen (full version)PDF

On May 10, 2001, Elizabeth MacInnis informs Robert Sawers she would be serving Donald Broder with the Application for Probate and only provide him with a copy for information purposes.

Grant of Administration(full version)PDF
The application was heard on May 24, 2001, and the Grant of Administration was ordered by Justice R. P. Belzil.

Application for Probate(full version)PDF

This document is from Canada Post and proves Donald Broder was served by Registered Mail for the Application for Probate on May 28, 2001, four days after the Grant of Administration was order by Justice Belzil on May 24, 2001.

Letter dated June 1, 2001 R.J Sawers & Associates (full version)PDF

Attention: Elizabeth E. MacInnis

I was shocked to receive yesterday, a copy of Belzil, J’s order dispensing with the need for Don Broders renunciation. In it, details that representations from counsel were made. Needless to say, I have a number of serious concerns regarding this Order.

Affidavit of Service (Surrogate Matter)(full version)PDF

Quote:

THE DEPONENT SWEARS UNDER OATH THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS WITHIN THE DEPONENT’S KNOWLEDGE AND IS TRUE. WHERE THE INFORMATION IS BASED ON ADVICE OR INFORMATION AND BELIEF. THIS IS STATED.

Joan C. Hill legal legal secretary for Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen swears an Affidavit of Service for The Surrogate Court Application for Probate by relying on a review of a memo to file.

[2] Robert W. Sawers is the Solicitor for the Defendant Don Broder in Action Number 9703-12949 and represents Don Broder in the pending Estate application.

[3] I am informed of a review of a memo to file dated May 15, 2001 the relevant portion of which is attached as Exhibit “B”, from the May 14, 2001 time sheet, the relevant portion which is attached as Exhibit “C” and by Elizabeth M. MacInnis and do verify believe that Mr. Sawers advised Elizabeth M. MacInnis on May 14th, 2001 that he had received a copy of the Application for the Grant of Administration which was sent to him.

Robert J. Sawers Affidavit(full version)PDF

  • [7.] On or about May 10, 2001, counsel for the plaintiffs In the Queen’s Bench Action, Elizabeth Maclnnis of Weir Bowen LLP (MacInnis), filed an application with the Surrogate Court of Alberta, being Court file No. SES113S67, tor a Grant of Administration of the Estate of Edmund Broder (the “Surrogate Court Action”) A copy of the procedure record for the Surrogate Court Action, which my counsel advises and I verily believe is a true copy of the procedure record received from the court, is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit 5.
  • [8.] Maclnnis served Donald Broder with a copy of the required Notice to Beneficiary and of the Application for Grant of Administration, via registered mail, but Donald Broder did not receive these documents until on or about May 28, 200t. A copy of an affidavit sworn by Donald Broder on October 16, 2001, and subsequently filed in the Surrogate Court Action, in which he deposes to his receipt of the Notice, is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit 6.
  • [9.] Maclnnis provided me with a copy of the letter and documents served on Donald Broder, which I received on or about May 15, 2001. However, at that time I was not counsel for Donald Broder in the Surrogate Court Action, and did not believe that service would be effective on Donald Broder until he himself received the documents. A copy of Maclnnis’ May 10, 2001 letter, providing me with a copy of the Notice to Beneficiary and Application for Grant of Administration being served on Donald Broder, is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit 7.
  • [11.] I represented Don Broder in the Surrogate Court Action beginning at some point in time on or after May 28,2001.

Robert Sawers was counsel for Donald Broder and Craig Broder in action 9703-12949 and because the Pleadings were ordered closed by the Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich prior to the Application for Probate and as such was not in a legal position to accept service for the Pending Estate Litigation / Application for Probate.

Did you know!

Joan C. Hill

legal secretary for Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen

should be charges with swearing a false Affidavit of service

for the Surrogate Court Application

Elizabeth MacInnis was in breach of The Legal Profession Act, acting in conflict of interest as she would now be representing all the Beneficiaries inclusive of Donald Broder for whom she had just made the comment his Lawyer, Robert J. Sawers had ambushed her.

For Service to be Effective for the Application for Probate it had to be directly served on all Beneficiaries inclusive of Donald Broder, and could not be served on Robert Sawers because the Pleadings were closed within Action 9703-12949 for which he was acting on behalf of Donald Broder and Craig Broder.

I, Donald Broder have provided the evidence to you the reader, Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen did not file the Certificate of Readiness as per Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich’s Order on or before March 15, 2001 but rather waited until April 17, 2003, clearly acting in Contempt of Court and committed Fraud on the Courts by filing a false Affidavit of Service for the Application for Probate.

Did you know!

Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore had;

Donald H. Broder incarcerated for;

not following the trial Judge Justice Bioelby’s Order in 2004

while she new she had not followed the Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich order from 2001;

for which if she had obeyed the Order there would have been no trial

as the pleadings were closed before she applied for probate.

Should you the reader wish to send a private and confidential e mail to the family of Donald H. Broder please reply to; bro_kin@telus.net

 

Paragraph 2;

The Order of The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich

” for which has never been followed to date”

set out that the time allowed in Justice Lewis order to file The Certificate of Readiness is extended to March 15, 2001.

Immediately following;

The Biography of Alison Redford

 evidence will be provided that it was;

Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen that;

was in contempt of Court by not;

filing the Certificate of Readiness as per the time frame of March 15, 2001 as;

order by

Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich but rather waited until April 17, 2003;

to file the Certificate of Readiness.

Did you know!

The Alberta Court of Appeal Justices;

Carole Conrad, Ronald Berger and Peter Costigan

were shown;

The Original Statement of Defence that raised the issue of standing;

The Statement of Defence to The Amended Amended Statement of Claim;

that plead Estoppel

The Amended Statement of Defence

that was purposely filed 10 days before the trial to conceal;

The Original Statement of Defence from The Trial Judge

that raised the issue of standing on July 28, 1997

and

Closing Arguments by Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

where she committed perjury when answering to Justice Bielby

as to the first time the defendant’s raised the issue of

lack of Personal Representatives as being early 2001.

Did you know!

  • The Alberta Court of Appeal Justices;
  •  Carole Conrad, Ronald Berger and Peter Costigan
  • willfully chose to ignore and also act in collusion by allowing the;

Conspiracy that framed an innocent senior citizen and upheld Justice Bielby’s Reasons for Judgment

that had taken place prior to the trial by Donald H. Broder’s own lawyers;

Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson and Joseph Kueber of Bryan & Company:

purposely colluding  to conceal the first time the issue of standing – lack of Personal Representatives was raised to assist

the Plaintiffs lawyer, Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

to ensure that;

estoppel would not prevent her from being able to rely on the relation back doctrine

and be successful in winning the trial of;

Alberta Court of Queens Bench action 9703-12949.

 

 

  1. Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich and Justice Lewis allowing Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen to apply for probate then rely on a false affidavit of service within Surrogate Court application for probate after the deadline set out by way of  Court Order to file The Certificate of Readiness that she was granted by Justice Lewis to close the pleadings on herself within action 9703-12949 on herself.
  2. Justice C. P. Clarke allowing Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen to substitute The Personal Representatives as new Plaintiff`s within action 9703-12949 without a formal court application as per The Alberta Rules of Court but instead  during Donald H. Broder`s Alberta Rules of Court Rule 129 appeal challenging the issue of standing or in this case lack of Personal Representatives  because Justice C. P. Clarke was made aware that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen could not extend the time to file the Certificate of Readiness and that the pleadings were  closed immediately following the Appeal before him.
  3. Justice C. P. Clarke and Justice Myra Bielby allowing Elizabeth MacInnis to circumvented the Statute of Limitations for which the two year deadline had lapsed to add or substitute a new Plaintiff `The Personal Representatives“within Alberta Court of Queen`s Bench Action 9703-12949.
  4. Alberta Appeal Court Justices; Carol Conrad, Ronald Berger and Peter Costigan being made aware that Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson had obtained a Fiat `permission to amend“ then Amended Donald H. Broder`s Statement of Defence on January 9, 2004 backdated it to January 9, 2003 and forged the Judges second signature to willfully conceal that the issue of standing – lack of Personal Representatives had been raised within The Original Statement of Defence.
  5. Alberta Appeal Court Justices; Carol Conrad, Ronald Berger and Peter Costigan being made aware that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had committed purgery during the closing arguments of the trial on January 23, 2004 when asked by the trial Judge Justice Myra Bielby as to the first time the Defendant Donald H. Broder had raised the issue of lack of Personal Representatives .

Biography of:

Alison Merrilla Redford

Born: “March 7, 1965”


March 13, 2008, after being elected MLA for the constituency of Calgary-Elbow, Alison Redford was named Minister of Justice and Attorney General on March 13, 2008 by Premier Ed and stepped down February 16, 2001 to take a run for the leadership race of The Progressive Conservative Party to replace Ed Stelmach as Premier.

Alison Redford won the Progressive Conservative Government leadership race to replaced Premier Ed Stelmach on October 2, 2011. Alison Redford was sworn in as Alberta’s 14th Premier at the Alberta Legislature in Edmonton, Alberta Canada on October 7, 2011. On March 26, 2012, Redford met with Lieutenant Governor Don Ethell, who dissolved the current legislature and call an election for April 23, 2012. On April 23, 2012 Alison Redford won a majority Government by taking 67 of the 87 seats in the provincial legislature and is the current Premier of Alberta.

This page of the Buck For Justice website will expose;

The true biography of Alison Redford during her reign as;

Minister of Justice – Attorney General

 March 13, 2008 – February 16, 2011.

The “Crown” was made aware in November 2008  of the conspiracy that had taken place against an innocent 75 year old senior citizen; ” Donald H. Broder ” by providing The Edmonton Economic Commercial Crime Unit documentary evidence of’ a crime that had taken place by Lawyers committing;  Fraud, Perjury, Backdating Documents, Forging Judges Signatures and Audio Deleted from Trial Tapes referred to within this page and the Crown refused to lay Criminal Charges.

Alison Redford Minister of Justice – Attorney General  “The Crown”  Court Documents, transcripts from The Alberta Justice Department and producible records obtained through litigation’s against and transcripts from cross examination of Lawyers providing evidence the Justice Department, Justices and Lawyers conspired to orchestrate and frame Donald H. Broder within Alberta Court of Queens Bench Action 9703-12949.

In 2009 Evidence was provided to Detective Mark Johnson at The Edmonton Economic Commercial Crimes Unit identifying the following;

Cross-Examination of Guy Lacourciere(full version)PDF –  “excerpts will be quoted from the cross-examination throughout this page”

Did you know!

Alison Redford was the Minister of Justice  – Attorney General of Alberta “March 13, 2008 – February 16, 2011” and now is the Premier of Alberta for whom was informed by the Edmonton Economic Commercial Crimes Unit that;

  • .. ..  It was Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen that did not follow a February 13, 2001 Court Order granted by the  The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich but later had Donald H. Broder imprisoned at The Edmonton Remand Center for 11 days for not following a February 2004  Court Order granted by the trial Judge Madame Justice Bielby following the orchestrated trial for which was held at the Edmonton, Alberta Law Courts January 19 – 23, 2004.

1) The Plaintiffs Lawyer “Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen” adverse to Donald H. Broder obtained a Court Order to close the Pleadings before she had applied for Probate then made the comment she had been ambushed by Donald H. Broder’s Lawyer Robert J. Sawers. Elizabeth MacInnis then proceeded to ignored the Court Order when Donald H. Broder’s Lawyer Robert Sawers informed her that only Personal Representatives had the right to sue on behalf of a deceased for which at the time probate had not been applied for at the Surrogate Courts and the Personal Representatives did not exist.

In 2009 – Detective Mark Johnson of The Edmonton Commercial Crimes made “The Crown – Alison Redford Justice Minister – Attorney General”  aware that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had committed fraud on the Courts and to date Alison Redford has allowed precedence to be set that Court Orders do not have to be followed.

Donald H. Broder denied consent to the filing of The Amended Statement of Claim and The Certificate of Readiness. In December 2000 Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen made a Court Application and obtained a Court Order from Justice Lewis to file the Amended Statement of Claim in the form attached and a deadline to file the Certificate of Readiness and close the pleadings of February 15, 2001 allowing time for Donald H. Broder’s Lawyer Robert J. Sawers to make a jury trial application. Donald H. Broder was fined $500.00 on each count for not consenting and had to pay $1,000.00 forthwith.

Justice Lewis Order(full version)PDF

On behalf of Donald H. Broder – Robert J. Sawers made the jury trial application before Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich for whom had just replaced past Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore the Father of Elizabeth MacInnis – Moore of Weir Bowen. Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich denied the application to be tried by Jury and extended the time to file the Certificate of Readiness to March 15, 2001 for Donald H. Broder to make a #129 Application, the action was frivolous, vexatious and abuse of Court process the plaintiffs lacked standing as only personal representatives had the right to bring on an action within the Courts on behalf of a deceased. Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich became aware that there would be no need for a jury the action would be struck as no Personal Representatives had been appointed by the Surrogate Courts prior to the Pleadings being forced closed by Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen.

Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Order (full version)PDF

Note: Paragraph 4 of The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Order states;

4. ” The Defendants have leave to re-attend upon the Chief Justice or any Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench for the purpose of extending the time in paragraph 2 and 3 herein.”

Did you know!

 Donald Broder and Craig Broder; the defendant’s within action 9703-12949 did not re-attend before any Justice of the Courts to extend the time to file The Certificate of Readiness.

During this case management meeting on May 7, 2003 Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen took it upon herself to extend the time and confirm that a Conditional Certificate of Readiness had been filed on April 17, 2003, knowingly that she had made an application and was successful in being granted by way of Court Order that The Certificate of Readiness was to be filed on or before March 15, 2001. The two Lawyers involved Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen and Donald Broder’s own Lawyer Guy Lacourciere had played  the case management Judge; Justice Marceau.

Case Management Meeting Minutes(full version)PDF

 

Alison Redford

you have been made aware that

precedence has now been set in Law that if;

The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Court order has never been  followed 

NO COURT ORDERS HAVE TO BE FOLLOWED!

Alison Redford;

read what

Elizabeth MacInnis – Moore  of Weir Bowen had

The Alberta Department of Justice  do to

Donald H. Broder for not following a Court Order

when it was Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

that was in contempt of Court for not following a previous court order!

Alison Redford;

This next correspondence is all you have to say to

Donald H. Broder’s family;

Why is it you will not have Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

criminally charged for contempt of Court and

incarcerated until she pays back the family of

Donald H. Broder for defrauding him?


Donald H. Broder did not ask you to “interfere with matters judicially decided by the courts”, what he requested was that; The Crown Prosecutors Office lay Criminal Charges against Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen for Perjury, Fraud on the Courts and Obstruction of Justice.

Litigation brought against Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen at Calgary Law Courts before Master Prowse then Appealed before  Justice Karen Horner both refused to enforce The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Court Order for which was brought down against Donald H. Broder at the Edmonton Law Courts for which the closing of the pleadings was initiated by Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen for which she did not file The Certificate of Readiness on March 15, 2001.

We will continue to repeat ourselves as we have for the last 10 years requesting that;

The Alberta Law Courts uphold The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Order to file The Certificate of Readiness on or before March 15, 2001.;

 Justice Karen Horner would not enforce Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich order so now precedence has been set that all Court Order’s  have no merit and do not need to be followed.

*********To all Provincial Premiers and the Prime Minister of Canada**********

Alberta Court of Queen;s Bench Action 9703-12949 – Broder vs. Broder provides ;

 case law that can be relied upon in any provincial jurisdiction

 that Court Orders do not have to be followed.


Please acknowledge that precedence has now been written in stone and

now has become law in Canada;

The Canadian Justice System can grant, pronounce, write and file with the Clerk of the Court a

useless piece of paper called a;

Court Order

that cannot be enforced until; 

The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Order within Action 9703-12949 is enforced and

criminal charges laid against all the Lawyers for whom conspired to frame an innocent senior citizen.

**************More to come!****************

 ” The documentation of what Elizabeth MacInnis did to Donald H. Broder when he did not follow a Court Order.”

 

Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore the proud father of  Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore.

Appointed Associate Chief Justice, April 29, 1981 and Chief Justice, February 24, 1984, of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta; continued in position until December 2000.

W. Kenneth Moore, C.M., Q.C., LL.D.

“Ken’s lengthy and unique list of accomplishments includes his service as former Chief Justice for the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta and, earlier, as a professional football player and an active participant in civic activities. Ken continues his work as a dedicated community member including more than 35 years working in various leading capacities with the Calgary Exhibition & Stampede.”

Counsel
(403) 260-0382
wkm@bdplaw.com
Download vCard

PRACTICE FOCUS

  •  Mediation and Arbitration
    • since May, 2001 successfully completed over 100 mediations and 20 arbitrations involving parties such as the City of Calgary, City of Edmonton, Walter Construction, Telus, NorthwestTel, Governments of Northwest Territories and Nunavut, Enmax and TransAlta

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

  • Practised law for 20 years prior to appointment to the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta

YEAR OF BAR CALL

  • Queen’s Counsel 1967
  • Alberta 1953

EDUCATION

  • University of Alberta, Bachelor of Laws, 1952
  • University of Alberta, Bachelor of Arts, 1949

JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS

  • Appointed Justice of the Supreme Court of Alberta (Trial Division), January 20,1972
  • Appointed Associate Chief Justice, April 29, 1981 and Chief Justice, February 24, 1984, of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta; continued in position until December 2000

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS & OTHER ACTIVITIES

  • Honourary Campaign Chair, University of Calgary Faculty of Law Campaign I&II, 1994 and  1999-2000
  • Member, Board of Directors of the Naval Museum of Alberta, 1999 to 2008, Chairman 2006-2008
  • Volunteer Calgary Exhibition & Stampede, 1964-present (President, 1982, Vice-President, 1978-1981, Director, 1969-1982, Chairman, Grandstand Attractions Committee, 1969-1972, Chairman, Special Projects Committee, 1973)
  • President ,Calgary Golf & Country Club, 1976-1978
  • Associate Director Calgary Stampeder Football Club, 6 years
  • Volunteer, 1988 Winter Olympic Games, VIP Committee
  • Member, International Relations Strategy Group – Canada 2005 Bid Committee, 1997-1998
  • Member, Board of Governors of St Mary’s College, 2000-2005

AWARDS, FELLOWSHIPS & OTHER RECOGNITION

  • Legal:
    • Honourary Bencher of The Law Society of Alberta, November, 2000 Honorary National Member
    • Distinguished Service Award 2000 – presented by the  Law Society of Alberta & the Canadian Bar Association for contributions made to the legal profession, legal scholarship and community
    • Honorary Member Legal Archives Society Alberta, November 2000 to present
    • University of Calgary established the W.K. Moore Alumni Award in 2000, presented annually to recognize outstanding alumni
    • Calgary Legal Guidance established the The Chief Justice Moore Student Fund in 2000 in support of CLG’s student programs
    • Received Honorary Doctor of Laws Degree from the University of Alberta, 1988 and from the University of Calgary, 1999
    • Appointed Honorary Professor of Law, University of Calgary, 1994
    • Appointed Queen’s Counsel, 1967
  • Community:
    • Recipient, Of Order of Canada, 2007
    • Honorary Member of the Judge Walsh Alaberta Seniors Golf Association, 2005
    • Recipient Queen’s Golden Jubilee Medal, 2003
    • Fellowship of the Calgary Scout Foundation 1991 and awarded Service Pin for 30 years of service to Scouting in Canada, 1996
    • Awarded Governor General Commemorative Medal, 1993
    • Named Paul Harris Fellow by the Rotary Foundation of Rotary International, May, 1992
    • Inductee, University of Alberta Sports Wall of Fame, November 1, 1988
    • Honorary Member, Alberta Boy Scouts, 1987 to present

MILITARY SERVICE & RELATED INVOLVEMENT

  • Royal Canadian Navy, 1944 to 1945
  • Recipient of CVSM and clasp, war medal and Atlantic Star
  • Canadian Officers Training Corps, 1948 to 1949
  • Commissioned Lieutenant, attached to Judge Advocate General Department, Western Command, Edmonton, 1951
  • Member of Sharing Our Military Heritage Campaign to establish a centre for combining Navy, Army and Air Force Museums, 2001 to present

SPORTS

  • Member, Alberta Golden Bears Football team, 1946-1948
  • Member, Edmonton Eskimo Football team, 1949-1950
  • Member, Calgary Stampeder Football team, 1946 and 1952

 

Practice Areas

Mediation & Arbitration

What Chief Justice W. Kenneth bragging board does not tell you;

  • Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen is The past Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moores daughter.
  • Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich replaced Chief Justise W. Kenneth Moore on December 2000.
  • Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich  granted the Order on February 13, 2001 for which Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen has never adhered to.
  • Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore made the comment that she had been ambushed after she had obtained a Court Order directing The Certificate of Readiness to be filed prior to making the application for probate to appoint Personal Representatives as they had to be the Plaintiff’s and without them her clients  did not have standing to sue Donald H. Broder.

 

Chief Justice Wachowich steps down

Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich

After more than 34 years as a judge, including the last eight years as chief justice of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, Allan H. Wachowich has decided to step down.

Wachowich has tendered to the minister of justice his resignation as chief justice effective Oct. 1, 2009, a release stated Thursday.

After that, Wachowich will continue to sit as a supernumerary judge until his compulsory retirement from the Court of Queen’s Bench in March 2010.

Was Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich ordered to step down?

Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore ” the father of Elizabeth MacInnis was replaced by Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich in December of 2000, denied Donald Broder’s application for a Jury trial in February 2001 and by way of Court Order extended the time for the Certificate of Readiness to be file on or before March 15, 2001 for which was never followed by Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen but later in 2004 had Donald H. Broder incarcerated for not following a Court Order. With the help of many legal professionals the evidence you are about to read below was exposed by Donald H. Broder in November 2008, then coincidentally Wachowich is retired on October 1, 2009.

 

The Canadian Judicial System and Provincial Law Courts throughout Canada now cannot enforce any Court Orders until the Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Order is enforced within Broder vs. Broder  – Action 9703-12949  

Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Order  (full version)PDF

The next PDF will prove when the Certificate of Readiness was actually filed;

Case Management Meeting Minutes (full version)PDF

All Canadian citizens with Court Orders against them can use Broder vs. Broder Action no: 9703- 12949 as precedence and tell the Courts that Court Orders have no merit and if they chose not to follow the  Court Order they cannot be charged with contempt of Court until;

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen is formally charged with Contempt of Court, Fraud on the Courts, Purgery and Obstruction of Justice  to re-establish a non prejudicial Judicial System in Canada.

Alison Redford needs to act now and instruct The Crown Prosecutors Office lay criminal charges against Elizabeth MacInnis immediately.

Alison Redford Minister of Justice – Attorney General was made aware by the Edmonton Commercial Crimes Unit in 2009 that Elizabeth MacInnis – Moore did not follow the Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Court Order and file the Certificate of Readiness on or before March 15, 2001, if MacInnis had followed the Court Order she had lost the lawsuit because after the Pleading are closed she could not create standing and act on behalf of the Estate at the Surrogate Courts to appoint Personal Representatives or substitute the Personal Representatives as Plaintiffs within the said action 9703-12949.

Official Transcripts of Donald Broders false contempt charge April 23, 2004(full version)PDF “read the yellow highlites

As contained within the; Official Transcripts of Donald Broders false contempt charge April 23, 2004; Detective Mark Johnson of the Edmonton Commercial Crimes Unit made “The Crown – Alison Redford – Minister of Justice – Attorney General” aware that Elizabeth MacInnis – Moore of Weir Bowen had Donald H. Broder imprisoned for not following the 2004 Court Order when as the facts have been presented it was Elizabeth MacInnis – Moore of Weir Bowen that did not follow the earlier February 13, 2001 Court order of The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich to file The Certificate of Readiness on or before March 15, 2001.

Corruption sets Precedence

  •   Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich’s Court Order was not worth the paper it was written on then now precedence has been set in law that  all Court Orders do not count, although Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had Donald H. Broder imprisoned for 11 days in the Edmonton Remand Center for not following a 2004 Court Order.  Donald Broder’s wife Joyce Broder  eventually succumbed to the demands of the Court and turned over $235,000.00 cdn. to Guy Lacourciere of Lacourciere Associates for whom turned the money over to Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen when their was another Court Order the money was to be turned over to Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham, Donald H. Broder’s criminal Lawyer, for whom was also aware his client was being framed and did nothing but milk him for tens of thousands of dollars pretending to defend him on a false contempt of court charge.
Toronto Dominion Bank, Olds Alberta transfer $235,000 to Guy Lacourcieres Canada Trust Account in Calgary(Full Version)PDF
  • Alison Redford – Minister of Justice – Attorney General you were made while you were Minister of Justice – Attorney General

that these innocent seniors were framed by their own Lawyers and Justices  and now they are deceased.

Their valor, courage and dignity will prevail.

They shall be remembered for their fight against

corruption and terrorism

within the Alberta Judicial System.

    Donald H. Broder

“October 11, 1929 – April 11, 2012”

Joyce M. Broder

“December 6, 1929 – September 23, 2011

celebrating their retirement in 1987,

“little did they know that their own Lawyers and Alberta Justice would frame them from 1997 until their death”

then passed away with garnishees on their bank accounts and without being exonerated.

  •  Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen committed perjury when asked by the trial Judge Madame Justice Myra Bielby during closing arguments on January 23, 2004 “when was the first time Donald Broder’s lawyer raised the issue of lack of Personal Representatives?”

Elizabeth M. MacInnis

 

Closing Arguments by Ms. MacInnis(partial version)PDF

Quoted:  from the Alberta Court of Appeal Books, page numbered 389, 407, 408 and exact wording from the document referenced “Closing Arguments by Ms. MacInnis”

Page 389 portions thereof.

January 23rd, 10:00 a.m. session

Justice Bielby

*Arguments by Ms. MacInnis

Page 407 portions thereof;

Line 30

THE COURT: When is the first time the defendants raised the issue of the lack of personal representatives?

Line 35 & 40

MS. MACINNIS: The application was heard in April of 2001, and I think we were first told about it in around January or February of that year. I could check the correspondences to confirm that for sure. I know it was raised when the defendants made application for a jury trial in February of 2001, and he set deadline in which time they had to make the application.

Line 45

THE COURT: Okay. So the first time, even in correspondence to you as counsel for the plaintiffs that this issue was raised, was in early 2001?

Page 408 portions thereof;

Ms. MACINNIS: That’s correct, My Lady. I can say that.

Cross-Examination of Guy Lacourciere May 26,2010 (Full version) PDF

The excerpts of page 1, 28 and 29  below of The Cross Examination of Guy Lacourciere were provided to The Edmonton Commercial Crimes Unit that provided proof that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had committed purgery when asked by Justice Bielby;

THE COURT: When is the first time the defendants raised the issue of the lack of personal representatives?

THE COURT: Okay. So the first time, even in correspondence to you as counsel for the plaintiffs that this issue was raised, was in early 2001?

Ms. MACINNIS: That’s correct, My Lady. I can say that.

Did you know!

The facts will show that the first time the issue of lack of personal representatives was raised was in the original statement of defence filed on July 28, 1997.

Did you know!

Alison Redford was the Minister of Justice  – Attorney General of Alberta “March 13, 2008 – February 16, 2011” and now is the Premier of Alberta for whom was informed by The Edmonton Economic Commercial Crimes Unit that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen committed perjury when asked by the trial Judge; Justice Bielby as to the first time the issue of Lack of Personal Representatives was raised.

Alison Redford  – Justice Minister – Attorney General sent this correspondence via e mail after she was informed of the criminal acts by Justices and Lawyers;

The Edmonton Commercial Crimes Unit sent this  correspondence  after all this documentary evidence of; Elizabeth MacInnis not following The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Court Order and also committing purgery when ask by the trial Judge Justice Bielby as to the first time Donald H. Broder raised the issue of lack of Personal Representatives, Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson backdating the FIAT on The Amended Statement of Defence and forging judges  signatures and that audio from the trial tapes was deleted was provided in these exact documents to their detachment in Edmonton, Alberta.

 

Then we received this e mail from Detective Mark Johnson just before his last day as a police officer!


Did you know!

Alison Redford was the Minister of Justice  – Attorney General of Alberta “March 13, 2008 – February 16, 2011” and now is the Premier of Alberta for whom was informed by The Edmonton Economic Commercial Crimes Unit that;

The reason Justice Myra Bielby would not have seen the Original Statement of Defence during the trial was because Donald H. Broder had retained Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson to act on his behalf after Guy Lacourciere quit. Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson requested a retainer of excess of $15,000 t0 prepare for trial for which was paid by Donald H. Broder, then Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson immediately went to work against his own client and Amended The Statement of Defence knowingly that the Amended Statement of Defence would take total precedence at trial and the Original Statement of Defence and the Statement of Defence to the Amended Statement of Claim would not be made available for the trial Judge review.

 

Bryan Kickham

partner at The Law Firm of

Miller Thomson

in Edmonton, Alberta

Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson for whom represented Donald H. Broder  and filed; The Amended the Statement of Defence on January 9, 2004.

Below are excerpts from the Amended Statement of Defence.

Excerpts of the first page of the Amended Statement of Defence as prepared and filed with Edmonton Law Courts January 9, 2004 just 10 days before the scheduled trial of January 19 – 23, 2004.

  • The first except is from; “The Amended Statement of Defence” and proves the; Action #, Parties and that the word Amended was added as anything that has been added that is new must be underlined as per Alberta Rules of Court and proves the FIAT “permission to amend” was backdated to January 9, 2003, and Justice Breitkreuz second signatures was forged.

Amended Statement of Defence (full version PDF) to confirm the jpeg excerpts below.

 

The FIAT added to the front page of the Amended Statement of Claim by Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson was backdated by one calendar year to ensure that the trial Judge would not be aware the word Amended was added to the Statement of Defence 10 days before the trial. Forgery and Fraud was brought to the Crown’s attention and Alison Redford Justice Minister – Attorney General at the time refused to have the Edmonton Commercial Crimes Unit lay criminal charges against Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson.

amended statement of defence 2

inclusive of Procedure Record Print page 11 (Partial version page 11) PDF

Right below are blown up Jpegs of the relevant portions of page 11 of the Procedural Record Print which provides evidence when the FIAT “permission to amend the Statement of Defence was granted on January 9, 2004 and not January 9, 2003 as written on the Statement of Defence

Cross – Examination of Guy Lacourciere (Full version PDF)

The excerpts of page 1, 41, 42 and 43  below of The Cross Examination of Guy Lacourciere were provided to The Edmonton Commercial Crimes Unit that provided proof that Bryan Kickham willfully Amended The Statement of Defence to conceal from the trial Judge Justice Bielby that the issue of standing – lack of Personal Representatives had been raised within the Original Statement of Defence to orchestrate the outcome of this litigation in favor Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen;

 

 

 

Did you know!  

Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson was retained by Donald H. Broder in November of 2003 as his defence lawyer and immediately upon receiving excess of $15,000 retainer to prepare for trial went to work for the Plaintiff’s counsel Elizabeth MacInnis – Moore of Weir Bowen by orchestrating that his own client Donald H. Broder be framed by; filing the Amended Statement of Defence, backdating the FIAT by one calendar year “January 9, 2003” to ensure it was not obvious to the trial Judge it had just be amended 10 days before schedule date of the trial “January 19, 2004” and forging the Judges second signature.

Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson had to get the word Amended on the Statement of Defence to assist Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen, knowingly that the Original Statement of Defence and the Statement of Defence to the Amended Amended Statement of Claim would not have to be shown to the trial judge and they could conceal the first time the issue of standing – lack of Personal Representatives was raised was within paragraph 8 of The Original Statement of Defence.

Corruption sets Precedence

Joseph J Kueber

partner at The Law Firm

Bryan & Company

in Edmonton Alberta

Joseph J. Kueber of Bryan & Company for whom represented Donald H. Broder and filed;  The Original Statement of Defence on July 28, 1997.

Bryan Kickham requested to call Joseph J. Kueber to testify at the trial and this is the comment Justice Bielby made in her Reasons for Judgment about Joseph Kueber’s testimony.

 

 

Original Statement of Defence

Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson for whom represented Donald H. Broder  and filed; The Amended the Statement of Defence on January 9, 2004.

Amended Statement of Defence

Did you know!

During the cross examination of Guy Lacourciere he is asked questions that are answered by him that provided evidence of how Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson and Joseph Kueber of Bryan & Company for whom were all legal counsel for Donald H. Broder  but then chose to willfully conspire to conceal the first time Alberta Rules of Court  -Rule # 129, frivolous, vexatious and abuse of court process for which raised the issue the plaintiffs lacked standing as they were not appointed by The Surrogate Courts as Personal Representatives of the deceased Edmund Broder so that Estoppel would not prevent the Plaintiffs Lawyer Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen from relying on The Relation Back Doctrine to win the litigation.

Cross-Examination of Guy Lacourciere May 26,2010

 

 The balance of this tab is still under construction.

Contact was made with Calgary Commercial Crimes and as per the instructions from the Intake Officer Detective Stangle we called The Edmonton Commercial Crimes Unit and made an appointment at which time we were interviewed and reviewed all the documentation with Detective Mark Johnson  an received the  following responses. It was the Edmonton Commercial Crimes unit that identified that Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson had framed is own client with the evidence before them that the Fiat had been back dated by one calendar year  ” see the Procedure Record Print for the correct date of the FIAT” and the second Judges signature had been forged on the Fiat stamp on Donald Broder’s Amended Statement of Defence.

Amended Statement of Defence (partial version) PDF

Procedure Record Print (partial version)PDF

Edmonton Commercial Crime Unitemail response. (full version)PDF

Edmonton Commercial Crimes correspondence dated June 1, 2010 re: criminal charges against lawyers.  (full version)PDF

The RCMP in Sundre, Alberta called The RCMP in  Olds, Alberta and requested that they have a constable call Donald Broder, Constable Boles called and we have been into the detachment numerous times requesting criminal charges be laid against the Lawyer involved as the crime took place in Olds because Guy Lacourciere of Lacourciere Associates had $235,000 transferred from Donald Broder’s wife Joyce Broder’s Toronto Dominion bank account while Donald Broder was falsely imprisoned between April 26 – May 7, 2004.

As per the request of Constable Boles the money trail  was provided along with the criminal content of the documentation that provided evidence of conspiracy, purgery and fraud.

Toronto Dominion Bank, Olds Alberta transfer $235,000 to Guy Lacourcieres Canada Trust Account in Calgary.  (full version)PDF 

Statement to the RCMP by Donald Broder (full version)PDF

 

To you the reader all information provided is proof beyond any doubt corruption is running rampant within

 The Canadian Provincial Courts.

This Website is dedicated to all Canadian Citizens.

All allegations against the Alberta Justice Department are proven by; 

  excerpts taken from transcripts, court filed document and correspondences.

*************************************************************************************************************************************************

“Simply put we have designed the website so these Judicial thieves convict themselves!”

**************************************************************************************************************************************************

We Have Achieved Our Mission

for the benefit of future generations of Canada

and also

On Behalf of Canada’s most Vulnerable

 Senior Citizens

children, disabled, mentally challenged

and all 

Canadian Families. 

************************************* 

© 2011-2012 Broder Buck All Rights Reserved

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Contact us: info@broderbuck.com
Copyright © 2016 - 2017 Broder Buck. All Rights Reserved. Created by Blog Copyright.

Copyright © 2016 - 2017 Broder Buck. All Rights Reserved. Created by Blog Copyright.