Website Statistics – Dateline and History of Edmund Broder’s – World Record Broder Buck – Non-Typical 43 point Mule Deer for which he harvested on November 26, 1926 with an unprecedented Boone and Crockett score of 355 2/8 inches and now 87 years later the role “The Broder Buck” would play in exposing Judicial Corruption within; The Federal and Provincial Justice Department’s of Canada…..

Website Statistics – Dateline and History of Edmund Broder’s – World Record Broder Buck – Non-Typical 43 point Mule Deer for which he harvested on November 26, 1926 with an unprecedented Boone and Crockett score of 355 2/8 inches and now 87 years later the role “The Broder Buck” would play in exposing Judicial Corruption within; The Federal and Provincial Justice Department’s of Canada…..

 

BRODERBUCK

Present

 The Broder Buck harvested by

Edmund Broder on November 26, 1926

just south of Wildwood, Alberta!

As measured  by The Boone & Crockett Club and scored 355 2/8 inches of antler!

AND PRONOUNCED 

The World Record

Non-Typical Mule Deer

in 1962!

FullSizeRender_edited

This website will expose the

conspiracy committed by

The Alberta Justice Department  and

specific lawyers and law firms named that

   defrauded Donald H. Broder of the Broder Buck.

*******************************************************

Welcome to:

THE BUCK FOR JUSTICE

*************************************

Kingsfrontcover

Edmund Broder’s

eldest son

Donald H. Broder

At 82 years of age;

 Passed away on April 11, 2012 with his bank account garnished

his wife Joyce M. Broder predeceased him on September 23, 2011 and while in a

long term care facility Good Samaritans in Stony Plain, Alberta suffering with Alzheimer’s and Dementia

also had her bank account garnished.

Donald H. Broder and Joyce M Broder were both  victim’s of

Judicial corruption by;

The Canadian Federal and Alberta Provincial  – Justice Departments 

willful acts of Judicial conspiracy by Justices of the Court acting in collusion with lawyers.

  For whom all conspired to orchestrate the outcome of a trial within 

Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action No: 9703-12949 heard at

The Edmonton Law Courts from January 19 – 23, 2004.

All lawyers acted in collusion with The Crown’s willful participation

 to purposely frame, defraud and falsely incarcerate Donald H. Broder.

Then in April of 2004 threatened forced entry into Donald H. Broder’s personal home, 

intimidated his wife and children and then when;

The Alberta Justice Department

could not find and confiscate The Broder Buck

 Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen requested that

Justice Myra Biebly

imprison him on April 23, 2004 until such time as he turns over the Broder Buck.

Donald H. Broder was falsely incarcerated at The Edmonton Remand Center from April 23 –  May 5. 2004

While being held in custody The Alberta Justice Department colluded with

Donald H. Broder’s own Lawyer, Guy Lacourciere to 

  defraud over $200,000 dollars from his wife Joyce Broder

and turn the money over to the Plaintiff’s lawyer

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

to secure his release from prison.

Then Justice Myra Bielby held a court auction and resold the

Broder Buck

for $325,000.00 

*********************************************************

Website Statistics

April 11, 2012 – October 1, 2016

Visitors – 134,308 *** Page Views – 403,716 *** Spiders – 69,355 *** Feeds – 5,085 

*************************************************

Thank you, on behalf of;

Donald H. Broder and Joyce M. Broder

to all who visit;

*****************************************************************

The Buck For Justice Website

******************************************************************

For which has been dedicated to all the;

Vulnerable Senior Citizen’s of Canada

for whom have been or soon will become victims of

 The Canadian Federal and Provincial Government’s

Justice Departments

 allowing Justices of the Courts to orchestrate the outcome of

legal matters by colluding with lawyers therefore

   denying all the citizens of Canada of their

human rights as prescribed within;

The Canadian Constitution

Instead these vulnerable Canadian senior citizens

Donald H. Broder and Joyce M Broder were;

 intimidate, threatened and framed

then defrauded of their resources required to survive by the;

 “unconstitutional willful criminal actions of their own”

Canadian Governments.

“RIGHT ALISON REDFORD”

This website proves;

You Alison Redford – Premier of Alberta

Past Attorney General / Justice Minister of Alberta

has blood of Canadian Senior Citizens

 on you’re hands!

“Yes, In Canada eh”

“O where” “O where”

is Alison Redford

Past Attorney General of Alberta

to answer for this crime.

After all there was a Court Order issue by

Justice Myra Bielby

at Edmonton Law Courts in May 2004

for the file of

Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949

to be turned over to the

Attorney General of Alberta

for an investigation into possible

criminal charges against

Donald Broder and Craig Broder.

orderchargesand moneytobloos1

orderchargesandmoneytobloos2

orderchargesandmoneytobloos3******************************************************************************** 

 

Yes,

Alison Redford was

The Attorney General of Alberta

in May of 2004!

Alison Redford then went on to be

The Premier of Alberta in April 2012, 

then on March 19, 2013 stepped down as

 Premier of Alberta

and went back to being an MLA.

“Then Alison Redford became the case of

MLA – MIA”

“yes”

Missing in Action”

*********************************RedfordMIA

*************************************************************

Alison Redford was MIA for a long time

lets see below what she says about a request from Craig Broder

for her involvement regarding an investigation.

**************************************************************

Redford1

 The criminal evidence 

provided on this page will be excerpts

from the lawyers and judges own documents 

and will prove beyond a reasonable doubt that; 

The Federal and Provincial Government’s of;

Canada

willfully participated in a

CONSPIRACY

by colluding to orchestrate the outcome of 

Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949 by

 being a willful participant,  knowingly and

now doing nothing to address this crime against

vulnerable Canadian Senior Citizens.

Donald H. Broder his wife Joyce M Broder

and his children and grandchildren.

Yes, we will expose;

The Criminals behind the bench at

The Edmonton and Calgary, Alberta, Canada – Law Courts

 “Justices of the court acting in collusion with lawyers to commit criminal acts of

Fraud, Perjury, Forgery, Obstruction of Justice, Trial Audio Tampering, 

Backdating and False Affidavits of Service.

*********************************************  

 White Collar

 BANDITS

orchestrating and

 committing crimes at

their own free will 

against

Canada’s

“most vulnerable!”

 “SENIOR CITIZENS!” 

“Not only does the Government of Canada allow

this atrocious act against it’s own people.”

The evidence provided within this website will prove;

“The Federal Government of Canada

and

The Alberta Justice Department

were willful participants!”

**************************************************************************************************

kingstbe or not to be

**************************************************************************************************

The Truth Be Told!

This website was initiated by;

Donald H. Broder

“Oct 11, 1929 – April 11, 2012”

In Memory of his parents;

Edmund and Hazel Broder

“Edmund Broder harvested the Broder Buck on

November 26, 1926 then was

married to;

Hazel Bailey on February 2, 1927″

“wedding picture below”

Edmund and Hazel Broder wedding picture

And created

for the benefit of all the citizens of;

Canada

 to expose judicial corruption within the;

The Alberta Justice Department

and specific

Justices and lawyers named;

for whom in this matter were all willful participants;

“colluding in an act of conspiracy to frame and defraud the defendant’s;”

Donald Broder and Craig Broder

  by orchestrating the outcome of; 

Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action No: 9703-12949

Alberta Court of Appeal Nos: 0403-0202-AC, 0403-0267-AC,0403-0356-AC

Supreme Court of Canada No: 31335

Participants in this criminal act are;

Alison Redford – Premier of Alberta, Canada

Past Attorney General / Justice Minister 

and;

The Alberta Justice Department

The Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench

The Alberta Court of Appeal

The Supreme Court of Canada

 and

The Judicial Council of Canada

for not removing from  

The Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench;

Justice C. P. Clarke, Justice R. P. Belzil, Justice Myra Bielby, Justice Carole Conrad

Justice Ronald Berger, Justice Peter Costigan, Justice Karen Horner, Justice Ged Hawco

Justice Joanne Veit, Justice R. P. Marceau, Master J. T. Prowse, Master Hannebury

Master Smart, Master W. Breitkreuz;

and

Federally appointed;

Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich “retired”

Past Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore

And

The Law Society of Alberta

for not having criminal charges initiated against the named;

Lawyers & Law Firms;

 Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen

Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson

Bill Kenny of Miller Thomson

Joseph Kueber of Bryan & Company

Guy Lacourciere of Lacourcier Associates

and

Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham

for whom accepted excess of $15,000 as

Donald H. Broder’s criminal defence lawyer

then allowed his own client an innocent 75 year old senior citizen

“to be falsely incarcerated”

and then

accepted another $15,000 to file

The Application for leave to;

The Supreme Court of Canada

and with the assistance of;

Henry S. Brown of Gowling Lafleur Henderson an Ottawa law firm

orchestrated the loss of his own client,

Donald H. Broder 

by colluding and orchestrating the documents relied on within

The Application for Leave to

The Supreme Court of Canada

 willfully excluding  the necessary court filed documents 

that would exonerate his client to;

The Supreme Court of Canada

thereby successfully

obtaining a dismissal of;

The Application for Leave to;

The Supreme Court of Canada;

 to cover up his participation with

The Alberta Justice Department’s  

acts of collusion and conspiracy

for which he was a part of 

that framed an innocent senior citizen

therefore defrauding his own client

Donald H. Broder;

and now

without consequences from the;

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

 Economic and Commercial Crime Unit.

 for whom now are also acting in collusion with the;

Crown Prosecutors Office;

ignoring the factual evidence and continuing to deny

the formal request to;

criminally charge 

each and every;

Justice of the Court, lawyer and employees of law firms that willfully;

participated in this

CONSPIRACY!

But instead;

The Alberta Justice Department

lead by;

 Alison Redford 

during her reign as;

Justice Minister / Attorney General of Alberta, Canada.

has chosen to conceal and cover-up that;

Conspiracy, Fraud, Obstruction of Justice, Extortion and Perjury

was committed by all the perpetrators named and

as the evidence will prove all participants

 acted with willful intent to orchestrate the outcome of

Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench action no. 9703-12949

 at the Edmonton, Alberta – Law Court 

by;

Federally appointed Justices of the Court conspiring with lawyers

 for whom all willfuly chose to act in collusion to frame and falsely incarcerate

an innocent 75 year old senior citizen,

Donald H. Broder,

for 11 days at

The Edmonton Remand Center

where they could use fear tactics for his well being to scare his 

children and grandchildren

while taking advantage of his wife Joyce Broder.

“Picture of Donald and Joyce Broder below”

memories3

The following information is provided to you the reader;

so you have the knowledge of how to;

  guard your family from”

 

Organized  Government Crime

within

The Alberta Justice Department

And

The Alberta Government

as all elected Canadian government officials have and

continue to act with willful intent to; 

 conceal, ignore and demonstrate disregard to;

The Canadian Constitution  

 by allowing  

“harm against the vulnerable and innocent elderly” 

with purposeful acts of collusion to conceal;

Judicial Fraud,

consisting of;

Conspiracy to Defraud,

Contempt of Court

Perjury, Forgery and Backdating,

Deleting audio from Trial recordings,

Filing and Relying on False Affidavits of Service,

from the Canadian people.

**********************************

And also by allowing the;

Substitution of a new Plaintiff to the Statement of Claim after

the Applicable limitation period had lapsed

willfully breaching;

The Statute of Limitation of Actions Act.

to purposely frame an;  

  innocent 75 year old Canadian citizens.

Donald Harrison Broder

 “A sincere and genuine gentle husband, father and grandfather

for whom never caused harm to anyone in his life.”

DBTUX

“Born October 11, 1929 and passed away on April 11, 2012

with his bank account garnished by

The Alberta Justice Department

and his wife

Joyce Broder “below” 

Joyce Broder at the Good Samaritans Lodge

while in a Good Samaritans care facility

suffering with

Dementia and Alzheimer’s also

had her bank account garnished

depleting her ability to pay the

monthly costs for her long term care.”

Garnishes of Joyce Broder and Letter of Doctor (full version PDF)

***********************************************************************

HISTORY IN THE MAKING

edmlawcourts911

1926 through and ongoing into 2013 and beyond……

The picture below is from 1962 Edmonton Journal newspaper reporter Gary Cooper that was published shortly after the Trophy Mule Deer was returned to Edmund Broder from a Boone & Crockett Club scoring session in New York U.S.A. at which time The Broder Buck was pronounced The World Record Non-Typical Mule Deer with an unprecedented Boone & Crockett  score of 355 2/8 inches. Edmund Broder would leave annually on November 11 for his hunting expedition south of Chip Lake, Alberta usually staying at a friends home in Wildwood then traveling south into the Carrot Creek and Rat Lake area sometimes not returning to his home in Edmonton, Alberta until just before Christmas. 

As the story was told;

The Broder Buck was harvested by Edmund  Broder 

south of Chip Lake, Alberta Canada by The Bigoray River,

90 mile west of Edmonton on November 26, 1926 and

transported home on Ed’s 1914 Ford Model T.

This website will provide to you the reader; 

 Evidence of how The Alberta Justice Department and specifically named Justices and Lawyers conspired to defraud the Broder family of this magnificent trophy by orchestrating the outcome of a civil litigation at the Edmonton Law Courts in excess of 25  years after the death of Edmund Broder. Lawyers acting for the Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s colluded with The Crown to orchestrate the outcome and milk the Broder family for their own monitory gain by; failing to comply with a Court Order, filing false Affidavits, backdating documents, forging Judges signatures and then incarcerating an innocent 75 year old senior citizen, Edmund Broder’s eldest living son Donald H. Broder for 11 days in

The Edmonton Remand Center to teach him a lesson.

 Factual evidence on this web page will expose and prove when, how and whom the

lawyers and Justices are that willfully acted in collusion with

The Alberta Justice Department to frame and defraud and innocent man and

will be provided to you the reader in an easy to understand format 

for the sole purpose to exonerate this innocent;

Husband, Father and Grandfather;

Donald H. Broder

“for whom now will be remembered for teaching the Justices and lawyers a lesson!”

 The website was developed by and on behalf of 

Donald H. Broder for whom was the primary victim;

Now through his own relentless efforts the results of his investigation will

expose corruption within

The Canadian Judicial System;

TO THE WORLD! 

ed1962newspaper

 

“With and Without Prejudice!”

Welcome To:

The Buck For Justice Website

Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949 was filed in the Edmonton Law Courts on July 8, 1997 proceeded to trial January 19 – 23, 2004, Alberta Justice falsely incarcerated Donald H. Broder  for 11 day from April 26 – May 6 of 2004 at The Edmonton Remand Center while the matter was under appeal at The Alberta Court of Appeal. Then followed by an orchestrated Application for Leave to The Supreme Court of Canada for which was dismissed in April of 2006 not allowing the matter to be heard at The Supreme Court of Canada as it was not in the public’s best interest to be made aware of Judicial Corruption, Fraud, Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Collusion and that The Alberta Justice Department had participated in a conspiracy to orchestrate the outcome because the Plaintiff’s lawyer Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen had complained to her daddy Alberta Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore she had been ambushed by the Defendant’s Donald Broder and Craig Broders lawyer Robert Sawers of  R. J. Sawers and Associates.

kingstbe or not to be

The documents and information on this website will provide proof that everything was orchestrated by the Justices at Edmonton Law Courts and the Lawyers named from March 15, 2001, inclusive of The Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Trial, The Alberta Court of Appeal and The Application for leave to The Supreme Court of Canada for the sole purpose to protect the Plaintiff’s Lawyer, Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen from ambushing herself as she had forced the Pleadings closed before she had applied for Probate at the Surrogate Courts. Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Actions were commenced against certain Lawyers in December – 2006, 2008, and 2010 and the following information was obtained from producible records, cross examinations and true filed copies of court documents obtained from The Clerk of the Courts in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

The evidence provided will identify the perpetrators and prove collusion, fraud and conspiracy committed by The Alberta Justice Department, Justices and Lawyers willful actions to frame, falsely incarcerate and defraud an innocent senior citizen for the sole purpose to protect the Plaintiff’s Lawyer, Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen because she made the comment that she had been ambushed by Donald Broder’s Lawyer Robert Sawers because he allowed her to force the pleadings closed on or before March 15, 2001 by way of Court Order within Action 9703-12949.

Robert Sawers then obtained leave of the Court to have an outstanding 129 application heard that the action was frivolous, vexatious, and abuse of court process as only Personal Representatives were allowed to sue on behalf of a deceased ” relying on case law Mugford vs. Mugford – Newfoundland Court of Appeal” and for which at the time Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had closed the Pleadings before she made an Application for Probate and as such Personal Representatives did not exist since the death of Edmund Broder on December 26, 1968 to March 15, 2001 for which was the deadline set by court order that closed the pleadings within action 9703-12949 excess of 32 years.

This evidence provided within this website will walk you the reader through the conspiracy to defraud an innocent 75 year old senior citizen, Donald Broder committed by his own lawyers; Guy Lacourciere of Lacourciere Associates, Bryan Kickham and Bill Kenny of Miller Thomson, Joseph Kueber of Bryan and Company and Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham to frame him in order to protect the Plaintiffs Lawyer; Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen from losing the law suit because she had forced closed the pleadings on herself by way of Court Order before she filed The Application for Probate with The Surrogate Courts and as such the action was frivolous, vexatious and abuse of process without Personal Representatives that had not been appointed by the Surrogate Courts.

Personal Representatives therefore did not exist at the time the Court ordered the Pleadings closed within the said action and as such even if the Application for Probate was successful and Personal Representatives would be appointed they could not be add/substituted as Plaintiff’s on The Statement of Claim within the said action as the expiration of the applicable limitation period as defined as two years within the Limitations of Actions Act to add or substitute a new claimant / Plaintiff had lapsed.

Evidence that everything that transpired within Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949 after March 15, 2001

 ” The date for which Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich had ordered the pleading closed”

was orchestrated between;

The Plaintiffs and Defendants lawyers were all now committing fraud on the courts y conspiring and acting in collusion with The Alberta Justice Department”

to frame an innocent senior citizen for the purpose to defraud him and his family. 

November 14, 2008 I, Donald Broder attended Edmonton Law Court to review the true filed copies of the filed documents within Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action No. 9703-12949. The Clerk realized I, Donald Broder was the Defendant and handed my son a copy of the Procedural Record Print and expressed;

“If you’re suing lawyers this is where you start! Please don’t blame us; we just do what we are told around here!”

It was then we realized the conspiracy to orchestrate had been with purposeful intent and willful actions of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Justices colluding with all the lawyers involved to defraud my family and I by all parties named below; Alison Redford – Attorney General / Justice Minister – The Department of Justice, specifically, Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich, Master Quinn, Justices; C. P. Clarke, Myra Bielby, Carole Conrad, Ronald Berger and Peter Costigan, for whom were all willful participated in a conspiracy with my own Lawyers, Bryan Kickham and Bill Kenny of Miller Thomson, Guy Lacourciere of Lacourciere Associates, Joseph Kueber of Bryan and Company and Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham

To orchestrate the outcome of Action 9703-12949 for whom all had conspired to ambush me and protect the Plaintiff’s Lawyer; Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen as she had made the comment she had been ambushed by one of my Lawyers; Robert Sawers of R. J. Sawers and Associates.

A full investigation was launched immediately and it was then;

I, Donald H. Broder realized; 

“I was suing the least guilty Lawyer, Robert J. Sawers, of R. J. Sawers & Associates”

This website will reveal what our investigation has uncovered..

Why the Clerk of the Court said, “Please don’t blame us we just do what we are told around here”

The Plaintiff’s lawyer Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had obtained a court order in December 2000 from Justice J L Lewis to file the Certificate of Readiness on February 15, 2001 allowing time for the Defendants to make a Jury Trial Application before Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich,  then leave of the court was granted or a time extension during my Jury trial application from Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich to close the pleadings on March 15, 2001 to allow time for my outstanding 129 application challenging the Plaintiff’s standing or right to sue as the Application for Probate had never been before the Surrogate Courts and Personal Representatives did not exist. The action was to be dismissed at my 129 application and no jury would be required because only Personal Representatives could sue on behalf of a deceased and the Plaintiff’s lacked standing to sue in their personal capacity. This website will expose the collusion and orchestration between my own lawyers and the Plaintiff’s lawyer; Elizabeth MacInnis with Justices in the Alberta Law Court exposing how they colluded to made the application for probate on May 24, 2001 to appoint Personal Representatives, falsify an Affidavit of service, substituted the Personal Representatives as Plaintiff’s after the applicable limitation period expired, amended my statement of defence 10 days before the trial to purposely conceal that the issue of lack of Personal Representatives had been raised in the original Statement of Defence, back dated the FIAT “permission to amended the Statement of Defence from January 9, 2004 to January 9, 2003 forge the judges second signature below the false date on the FIAT and delete audio from the trial audio removing my open statements at trial.

The Clerk of the Court had to have been told to ignore the Order of The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich and keep the Pleadings open in Action 9703-12949 to allow Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen time to file for Probate appoint Personal Representatives without effective service on Donald H. Broder and Amend the Amended Statement of Claim to add the Personal Representatives as Plaintiffs after the applicable limitation period of 2 years to add or substitute a new Plaintiff had expired. The Clerk of the Court had to also have been told to allow the Certificate of Readiness,”for which would close the pleadings” to be allowed to be filed on April 17, 2003, instead of as Ordered by The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich to file The Certificate of Readiness on or before March 15, 2001. The Clerk of the Court had to have been told to allow Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson to file an Amended Statement of Defence as per the true FIAT date of January 9, 2004, 10 days before the scheduled trial of January 19 – 23, 2004, although the FIAT was back dated to a false date of January 9, 2003 to predate the file date of the second Certificate of Readiness it was with purposeful intent to orchestrate that the Amended Statement of Defence would take total precedence at trial.   This tactic by my own lawyer Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson would conceal from the trial Judge; Justice Bielby that; “the first time the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives was raised was in the Original Statement of Defence.”

Danielle Smith, leader of the Wildrose Party, in the presence of MLA Rob Anderson, Paul Hindman, Heather Forsyth, and Guy Boutiller, was quoted in the Calgary Sun, Sunday – June 26, 2011 as saying;

“We’re too smart to fall for fear mongering.” – “then later in 2015 Danielle Smith and her gang of renegades joined the PC party”

I, Donald H. Broder an 80 year old senior citizen quote; I am also too smart to fall for fear mongering.”

“Now in 2015 – The Broder’s stand alone and will not tolerate any government of Canada’s fear mongering” 

Lets see if the newly elected NDP party led by Rachel Notley – Premier and Kathleen Ganley – Attorney General stand up or fall for fear mongering!

Their to busy pushing through a Bill to look like a worker safety issue on is really a tax on families that work their own farm.

This Website will identify to you the reader how ;

The Alberta Justice Department and Lawyers conspired against an innocent senior citizen; Donald H. Broder to defraud him and come to the aid of  the Plaintiff’s  Lawyer, Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen to aide her from being ambushed by my Lawyer, Robert J. Sawers, or should I say from ambushing herself because she had forced the pleading closed within action 9703-12949 before she applied for probate.

And we will also prove that a Court Order exists from Justice Myra Bielby that ordered the file and transcripts be turned over to Alison Redford – Attorney General of Alberta for an investigation into possible criminal charges be laid against the Broder family but the evidence will prove otherwise that criminal charges should have been laid against all Justices and lawyers involved for their criminal conduct of conspiracy to defraud an innocent senior citizen and his family. 

 Alison Redford has and continues to be willfully blind and takes the do nothing approach hoping this matter will go away.

She could not be more wrong!

It is Alleged…

Alison Redford – Alberta Canada – Minister of Justice / Attorney General knowingly

has allowed The Alberta Justice Department to;

Participate in Judicial and Health Care Fraud as of against innocent senior citizens,

Donald H. Broder and his wife, Joyce M. Broder

by;

1) Justices of the Courts and Lawyers orchestrating the outcome of the trial by not following Court Orders, falsifying documents, misleading the trial Judge for which lead to the wrongful imprisonment of I, Donald Broder, a 75 year old senior on a Friday April 26 – 2004 for 11 days in the Edmonton Remand Center without food or medical requirements until I called my son; Jeff Broder on Saturday April 27, 2004 shortly after 12:00 noon for whom showed up at the Edmonton Remand Center and demanded I; Donald H. Broder his Father be provided immediate medical attention and a meal or else the Remand Center deal with the consequences!  

2) And now in 2011 the Alberta Justice Department garnished my wife, Joyce Broder’s, bank account of her pension monies for Court costs imposed against me within Actions in Calgary Law Court against Lawyers for which have been wrongfully dismissed and that my terminally ill wife, Joyce Broder, had nothing to do with, as she resides in a Good Samaritans – Long Term Care Facility diagnosed in the later stages of Dementia and Alzheimer’s.

All Justices and lawyers named will be exposed for their willful roles conspiring to commit Judicial Fraud as of against an innocent senior citizens, Donald H. Broder and his wife, Joyce M. Broder by;

1) The Defendant; Donald H. Broder owns lawyers, Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham, Bryan Kickham and Bill Kenny of Miller Thomson, Joseph Kueber of Bryan and Company and Guy Lacourciere of Lacourciere Associates for whom all acted in collusion with Justices of the Edmonton Alberta Law Courts to protect the Plaintiff’s lawyer; Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen from being ambushed because she had closed the pleadings on herself within Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949 before the Application for Probate was filed within Surrogate Courts action SES03 113567  and allowing her to falsify the Affidavit of Service for the Application for Probate, appoint Personal Representatives then Amend the Amended Statement of Claim and substitute the Personal Representatives as Plaintiffs to the said action after the applicable limitation period of 2 years had lapsed.

2) Conspiring with Donald H. Broder’s own lawyer Bryan Kickham of Miller Thompson to protect Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen and frame Donald H. Broder by his willful acts to file an Amended Statement of Defence on January 9, 2004 just 10 days before the scheduled trial of January 19, 2004 willfully backdating the FIAT to January 9, 2003 to predate the second fake conditional certificate of readiness filed dated of April 17, 2003 knowingly it would become total precedence at trial and for the sole purpose to conceal paragraph 8 within the Original Statement of Defence from the Trial Justice Myra Bielby as to the first time the issue of Standing / lack of Personal Representatives as per Alberta Rules of Court Rule 129 was raised.

3) Alberta Justice Department conspiring by deleting audio of the trial in Action 9703-12949 specifically the Opening Statements as read at trial on behalf of Donald H. Broder the morning of January 19, 2004.

4) The Alberta Court of Appeal Justice’s; Carole Conrad, Ronald Berger and Peter Costigan also conspired with Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen; to frame an innocent senior when they were made aware within the Alberta Court of Appeal Books the first time the issue of standing was raised / lack of Personal Representatives as per Alberta Rules of Court Rule 129 was not early 2001 as Elizabeth MacInnis told Justice Myra Bielby but contained with Donald H. Broder’s Original Statement of Defence filed on July 28, 1997 and that Donald H Broder’s own defence lawyer Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson had amended his own clients Statement of Defence on January 9, 2004 backdating it to January 9, 2003, forged a Judges signature to purposely collude with the Plaintiff’s lawyer Elizabeth MacInnis and conspire to defraud his own client Donald H. Broder.

5) Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham Donald H. Broder criminal lawyer during the orchestrated contempt of court charge had to also orchestrate the Application for Leave to The Supreme Court of Canada to cover his own acts of conspiracy to defraud Donald H. Broder.

The information published on this website is public information obtained by the Defendant, Donald H. Broder within Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949, Alberta Surrogate Courts Action SOS03 113567, Alberta Court of Appeal NOS. 0403-0202-AC, 0403-0267-AC, 0403-0356-AC,and The Supreme Court of Canada Action No. 31335 and was provided by;

1. Edmonton Law Courts – The Clerk of the Court.

2. Alberta Justice – Transcript Management.

3. Alison Redford – The Attorney General / Justice Minister.

4. The Queen’s Printer – Alberta Rules of Court.

5. Affidavits filed at Calgary Law Courts within actions brought against lawyers.

6. Cross Examination of Guy Lacourciere on his Affidavit – transcribed by Carol A. Bourgeois. CSR “Court Reporter”

7. Supreme Court of Canada / PDF of the True Filed Copy of the Application for Leave for which was dismissed in April, 2006.

8. Producible Records provided during litigation against lawyers.

9. The Law Society of Alberta.

10.  Alberta Lawyers Insurance Association. “ALIA”

11.  Privileged and confidential documents of Donald H. Broder.

12.  Edmonton Commercial Crimes Unit

13.  Confidential information providers.

Please note: For all documents referred to on the tabs to follow

eg. Original Statement of Defence (PDF full version),

simply right click the document title to open the full version.

Introduction

The Alberta Justice Department / Justices and Lawyers from Alberta named within are all Defendants standing trial to you the reader.

This website was created for the benefit of all Canadians in order that you might learn how to guard;

  Canada’s most vulnerable

SENIOR CITIZENS   

“the older generation”

and how to protect

THE CHILDREN

“the younger generation”

 from being haunted by the effects on their lives by witnessing

Judicial Corruption in Canada against the most vulnerable.

You The Reader Be The Jury

History of;

“The Broder Buck”

and how

Justices within The Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench participated in;

orchestrating the  outcome of the trial of action 9703-12949

held before Justice Myra Bielby January 19 – 23, 2004

at The Edmonton Law Courts.

and

will also prove the roles of how the;

The Alberta Court of Appeal

Nos: 0403-0202-AC, 0403-0267-AC and 0403-0356-AC

and

The Supreme Court of Canada

No: 31335

chose to cover it up!

DATELINE

1887 – The Boone & Crockett Club was founded by Theodore Roosevelt; responsible for a long list of activities that either created or preserved the hunting opportunities we enjoy today.

1891– Edmund Broder was born on a homestead half way between Edmonton and Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta in an area known as Horse Hill.

1909 – Edmund Broder worked for Rose and Bell Livery Stable and was responsible for breaking horses for The North West Mounted Police.

          Note: (Below is the re-digitized image of a 1909 postcard commemorating Edmund Broder for his role in breaking horses)

1909 – 1914 –  Wild Horses from Montana and Wyoming, USA were herded up to Edmonton, Alberta, Canada and held in a large pasture at the Rose and Bell Livery Stable for which now is part of Edmonton and  to date the  RCMP – K Division, Kingsway Garden Mall and the Municipal Airport exist on this land.  

1914 – 1918 – 1st World War started in 1914 for which Edmund Broder’s employer Rose and Bell Livery Stable was also called upon to break horses for use by the United States of America and Canadian Military.

1915 – Edmund Broder purchased 160 acres of treed land in the area of Horse Hill settlement North East of Edmonton, Alberta close proximity to Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta.

1917 – Edmund Broder purchased his first and only automobile a 1914 Ford Model T from Joe Smith a Ford Dealer in Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta, Canada.

November 26, 1926 –

Canadian History is made!

Imagine

With a single shot from Ed’s Winchester 32 Special “The World Record Mule Deer” goes down in an area known as Chip Lake, Alberta, Canada.

Recreated Image of what Ed Broder would have spotted in November 1926. 

FullSizeRender_edited

Buck1

and transported back to the Broder homestead in Horse Hill Alberta,

in Ed’s 1914 Ford Model T Touring Car.

broder-buck-postcard-f 1927 – Edmund  Broder marries Hazel Bailey.

Edmund and Hazel Broder wedding picture

1928 – Fairview Alberta Community Hospital was opened and was were Donald Harrison Broder was born on October 11, 1929.

Thank you to the new hospital in Fairview, Alberta for providing access to this historic picture.

FullSizeRender 

1929 – October 11 – Donald  Harrison Broder was born in Fairview, Alberta. 

1929 – 1939 –  The Great Depression started on October 12, 1929 and lasted until the 2nd World War started in September 1939.

1939 – 1945 – 2nd World War started in September 1939 and was the primary reason for the end of The Great Depression as many workers were employed to build War Machinery. 

1957 – Donald Harrison Broder marries Claire Marie Bourasssa.

1957 – December – Edmund Broder is interviewed by the Edmonton Journal upon returning home from his annual 4 to 6 week Big Game hunting trip.

1957newspapermodelT

1958, May – Donald H. Broder’s first son is born and named him Donald Craig Broder.

1960 – The Broder Buck antlers are rough scored by George Mitchell and an invitation was extended to Edmund Broder to have;

“The Broder Buck”

officially scored at the next

Boone & Crockett panel session in

New York, U.S.A.

landforestpicture

1960, April – Donald H. Broder’s second son is born and names him Marc Edwin Broder.

1962, January – Donald H. Broder’s third son is born and names him Jeffery Edmund Murray Broder.

*****************************************

1962

Edmund Broder 

sends his trophy Mule Deer by railway to;

New York U.S.A.

to be officially scored by

The Boone & Crockett Club

      ***********************

THE BRODER BUCK

also known as;

“The Chip Lake Buck”

was declared

THE WORLD RECORD

Non-Typical Mule Deer

with a final

Boone & Crockett score of

355 2/8 inches of antler 

**************************************************************************************

HISTORY IS MADE

The Edmonton Journal reporter Gary Cooper reports on the World Record 

Broder Buck upon it’s return from being officially scored.

ed1962newspaper

1963, November – Donald H. Broder has a fourth child his first daughter and names her Carolyn Elise Broder.

1967– Hazel Broder dies leaving all her and Ed’s valuable belongings disposed of in her will.

1968 – December 26– Edmund Broder dies with only a few personal belongings.

1969 – June 18 – Donald H. Broder was hired by Alberta Public Works New Construction in Edmonton as a Building Inspector to oversee the construction of Provincial Buildings and projects in Edmonton, Alberta.

  • University of Alberta Bio Science Building.
  • Underground Tunnel system at The University of Alberta.

1971 – September – Public Works transferred Donald H. Broder to Calgary, Alberta, Canada and he oversaw the construction of the following Provincial Building and Historical Sites until he retires in 1987.

  • Sam Livingston Fish Hatchery.
  • Caroline Brood Station.
  • Calgary Remand Center.
  • Calgary Court House pioneered the procedures for asbestos removal.
  • Lethbridge Court House.
  • Lethbridge Jail.  
  • Head Smashed In Buffalo Jump, Northwest of Fort Macleod, Alberta.
  • Frank Slide Interpretive Center.  
  • Cochrane Ranch
  • Brooks Pheasant Hatchery
  • Medicine Hat Court House construction of the new and restoration of the old building.
  • McDougall School Calgary renovation and restoration.
  • Fish Creek Park, Calgary buildings and bridges.
  • Alberta Treasury Branch’s and Liquor Stores.

1972 – Edmund Broder’s family decided not to apply for probate as his personal affects had little to no value and were taken randomly and claimed by his children.

1973 Don Broder takes possession and claims the Mule Deer Trophy as a keep sake as the other family members were claiming their own keep sakes of their parents Edmund and Hazel Broder.

1987– Donald H. Broder is offered a retirement package from Alberta Public Works and retires on an 78 acre ranch by Sundre, Alberta with plans to enjoy his retirement by rebuilding horse drawn carriages, restoring a Model T similar to his fathers and spending time with his children and grandchildren.

Little did he know that a conspiracy to defraud him would occur  from July 8, 1997 by Justices and his own defence lawyers acting in collusion with the Plaintiff’s lawyer Elizabeth MacInnis right up to his passing on April 11, 2012.

1992 – Case Law: Mugford vs. Mugford (Nfld. C. A.) David Hurley for the Appellant. and William Morrow for the Respondent. Heard November 9, 1992. To be posted at the end of the Litigation 9703-12949 Tab and as relied upon as precedence during the Alberta Rules of Court Rule 129 Application heard by Master Quinn and the Appeal of Master Quinn heard by Justice C. P. Clarke, Edmonton Law Courts.

Decision in Mugford vs. Mugford: “Only Personal Representatives can bring on a legal action on behalf of a deceased”

1997 – March – Donald H. Broder’s son Craig Broder was served a demand letter to return the Broder Buck to his siblings. Donald Broder refuses until such time that an application for Probate is filed with the Surrogate Courts and a Personal Representative is successfully appointed to administer the Estate of Edmund Broder as per Surrogate Court Rules.

Case Law and Statutes referenced during the litigation;
Case Law mugford vs. mugford (PDF)
Mugford vs. Mugford – Newfoundland Supreme Court – Court of Appeal – Goodridge C.J.N., O’Neill and Cameron JJ.A. Heard: November 9, 1992 – Judgment: December 15, 1992. ” The Personal Representatives must be appointed by the Surrogate Courts to act on behalf of the Estate of the deceased and named as Plaintiffs for the action to have standing within the Courts.
Rocklake vs. Timberjack (PDF)
Rocklake vs. Timberjack – Alberta Court of Appeal. Heard 22nd day of March 1999 before Justice Cote, Wittman, and “Ronald Berger.” Note: Justice Ronald Berger was the dissenting Justice on Rocklake vs. Timberjack, Justice Cote and Wittman overturned the decision of Justice Murray and set aside the Order allowing an Amendment to substitute a new Plaintiff after the Limitation Period had expired. It was decided that; “one cannot add a new Plaintiff after the Limitation Period, as adding a new Plaintiff relies on a rule of Court and Rules of Court are Regulations. Regulations do not override Statutes.
Note: Justice; Ronald Berger was one of the three Justices that was on the bench and heard the Alberta Court Appeal within this action with Carole Conrad and Peter Costigan and allowed the substitution of the Personal Representatives within action 9703-12949 after the expiration of the applicable 2 year Limitation Period as per Alberta New Limitation Act..
Statutes; Alberta’s New Limitation Act“adopted into Legislation March 1, 1999 and defines 2 years as the limitation period for adding or substituting a new Plaintiff on a Statement of Claim.” 

1997 – July 8A Statement of Claim is served on Donald Broder and Craig Broder for replevin of the Trophy without the Personal Representatives named as Plaintiffs, as an Application for Probate had never been applied for at the Surrogate Courts for excess of 25 years since Edmund Broders’ death on December 26, 1968.

Note: The Plaintiffs named were Earl Broder, George Broder, Richard Broder, Margaret Macphee, Doris Bibaud, and Luella Adam. “for whom are all siblings to Donald Broder.” The Personal Representatives were not named as Plaintiff’s as the Application for Probate had not been applied for since the death of Edmund Broder on December 26, 1968.

1997 – July 28A Statement of Defence is filed by Joseph Kueber of Bryan & Company on behalf of Donald Broder and Craig Broder for which in paragraph 8; the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives was raised as per ;

Alberta Rules of Court Rule 129 –

paragraph 8 within the original Statement of Defence filed on July  28, 1997

raised the issue that the action had no standing as it was;

“frivolous, vexatious, and abuse of court process.”

1999 – March 1 – Alberta adopts a New Limitation of Action Act, which set a 2 years limitation period to add or substitute a new Plaintiff and also a 10 year drop dead clause.

1999 – July 9The two year limitation period lapses from the file date of July 8, 1997 of the Original Statement of Claim to add or substitute a new Plaintiff ‘s within Action 9703-12949 as set out within Alberta’s New Statute of Limitation of Action Act.  The Personal Representatives do not exist as probate still has not been applied for at this time and it is now almost 30 years since the death of Edmund Broder and the New Statute of Limitation was adopted on March 1, 1999 for which now includes a 10 year drop dead clause and will govern the Application for Probate and should be dismissed if and when applied for at The Surrogate Courts.

2000 December – Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen requests consent to close the pleadings within action 9703-12949 which was declined by Donald Broder as he continued to explain to his lawyer that his sibling could not sue him only Personal Representatives had a legal right to make demands for the return of Estate property or start a court action to recover Estate property.

2000 – December – Elizabeth MacInnis file a motion to close the pleadings and was granted a Court Order by Justice J. L. Lewis with a deadline of February 15 , 2001 to close the Pleadings, allowing time for a Jury Trial Application by Donald Broder’s Lawyer Robert Sawers. Robert Sawers is aware that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen is now in a conflict position to act on behalf of the Estate of Edmund Broder as she just closed the Pleadings on herself within action 9703-12949 for which she is against Donald Broder one of the Beneficiary and had waited until just before the closing of the pleadings to raise the issue that the Plaintiff’s lack standing only Personal Representatives appointed by the Surrogate Courts can sue on behalf of a deceased.

The Court Order of Justice J. L. Lewis below; 

Lewisorder1

 

Paragraph 5. below – Certificate of Readiness must be filed by February 15, 2001.

Lewisorder2

Paragraph 6. Donald Broder and Craig Broder are ordered to pay $1,000.00 cost forthwith.

NOTE: The Application for Probate had still not been filed at The Surrogate Courts and now it was excess of 30 years since the death of Edmund Broder on December 26, 1968 to December or 2000.

2000 – December – Justice Lewis granted costs to Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen totaling $1,000.00 to be paid forthwith by Donald Broder and Craig Broder; it was paid and then Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen does not adhere to the very Order she made an application for and was granted by Justice J. L. Lewis in December of 2000,  for which leave of the Court was granted to extend the time to March 15, 2001 by Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich for the Defendants Donald Broder and Craig Broder to have their outstanding 129 Application.

“Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen ambushed herself”

2000 – DecemberChief Justice W. Kenneth Moore ” Elizabeth MacInnis’s Father” retires and A. H. Wachowich replaces him at Edmonton Law Courts as Chief Justice of Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench.

2001 – February– Robert Sawers files a 129 Application to strike the claim as being frivolous, vexatious, and abuse of court process; the Plaintiffs do not have standing to sue in their personal capacity only if a Grant of Administration is obtained the Personal Representatives have such a right to bring on an action on behalf of a deceased.

2001 – February – Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich denies the Jury trial application and extends the time to file the Certificate of Readiness to March 15, 2001, allowing time for the outstanding 129 Application, and that only the Defendants can attend any Justice of the Courts to extend the time to file the Certificate of Readiness.

2001 – March 12 – Robert Sawers provides Elizabeth MacInnis with Case Law Mugford vs, Mugford to support the 129 Application that the Plaintiffs do not have standing to sue in their personal capacity only Personal Representatives can sue on behalf of a deceased. Case Law was included Mugford vs. Mugford.

Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore requests an adjournment stating to Robert Sawers she has an urgent family matter.

“Her way of saying i’m going to tell my daddy past Chief Justice W Kenneth Moore on you for allowing me to ambush myself!” 

2001 – March 15As per The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich order The Pleadings are closed within Action 9703-12949 as Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen, Lawyer for the Plaintiffs forced them closed on herself before she applied for probate.

2001 -March 15 – The Plaintiff’s lawyer, Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen becomes aware that the Court Order issued at her request by Justice J. L. Lewis to file the Certificate of Readiness and close the pleading would cause her o lose the lawsuit as she had not applied for probate and as such Personal Representatives did not exist and not only need to exist must be name as Plaintiff’s on the Statement of Claim.  

2001- March 15 Donald Broder and Craig Broder won the lawsuit as soon as Elizabeth MacInnis files the Certificate of Readiness as per The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich order on or before March 15, 2001.

As of March 15, 2001 the Pleadings were closed within the said action and

the action  not have standing in court without

Probate be applied for at the Surrogate Courts and

Personal Representatives appointed then

even if they were successful

 the limitation period for adding or substituting the

Personal Representatives as Plaintiffs had lapsed.

***********************************************

The rest of the dateline will provide proof how the lawsuit was orchestrated for Donald Broder and Craig Broder to lose.

**********************************************************************************************************************************

Elizabeth MacInnis ignores the Order of Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich to file the Certificate of Readiness on or before March 15, 2001, as she realized that Action 9703-12949 is frivolous, vexatious, and abuse of court process and that the Plaintiffs she was representing lacked standing to sue in their personal capacity and an Application for Probate must be first Granted by the Surrogate Courts appointing Personal Representatives for whom are the only legal entity that have standing to bring on an action on behalf of a deceased person.

Wachowichorder1

Paragraph 1. The Defendants do not require a jury as the action will be dismissed at the;

Paragraph 2. application to dismiss he Plaintiff’s claim under Rule 129

Paragraph 3. Time is extended for the filing of the Certificate of Readiness to March 15, 2001

Paragraph 4. Only the defendants can attend any Justice for the purpose of extending the time in paragraph 2 and 3.

Wachowichorder2

2001- March 16 – Elizabeth  MacInnis of  Bowen is now in Contempt of Court, but at the end of the trial in January 2004 once the decision is order by Justice Myra Bielby – Elizabeth MacInnis has Donald H. Broder sited in contempt of court for not following the 2004 Court Order while all along it is Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen in contempt of Court for not following the March 15, 2001 Court Order of Chief Justice SA. H. Wachowich .

FYI: Elizabeth MacInnis has Donald Broder incarcerated at the Edmonton Remand Center from April 23 – May 5, 2004 for not following the 2004 Court Order issued by the trial Judge Justice Bielby while all along it was Elizabeth MacInnis that was in contempt of court for following Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Court Order that order the Certificate of Readiness be filed within this matter on or before March 15, 2001.

I’m glad you asked;

 When did Elizabeth MacInnis file the Certificate of Readiness?

Below is the case management meeting held on May 7, 2003 whereby

Elizabeth MacInnis informs Justice Marceau the Certificate of Readiness was filed on

April 17, 2003.

Donald Broder and Craig Broder lawyer

Guy Lacourciere plays along.

 

For The Record:

Justice J. L. Lewis  and Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Court Orders go missing from the file at Edmonton Law Courts.

The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich order closed the Pleading within Alberta Court of Queens Bench action 9703-12949 at this time and the Justices and Lawyers all start to conspire to  orchestrate and frame an innocent 75 year old senior citizen, Donald H. Broder.  Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen could not proceed to make the Application for Probate as she had just closed the Pleading on herself and now was in a conflict position and not allowed to represent the Beneficiaries because she was acting against Donald H. Broder within action 9703-12949 for which the pleadings were closed.

2001 – April – Master Quinn orders the action is to be struck if Personal Representatives and the Grant of Administration is not obtained at the Surrogate Courts and adjourns the Defendants 129 application to benefit Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen. By adjourning the Defendants application Master Quinn keeps the pleading open. 

2001 – April – Robert Sawers lawyer for Donald Broder and Craig Broder advises his clients that  “in the event of the pending Estate Litigation Donald Broder should consider counsel specializing in Estate Litigation.” That the action he is handling for Donald Broder and Craig Broder did not become an estate matter as the pleadings were closed within the said action before The Application for Probate was filed with the Surrogate Courts. 2001 – April – The Plaintiff’s lawyer, Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen makes the comment that she had been ambushed by the Defendant’s lawyer, Robert Sawers. See “Cross-examination of Guy Lacourciere”

2001 – April – The Defendant’s, Donald Broder and Craig Broder had won Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949 if the Plaintiff’s lawyer, Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen  had filed the Certificate of Readiness as per The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Order upon conclusion of the 129 application. Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen failed to follow the very Order she had obtained through a motion and was in contempt of Court on March 16, 2001. Evidence will show that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had a search warrant issued against Donald H. Broder on his personal residence then incarcerated him in April 23 – May 5, 2004 for not following the March 2004 Court Order issued by the trial Judge Justice Bielby. The Edmonton and Calgary Law Courts have since been made aware that it was Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen that was in contempt of Court at a much earlier date then Donald H. Broder and refuse to incarcerate her on Contempt Charges but rather Justice Karen Horner at Calgary Law Courts told Donald H. Broder it was to late to enforce the Court order Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen had not followed and dismissed the court action brought against her for Fraud on the Courts. 

Why: Robert Sawers let Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen set a deadline by way of Court Order to close the pleading’s on herself on or before March 15, 2001 prior to filing with The Surrogate Courts the application for Probate knowing that the time allowed by Wachowich for the outstanding Alberta Rules of Court 129 Application within Action 9703-12949 as no Personal Representatives had been formally appointed by the Surrogate Courts so the claim was frivolous. vexatious, and abuse of the process of court and without Personal Representatives named as Plaintiffs the current Plaintiff’s did not have standing to sue on behalf of the deceased Edmund Broder’s Estate. “case law referred to during the 129 application was; “Mugford vs. Mugford” Newfoundland Court of Appeal.”  

2001 – April – Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen made the comment she had been ambushed; and it is alleged that it was her Father, Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore, inclusive of his Alberta Justice Department friends, Law Firms, and Lawyer in Edmonton. Alberta , Canada conspired to frame an innocent senior citizen by orchestrating the outcome of Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949 as stated below;

In order for Action 9703-12949 to proceed Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen required substantial assistance from The Alberta Justice Department by; past Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore “her father”, Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich, Master Quinn, Justice C. P. Clarke, Justice Veit, Justice Bielby and The Alberta Court of Appeal  Justices; Carole Conrad, Ronald Berger, and Peter Costigan. Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen would also require the assistance of Donald Broder’s own lawyer Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson to participate in concealing from the trial Judge that the Pleadings were closed on March 15, 2001 prior to the Personal Representatives being appointed and substituted as Plaintiff’s.  Then Elizabeth MacInnis still had to obtain assistance from Bryan Kickham, Donald H. Broder’s defence lawyer to file an Amended  Statement of Defence to conceal from the trial judge that the issue of standing had been raised within paragraph 8 of The Original Statement of Defence filed on July 28, 1997 willfully acting in a conspiracy to frame, defraud and at the orchestrated  the outcome of the trial causing his own client an innocent senior citizen to be wrongfully imprisoned for 11 days in the Edmonton Remand Center by;

  • Master Quinn purposely delayed his decision to provide Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen time to apply for Probate before the Pleadings close.
  • Master Quinn then made his decision that an Appeal would be absolutely necessary to purposely delay the closing of the Pleadings and buy more time for Elizabeth MacInnis to apply for probate.
  • Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen made the Application for Probate during the Justice Departments orchestrated delay that way the copy of the Application for Probate sent to Robert Sawers for information purposes would be considered effective service on Donald H. Broder.
  • The Appeal of Master Quinn’s Order was heard before Justice C. P. Clarke he also cooperates with Elizabeth MacInnis and her father past Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore and orders to add the Personal Representatives as Plaintiff’s to Action 9703-12949 without a formal Notice of Motion as per the Alberta Rules of Court Rule 133 Application purposely and knowingly that excess of the two year limitation period to add or substitute a new party had lapsed within The Court of Queens Bench action 9703-12949. 

Did You Know! Elizabeth MacInnis convinced Donald Broder’s new Lawyer, Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson to get the word amended on the Statement of Defence before the trial to conceal from the trial Judge that the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives had been raised within the Original Statement of Defence, because if the trial Judge becomes aware the issue of standing had been raised at the beginning within the original statement of defence. “Estoppel” would prevent her from relying on the relation back doctrine” for which was necessary to be relied on by the Plaintiff’s Lawyer, Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen to win the Lawsuit.

The balance of the Dateline will expose the willful criminal actions committed by

The Alberta Justice Department, Justices willfully conspiring with Lawyers to

orchestrate the outcome of Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949 therefore

deliberately framing and defrauding an innocent

75 year old Canadian Senior Citizen;

Note: The Surrogate Court Tab – references from this point in the dateline and provides evidence that;

  • A Correspondence was written by Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen on May 10, 2001 to Donald Broder and Craig Broder’s Lawyer Robert Sawers of R. J. Sawers and Associates confirming she would serve Donald Broder directly with the Application for Probate and the Notice to Beneficiaries and only provide Robert Sawers of R. J. Sawers and Associates with a copy for information purposes.
  • Donald Broder’s confirms with a proof of receipt from Canada Post that he was served by Registered Mail on May 28, 2001 with the Application for Probate and the Notice to Beneficiaries four days after the Grant of Administration had Ordered within Surrogate Courts Action SES03-113567 on May 24, 2001.
  • The false Affidavit of Service for the Application for Probate sworn by Joan C. Hill legal secretary of Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen confirmed that based on a note to file Robert Sawers has confirmed had had received the copy was not to be considered as effective service as per the Alberta Rules of Court.
  • Robert Sawers of R. J. Sawers and Associates swore an Affidavit that he did not accept service for the Application for Probate and the Notice to Beneficiaries as he had not been retained by Donald Broder for the pending Estate Litigation as he was only on the record for Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949 for which the Pleadings were closed.
  • Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen was in breach of the Legal Profession Act as she was against Donald Broder within Action 9703-12949 and was in a conflict position by acting for the Estate for which he was a beneficiary.

2001 – May 24Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen made an application for probate and relied on a false Affidavit of Service filed by her own legal secretary, Joan C. Hill;  that was base on a memo to file Donald Broder’s Lawyer – Robert Sawers had confirmed he had received the copy of the Application for Probate for information purposes as effective service.

 

False Affidavit of service filed by Joan C. Hill legal secretary of Elizabeth MacInnis.

Note: Under “DATE OF AFFIDAVIT” December 6, 2001

Shouldn’t the Affidavit of Service be filed before

The Application for Probate was heard at

The Surrogate Courts May 24, 2001?

May 28, 2001 – Donald Broder was not served by registered mail until May 28, 2001 four days after the application was heard and the Grant of Administration was Ordered on May 24, 2001.

 2001 – May 24 – Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen obtained the Grant of Administration at the Surrogate Courts within Action SES03 113567 appointing two of the Plaintiffs as Personal Representatives, even though she was now in a conflict position as per the Legal Profession Act and should not represent the Estate. “Now that she had the Personal Representatives appointed she would need assistance from the Alberta Justice Department to add them as Plaintiffs within action 9703-12949 after the Limitation Period had expired as per Alberta Limitation of Actions Act.”

2001 – June – Donald Broder and Craig Broder’s Lawyer Robert Sawers of R. J. Sawers and Associates warned Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen he has serious concerns with what she was doing. Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen was in Contempt of Court as of March 16, 2001 within Action 9703-12949 for not filing the Certificate of Readiness as Ordered by Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich on or before March 15, 2001.

2001 – Terrorism is committed against CUPE – Canadian Union of Public Employees –  The Clerk of The Court afraid for their jobs are told to shut up and do what their told.

“KEEP FILING PLEADING”

Ignore The Chief Justice Wachowich Court Order!

******************************************************

Terrorism also was committed in 2001 by;

The Federal Government of Canada

and

The Provincial Government of Alberta

against

 vulnerable 75 year old

Canadian senior citizens!

Donald H. Broder and Joyce M Broder.

******************************************************************************************************************************

2001 – 9/11 – New York – The World Trade Center terrorist attacks and The Democracies of the free world inclusive of Canada unite to end terrorism but The Alberta and Federal Government of Canada specifically The Alberta Justice Department continues to commit terror on one of their own by conspiring, acting in collusion to orchestrate the outcome of action 9703-12949 and successfully frame an innocent senior citizen.

Note: The Orchestrated Trial Tabreferences from this point in the dateline will provide evidence that after Elizabeth MacInnis made the comment she had been ambushed by Robert Sawers, The Alberta Justice Department, Justices and Lawyers all heard her call for help and colluded to provided assistance to Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen with willful actions of conspiracy to defraud an innocent Senior Citizen by acting in collusion to orchestrate the outcome of the trial of Action 9703-12949 by the willful actions of;

  • Master Quinn providing Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen with an avenue to make a successful application to the Surrogate Courts and obtaining the Grant of Administration to appoint two of the Plaintiff’s as Personal Representatives on May 24, 2001 denying Donald Broder of his Constitutional Rights by placing a gag order on him not to interfere.
  • Justice C. P. Clarke on November 2, 2001 circumvented the Alberta Rules of Court during the Appeal of Master Quinn by winking at Robert Sawers while ordering that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had leave of the Court to Amended the Amended Statement of Claim and add the Personal Representatives as Plaintiff’s within Action 9703-12949 without a formal Court Application as it was now over 4 years since the July 8, 1997 Statement of Claim had been filed for which was clearly outside the Statute of Limitations 2 year deadline to add or substitute a new Plaintiff as per Alberta New Limitation Act for which prejudiced Donald Broder and Craig Broder’s defence and denied them of their Constitutional Rights. This leads Donald Broder firing Robert Sawers and Guy Lacourciere of Lacourciere and Associates is retained to acted on behalf of the Defendants Donald and Craig Broder.
  • Guy Lacourciere of Lacourciere and Associates immediately colludes with Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen by participating in a second round of Case Management meeting whereby Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen misled Justice Marceau that the conditional Certificate of Readiness had been filed on April 17, 2003 willful concealing from Justice Marceau that the Order of Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich had directed the Certificate of Readiness be filed on or before March 15, 2001 and that Elizabeth MacInnis was in Contempt of Court. Guy Lacouciere filed a Cease to Act on October 30 2003 – 2 1/2 month prior to the schedule trial within the said of January 19 – 23, 2004 as he had cooperated with Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen during a case management meeting with Justice Marceau in by allowing her to be granted a Court Order to have Donald Broder place the trophy in his office for which he aware Donald Broder could not adhere too.
  • Bill Kenny of Miller Thomson for whom provided the reference that he had spoken with Bryan Kickham in his office and that Donald Broder should make contact to retain him to act on his his behalf and represent him at the scheduled trial of January 19 – 23, 2004.
  • Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson acting on behalf of Donald Broder colluded with Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen by obtaining permission from the Courts “FIAT” on January 9, 2004 to Amend the Statement of Defence, 10 days before the scheduled trial of January 19 – 23, 2004 backdating it to January 9, 2003 to a per-conditional Certificate of Readiness April 17, 2003 date forges Justice Breitkriez second signature knowingly that the word Amended on the Statement of Defence would ensure it takes total precedence at trial to purposely conceal from the trial Judge that paragraph 8 within The Original Statement of Defence filed on July 28, 1997 raised the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives and the Statement of Defence to the Amended Statement of Claim had raised Estoppel thereby colluding and framing his own client Donald Broder by assisting Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen to Orchestrate the outcome and ensure that Estoppel would not prevent her from relying on the Principle of Relation Back and that would ensure her winning the trial within action 9703-12949.
  • The official transcripts of Guy Lacourciere ‘s cross examination of his affidavit provided evidence that when a Statement of Defence is Amended it becomes total precedence and that the pleadings on record for the trial Judge would only included the Amended Statement of Defence and not include the Original Statement of Defence or the Statement of Defence to the Amended Statement of Claim.
  • Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson also made the request that he should call Donald Broder and Craig Broder’s first lawyer on the record Joseph Kueber of Bryan and Company to testify at trial for which was also orchestrated as Joseph Kueber brought to Court two irrelevant Pre-Statement of Claim correspondences purposely not bringing the two Post-Statement of Claim correspondences that also raise the issue of standing/ lack of Personal Representatives.
  • Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen misleads “perjury” Justice Myra Bielby during the closing arguments of the trial when asked as to the first time the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives was raised; answers early 2001 during the jury trial application before Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich, knowingly that it had been raised within the Original Statement of Defence on July 28, 1997 and also was raised within two October 1997 correspondences issued by Joseph Kueber of Bryan and Company.

2001 – November – Robert Sawers explains immediately after my 129 appeal of Master Quinn’s order that Justice C. P. Clarke was winking as he ordered that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen could add the Personal Representatives as Plaintiffs without a Court Application purposely favoring Elizabeth MacInnis by circumventing the Alberta Rules of Court Rule 133 for which must be followed to add or substitute an new party to an action “The Personal Representatives.” Justice C. P. Clarke knowingly was assisting Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen to add the Personal Representatives prior to the Pleadings being closed at the conclusion of the 129 Appeal. Circumventing the Rules of Court to favor Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen by not requiring an Application to add new Plaintiff. Justice C. P. Clarke acted in collusion for which prejudiced Donald Broder and Craig Broder’s defence as the deadline of the two year limitation period as legislated within the Statute; Alberta’s “New Limitation of Actions Act” adopted March 1, 1999 which defines a deadline of two years to add or substitute a new Plaintiff. Case Law: Rocklake Enterprises vs. Timberjack

2001 – November – Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen obtained the assistance of the Justice Department specifically Justice C. P. Clarke to amend the Amended Statement of Claim and add the Personal Representatives as Plaintiffs within action 9703-12949 in excess of 3 years after the original Statement of Claim file date of July 8, 1997 and during the Defendant’s Donald Broder and Craig Broder’s Appeal of Master Quinn decision. Willfully circumventing that the expiration of the Limitation Period of 2 years had lapsed to add or substitute a new Plaintiff within the said action.

2001 – December – Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen has her legal secretary Joan C. Hill file a false and misleading Affidavit of Service for Surrogate Court Action SES03 113567.

Note: See the Surrogate Court Tab: Paragraph 3 of the Affidavit of Service. Quote: “I am informed from a review of a memo to file dated May 15, 201 the relevant portion of which is attached as Exhibit “B” from the May 14, 2001 time sheet, the relevant portion of which is attached as Exhibit “C” and by Elizabeth MacInnis and do verily believe that Mr. Sawers advised Elizabeth M. MacInnis on May 14, 2001 that he ad received the copy of the Application for the Grant of Administration which was sent to him.” Robert Sawers had only agreed to accept a copy for information purposes because the pleadings were closed within Action 9703-12949 for which he was retained a defence council for Donald Broder and Craig Broder, and effective service would have to be directly on all the Beneficiaries inclusive of Donald Broder. Elizabeth MacInnis was in a conflict position and should have not been allowed to represent the Estate in a non bias and non prejudiced manner after she had been in a litigation against Donald Broder for over 4 1/2 years and just force the pleadings closed on herself by way of Court Order.

2002- January – Robert Sawers was fired because Donald Broder and Craig Broder were upset thinking he had been served for the Application for Probate and did not notify us. The evidence will prove the Pleadings were closed within Action 9703-12949 on March 15, 2001 prior to the Application for Probate and Robert Sawers had only agreed to be provided a copy of the Notice to Beneficiaries and The Application for the Grant of Administration for information purposes.

2002 – January – Guy Lacourciere of Lacourciere Cervini replaced Robert Sawers of R. J. Sawers and Associates as defence council for the Defendants, Donald Broder and Craig Broder.

2002 – November 2 – Guy Lacourciere correspondence to Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen suggesting she confirm if anyone in her office is speaking to the judges, their staff, or the clerks, behind the Broders backs.

*******Guy Lacourciere – November 2, 2002 correspondence to Elizabeth MacInnis alleging that someone from Weir Bowen was speaking to judges, their staff , or the clerks. (PDF full version)

2002 – November – Guy Lacourciere files a Statement of Defence to the Amended Amended Statement of Claim and raises within the Defence Pleadings “Estoppel” but willfuly conceals the Wachowich Order had closed the Pleadings on March 15, 2001 prior to the Application for Probate and the Personal Representatives being substituted as Plaintiff’s within action 9703-12949.

Note: Guy Lacourciere does not Amend the Original Statement of Defence but rather files a second Statement of Defence to the Amended Amended Statement of Claim because at trial the trial Judge would be able to see that the issue of standing was raised within the Original Statement of Defence and that Estoppel had been raised within the Statement of Defence to the Amended Amended Statement of Claim. This procedure was to ensure the trial Judge would be privy to having on the record as per Alberta Rules of Court Rule 239 both the Original Statement of Defence and the Statement of Defence to the Amended Amended Statement of Claim for the Courts to be made aware of all the issues that had been raised as Defence Pleadings.

Note: If the Statement of Defence had been Amended it would become total precedence and the Trial Judge would not have on the record the Original Statement of Defence. “See Guy Lacourciere’s cross-examination.”

2003 – May 7Elizabeth MacInnis misleads Justice Marceau that; “The Certificate of Readiness” had been filed on April 17, 2003, while all along it was Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen that obtained a Court Order from Justice J. L. Lewis to  file The Certificate of Readiness and close the Pleading by February 15, 2001 immediately following the; “Jury Trial Application” that went before Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich on February 13, 2001. As per the Defendants lawyer Robert Sawers  request The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich extended the time to file The Certificate of Readiness to;  “on or before March 15, 2001” immediately following the Defendants 129 Application; challenging the issue of lack of standing as the action 9703-12949 lacked standing in Court only Personal Representative had the right to bring an action and at this time Probate had never been applied for and as such Personal Representatives did not exist and as such the Plaintiff’s in their personal capacity lacked standing to sue on behalf of a deceased. Supporting case law was provided “Mugford vs. Mugford”

The Wachowich Order was never followed and

Guy Lacourciere lawyer for the Defendant

Donald Broder and Craig Broder

allowed Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

lawyer for the Plaintiffs to mislead

Justice Marceau by confirming

The Certificate of Readiness

had been filed on April 17, 2003.

See below. 

  2003 – May 22 – Elizabeth MacInnis files a new Statement of Claim on behalf of the Beneficiaries at the Edmonton Law Courts May 22, 2003, two days before the two year limitation period expires from the time Probate was granted on May 24, 2001, leaves it in abeyance and never serves it in the event she is caught and forced to close the pleadings within the said  action on March 15, 2001 before the Application for Probate and The Statement of Claim within Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949 is struck.

2003 – Guy Lacourciere of Lacourciere Associates and Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen suggests that the Trophy be put on e bay to get a value Don Shaufler from Innis Montana is the highest bidder.

2003 – Don Shaufler contacts Donald H Broder and an agreement to lease The Broder Buck with a conditional sale for $171,000 US is made.

2003 – October – Guy Lacourciere files a cease to act because Donald Broder refuses to place the Trophy in his office and purposely leaves Donald Broder and Craig Broder without a lawyer just 3 month before the scheduled trial.

1) – Guy Lacourciere is aware the Pleadings were closed March 15, 2001 before Personal Representatives were appointed at the Surrogate Courts and as such were not named as Plaintiff’s within the said action.

2) Guy Lacourciere is aware the Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen with the assistance of Justice C. P. Clarke substituted the Personal Representatives the said action as Plaintiff’s in November of 2001, excess of 4 years since the original Statement of Claim filed date of July 8, 1997 for which breached the Limitation of Actions Act specified 2 year limitation period to add or substitute a new Plaintiff. 

3) – Guy Lacourciere also filed a second Statement of Defence that plead “Estoppel” to The Amended Amended Statement of Claim so the trial Judge must see both the Original Statement of Defence that raised the issue of lack of Personal Representatives in order for “Estoppel” to prevent Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen from relying on The Relation Back Doctrine to win the lawsuit.   

“So you asked why did Donald H. Broder lose the lawsuit”

2003 – NovemberWithout legal representation Donald Broder calls Bill Kenny of Miller Thomson’s and is referenced to call Bryan Kicham of Miller Thomson to act on his behalf for the scheduled trial of January 19, – 23, 2004.

2003 – December Joseph Kueber of Bryan and Company is successful in obtaining a summary dismissal for Craig Broder as a means of protection for his own family.

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen needs another lawyer to act on behalf of Donald H Broder so she can get away with what she is up to!

That easy lets see how hard it was for Donald H. Broder to hire a lawyer that was against him right from the minute the retainer check was cashed!

Bryan Kickham from Miller Thomson

to the rescue

his ambition

to cash the retainer check

and go to work against you immediately.

Let’s clarify what

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

needed

Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson

to do.

*******************************************************

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen new she couldn’t ask

Donald H. Broder to

obtain a FIAT  “Permission to Amend the Statement of Defence” on

 January 9, 2004

back date the FIAT on the front page of The Amended Statement of Defence to

January 9, 2003 

to predate the false Certificate of Readiness file date of

April 17, 2003

and forge the second judge signature below the false date added in below the

FIAT

*************************************************************************

2004 – January 9 Donald Broder’s lawyer, Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson goes to work against his own client and obtains a FIAT on January 9, 2004

just 10 days before the schedule trial date of January 19, 2004 

Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson proceeds to;

Amend the Statement of Defence and backdates the FIAT “permission to amend” it to January 9, 2003 prior to the false Certificate of Readiness date of April 17, 2003 for the sole purpose the Amended Statement of Defence would take total precedence at the trial and then the trial Judge;

Justice Bielby would not know that the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives had been raised within paragraph 8 of;

The Original Statement of Defence 

as the Amended Statement of Defence is a replica of the Statement of Defence to The Amended Amended Statement of Claim for which

Estoppel had been plead.

Bryan Kickham had to get the word Amended on the Statement of Defence

This act of Fraud was committed by Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson

shortly after he cashed the retainer check provided to him by Donald H. Broder. 

FYI

Bryan Kickhams mug shot again!

amendedsodfiat

Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson was retained by Donald H. Broder in November 0f 2003 immediately following

Guy Lacourciere filing a cease to act on October 30. 2003.

Below – The Procedural Record Print proving the true date the FIAT was granted by the Courts!

recordprintfiat

WHY YOU ASK!

Guy Lacourciere being cross examined on his Affidavit, confirms in line 19 – 27.

crossexamp42

The Amended Statement of Defence takes total precedence at trial and for Estoppel to prevent Elizabeth MacInnis from relying on the Relation Back Doctrine the trial judge would have to see the Original Satement of Defence and the Statement of Defence to the Amended Amended Statement of Claim. Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson, Donald H. Broder’s own lawyer just make sure the trial Judge; Justice Bielby would not see The Original Statement of Defence and only see the Amended Statement of Defence. These actions of Donald H. Broder’s own defence lawyer; Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson just ensured the Plaintiff’s lawyer; Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen would win at trial by ensuring the trial Judge would only see the issues raised within the Amended Statement of Defence and therefore; 

1. Concealing from the trial Judge; Justice Bielby as to the first time the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives was raised ‘ frivolous, vexatious and abuse of the court process” was contained within paragraph 8 of the Original Statement of Defence for which was filed on July 28, 1997.

2. Knowingly that Estoppel had been plead within the Statement of Defence to the Amended Amended Statement of Claim and would not be effective unless the trial Judge saw that the issue of standing had been raised within the Original Statement of Defence.

Page 28 Cross Examination of Guy Lacourciere on his Affidavit

Provides proof that

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

committed perjury when asked by

The Trial Judge Justice Bielby;

When was the first time the Defendants raised the issue of Lack of Personal Representatives?

Guy Lacourciere also admits he told the

Alberta Court of Appealline 1 – 11

crossexampage28

See below;

 Justice Bielby asks;

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

during closing arguments at trial on January 23, 2004;

When was the first time the defendants raised the issue of lack of personal representatives?

 See line 30 below;Argumentsbymacinnis2

 Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen commited perjury;

“as the first time the issue of lack of Personal Representatives was raised was not;”

“early 2001”

but plead within the;

Original Statement of Defence filed within the said action on July 28, 1997.Argumentsbymacinnis3

2004 – January 9 – Donald Broder’s Lawyer Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson does not ensure that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen files a copy of all the Pleading on the record for the Trial Judge Justice Bielby as per “Alberta Rules of Court Rule 239”, purposely allowing Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen to conceal “The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Order”, whereby it would have provided the trial Judge Justice Bielby the knowledge that the Pleadings within the said action were closed on March 15, 2001 well before the Application for Probate to appoint Personal Representatves had been filed within Surrogate Court Action SES 113567 in May, 2001 then proceded to a desk application and granted on May 24, 2001.

2004 – January 9Just 10 days before the commencement of the scheduled trial January 19, 2004 within Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action No: 9703-12949 ; Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen with the assistance of The Alberta Justice Department inclusive of past Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore, Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich, Justice C. P. Clarke “Alberta Court of Appeal” for whom substituted the Personal Representatives as Plaintiff’s after the applicable limitation period had expired, Justice Belzil “Surrogate Court” for whom granted probate without confirmation on file that Donald H. Broder was served  and Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson “Donald Broders own Lawyer” for whom had colluded and conspired to successfully orchestrate the trial books and conceal the original Statement of Defence from the trial Judge; Justice Bielby collaborating to ensure the outcome of Broder vs. Broder Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action No:  9703-12949 was in favor of the daughter past Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore – Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore. 

2004 – January 10 – Donald Broder receives a phone call from his defence lawyer; Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson for whom explains that they have no defence and will lose at trial, so Donald H. Broder fires him immediately, with panic in his voice; Bryan Kickhams responds “you fired me” and he is told by Donald Broder “I do not need a lawyer if I am going to lose”.

2004 – January 10 – The Orchestration of the Trial is achieved by The Alberta Justice Department, Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen and Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson and conspiracy between all involved to frame an innocent senior citizen, Action 9703-12949 has been successfully orchestrated to frame Donald Broder by the willful involvement of his own defence Lawyer Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson.

2004 – January 15- Guy Lacourciere of Lacourciere Cervini / Associates agrees to assist by phone with the trial, edits opening and closing statements by fax and is to provide direction and then also participates in this conspiracy to frame Donald Broder by concealing pertinent information that the Certificate of Readiness for which closed the Pleadings within the said action on March 15, 2001 was ordered by Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich and that the Original Statement of Defence had raised the issue of standing, lack of Personal Representatives and that the Amended Statement of Defence filed by Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson on January 9, 2004 backdated to January 9, 2003 to predate the false Certificate of Readiness date of April 17, 2003 and was purposeful and with intent to frame and defraud his own client Donald H. Broder by concealing that;  “the issues of lack of Personal Representatives had been raised within the Original Statement of Defence on July 28, 1997” from the trial Judge; Justice Myra Bielby.

2004 – January 19 – Craig Broder is granted permission of the Courts to speak for Donald Broder during the trial. 2004 – January 19 – Craig Broder reads Donald Broder’s Opening Statements immediately following the Opening Statements as delivered by Elizabeth MacInnis.

2004 – January 19 – 23 -Donald Broder and Craig Broder do not know that the trial Judge Justice Bielby would not be privy to see the Original Statement of Defence and the Statement of Defence to the Amended Statement of Claim, and that the Amended Statement of Defence would take total precedence.

2004 – January 20 – Joseph Kueber of Bryan and Company brings two pre-statement of Claim correspondences to the Law Courts to testify too purposely not bringing the two post-statement of claim correspondences that raised the issue of standing as per Alberta Rules of Court Rule 129.

2004 – January – Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson has succesfuly colluded with Joseph Kueber of Bryan & Company’s to orchestrated his testimony at the trial to include irrelevant April 1997 – pre-July 8, 1997 Statement of Claim correspondencs purposely to conceal correspondences issued in October 1997 – post-July 8, 1997 Statement of Claim that also raised the issue of standing, Alberta Rules of Court Rule 129.

2004 – January 23 – During the closing arguments of the trial; Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen misleads the presiding trial Judge Justice Bielby when questioned as to the first time the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives was raised, Elizabeth MacInnis provides an answer to Justice Bielby early 2001 during the Jury Trial Application and as the evidence will prove it was plead within the Original Statement of Defence, July 28, 1997 – paragraph 8, and also raised within two Correspondences in October 1997.

2004 – March – Justice Bielby comment within her reasons for decision that the Personal Representatives are entitle to the trophy base on “the principle of relation back.” 2004 – MarchJustice Bielby also makes the comment within her reasons for decision of the trial that:

[82] ” The Defendant led evidence from then counsel, Joseph Kueber to the effect that Mr. Kueber wrote to Plaintiff’s counsel in April, 1997 advising that he would advance a limitations defence but neither of his letters expressly raised the issue of the Plaintiffs’ standing to sue at that time which, in any case, was before the original Statement of Claim was filed. Therefore, those letters create no estoppel which would prevent the application of the principle of relation back.

Early April 2004Elizabeth MacInnis obtains a Court order to send a Sheriff George Butler escorted by the Sundre RCMP and a local locksmith to Donald Broder residence with instruction to search the premises – and do whatever it takes to break down doors, open locks and seize the Broder Buck. When they arrive unannounced only Joyce Broder is home already in early stages of Dementia and Alzheimer’s she lets them in without any resistance. A replica of the Broder Buck is on the dining room table and George Butler seizes it then leaves. Elizabeth MacInnis has a taxidermist look at the Broder Buck and it is determined it is a replica then she has Donald Broder served to appear in court on April 23, 2004 to face contempt of court charges for not following the trial Judge Justice Bielby’s, March 2004 Court Order to turn over the Broder Buck.

2004 – April 23 –  Donald Broder was served to appear in court on April 23, 2004 to face possible Contempt of Court charges whereby Elizabeth MacInnis requests the Justice Bielby should teach Donald Broder a lesson and incarcerates him until he obeys  2004 Court Order to turn over the Broder Buck to he office of Elizabeth MacInnis that followed the January 19 – 23, 2004 trial, when all along it was Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen that was in Contempt of Court for not following the Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Court Order that compelled her to file the Certificate of Readiness within the said action on of before March 15, 2001 that would have closed the Pleadings before she had applied for Probate to appoint Personal Representatives and as such the litigation had no standing and would be dismissed.    

Excerpts from the April 23, 2004 hearing:  THE COURT – Justice Bielby says: Excuse me. Let me finish. I will however direct in light of your age that your son Craig Broder can take your place in custody, should he choose to do so. I also direct that you be brought back before me at 9:30 next Monday morning, which is the 27th – is it — of April. Ms. MACINNIS: That would be the 26th, I believe, My Lady.

2004 – April 23False imprisonment Ordered by; Justice Myra Bielby as of against Donald H. Broder on alleged contempt of court charges for not following her 2004 Court Order to return the trophy, knowingly as per Alberta Rules of Court Rule 239, whereby the trial Judge was to have been provided with a copy of all the pleadings prior to the commencement of the trial and should have be aware it was Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen that had not followed the 2001 Court Order of the Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich that closed the pleadings on March 15, 2001 and prior to the Application for Probate and the Grant of Administration on May 24, 2001 appointing Personal Representatives.

2004 – April 23 – Friday – Donald H. Broder is taken into custody and locked up in the Edmonton Remand Centre, finally gets to call out at 12:00 noon on Saturday, reaches his son to explain he has not been provide with a meal or allowed to see a Medical Doctor for his medication to be re-prescribed. He is held in custody for 11 days, and brought back before Justice Myra Bielby as per her direction.

2004 – April 26 – Monday – “Donald H. Broder is brought back before Justice Myra Bielby at 10:00 AM and when his son Craig Broder tries to address Justice Bielby about the Justice Department and Lawyers abusing a senior citizen and also about Justice Myra Bielby speaking or making suggestion with regards to Craig Broder taking his Fathers place in Jail without the respect to request his attendance and speak to him directly. Justice Bielby tells Craig Broder that he need not come back to the Courts.”

2004 – April 29 – Justice Bielby also ordered that: “The Clerk of the Court is directed to have the transcript of the evidence given by Donald Broder and Craig Broder at the trial, and of this day’s proceedings prepared and referred to the Attorney General with a request for an investigation into possible criminal charges that could be laid against Don Broder and Craig Broder for purgery, obstruction of justice or any other appropriate charges.”

2004 May 4 – While Donald Broder was incarcerated at The Edmonton Remand Center for alleged contempt of Court charges held for 11 days without being read his miranda rights; Guy Lacourciere makes contact with Donald Broder’s wife Joyce Broder and convinces her to transfer $235,000 Cad. from Toronto Dominion Bank in Olds, Alberta to Lacourciere Cervini’s Canada Trust Account in Calgary,  Alberta to purchase the trophy back and when the buyer refuses to sell it back, Guy Lacourciere turns the money over to Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen when there was a Court Order to turn the money over to Donald Broder criminal Lawyer Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham and at this time Justice Myra Bielby releases Donald Broder from custody. 

2004 – Justice Bielby also fines Donald Broder $53,000 for uncooperating with her February – 2004 Court Order to turn over the Trophy to The Personal Representatives but does not disclose that it was Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen that had not followed an the March 15, 2001 deadline as Ordered by Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich to closed the pleadings within action 9703-12949 prior to the Application for Probate to appoint Personal Representatives at the Surrogate Courts and as such the plaintiffs within the said action did not have standing to sue as they had no legal or equitable right to the possession only personal representatives have such a right.   

2004 – May – While Donald Broder is being held in custody; Guy Lacourciere resumes acting as legal council for Donald Broder without obtaining permission protecting the matter from going criminal as Donald Broder had retained a criminal lawyer Marvin Bloos from Beresh Depoe Cunningham for whom also takes thousands of dollars and willfuly conceals thereby concealing the important information from his own client Donald Broder.  

2004May -The Edmonton Law Courts / Alberta Justice Department holds an auction to sell the defrauded property and it is resold to the same American citizen; Don Shauffler from Innis, Montana USA for an additional $55,000 US for a total sum paid by Don Shauffler of $225,000 US, excess of $320,000 Cdn of which all the proceeds were turned over to Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen. Elizabeth MacInnis was going to have a great payday considering she was the lawyer that made the comment that she had been ambushed by Donald Broders lawyer Robert Sawers in March of 2001. Elizabeth MacInnis then deducted $150,000 for legal costs against the proceeds of the Estate of Edmund Broder. The orchestration of Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949 has concluded and all the siblings of the entire Broder family have also now been ambushed by The Alberta Justice Department in order to protect a Lawyer; Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen because she had closed the pleading on herself on March 15, 2001 before she applied for probate to appoint Personal Representatives on May 24, 2001.

2004 – May – The Federal Government of Canada and The Progressive Conservative Provincial Government of Alberta have just completed a sale of stolen personal property “the trophy” for which all Justices and Masters involved conspired with Lawyers to extort from Edmund Broder “deceased” to an innocent American Citizen, Don Shauffler from Innis, Montana for a total sum of $225,000 US. As the evidence will prove, The Alberta Justice Ministers past and present inclusive of Alison Redford have played The United States Government by standing on the sidelines and now knowing of the fraudulent activities of The Alberta Justice Department and now an innocent citizen of The United States of America, Don Shauffler from Innis Montana is in possession of stolen property. 

Note: The Alberta Court of Appeal Tab references from this point in the dateline and provides evidence that; Guy Lacourciere had been rehired to act for Donald Broder and file an Appeal of Justice Bielby’s with The Alberta Court of Appeal. Alberta Appeal Court Justices; Carole Conrad, Peter Costigan and Ronald Berger;

Were made aware by Donald Broder’s Lawyer Guy Lacourciere within the Appeal Books that conspiracy to defraud Donald Broder had taken place by his own Lawyers acting in collusion with the Plaintiff’s Lawyer Elizabeth MacInnis to orchestrate the outcome of the trial within Action 9703-12949 and also chose to be willful participants within this act of conspiracy to defraud an innocent senior citizen by depriving Donald Broder of his Constitutional Rights by purposely disregarding the evidence that was before them had proved that;

  • The Original Statement of Defence filed on July 28, 1997 as contained within paragraph 8 had raised the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives and that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had committed purgery when she was asked during the closing arguments of the trial on January 23, 2004 by Justice Bielby when the first time the Defendants raised the issue of lack of Personal Representatives and Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen provide the answered “early 2001.”
  • The Statement of Defence to the Amended Amended Statement of Claim filed by Guy Lacourciere in November 2002 had plead Estoppel .
  • An Amended Statement of Defence was filed by Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson being granted a FIAT “permission to amend” on January 9, 2004 – backdating it to January 9, 2003 his own willful actions to conspire to defraud his own client knowing that the Amended Statement of Defence would take total precedence at trial and conceal the issues that were raised within the Original Statement of Defence and the Statement of Defence to the Amended Amended Statement of Claim.
  • The Personal Representatives had been add / substituted as Plaintiff’s within Action 9703-12949 outside the 2 year applicable limitation periods allowed under the New Limitation of Action Act adopted March 1, 1999.
  • Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson and Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had orchestrated a false contempt charge against an innocent senior citizen which lead to wrongful imprisonment, torture and conspiracy to defraud him thereby depriving him of his human dignity until he succumbed to The Alberta Justice Departments demands.

The Alberta Appeal Court Justices; Carole Conrad, Peter Costigan, and Ronald Berger let Donald Broder off on the alleged contempt of Court Charge based on a technicality then reduced his fine from $53,000. that was imposed against him by Justice Bielby to $28,500. Contained within the Cross-Examination of Guy Lacourciere he made the statement that the Appeal Courts had made comment that Elizabeth MacInnis had been ambushed and he said to the Appeal Courts no one was ambushed because the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives was raised within the Original Statement of Defence.

  • The Alberta Appeal Court Justices Carole Conrad, Peter Costigan, and Ronald Berger also conspired to defraud an innocent senior citizen and depriving him of his Constitutional Rights by acting in collusion by not exposing the fraud on the Courts being committed by Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen and Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson.
  • The Alberta Justice Department / Transcript Management deleted Donald Broder’s opening statements off the trial audio.
  • The Alberta Justice Department / Transcript Management purposely excluded the Orders of Justice J. L. Lewis and Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich from the Alberta Court of Appeal Books.

2004 – Guy Lacourciere is retained to file an Appeal with the Alberta Court of Appeal, and includes in the Appeal Books; the Original Statement of Defence that raised the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives and the Statement of Defence to the Amended Amended Statement of Claim for which had plead Estoppel and also the transcripts of the closing Arguments of the trial from January 23, 2004 whereby evidence had been provided to the Alberta Court of Appeal that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had committed Purgery with her answer to Justice Bielby as to the first time the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives was raise. The presiding Justices; Justice Carole Conrad, Ronald Berger, and Peter Costigan acting bias, prejudiced and in collusion with Elizabth MacInnis of Weir Bowen dismiss the contempt charge on a technicality but uphold Justice Bielby’s decision therby redusing the fine against Donald Broder for Court costs associated with the alleged Contempt of Court. Donald Broder had retained a Criminal Lawyer Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham , for whom accepted $20,000 and was also on a milking run against an innocent senior.

See: Cross-Examination of Guy Lacourciere May 26, 2010 (partial version) within the Orchestrated Trial tab. (from Page 28 line 1 – 24)

Q. Did you raise in your submissions — did you raise the issue that the first time lack of personal representatives was raise was not early 2001, which is tab A, page 13, Sawers Motion, but was plead within the original statement of defence?

A. As a matter of fact, it was told to the court of appeal. The comment was made by the court of appeal – well, you ambushed Ms. MacInnis and we said, no, nobody was ambushed in respect to this. The Matter was raised at the beginning in the statement of defence.

Q. What you mean by “‘ambushed Ms. MacInnis.’

A. The court had asked the question.

Q. If we ambushed Elizabeth MacInnis?

A. It appears to us that Ms. MacInnis may have been ambushed by the motion, by Sawyer, in respect to — in respect to the motion that had been filed in 2001. And at that point in time what I had told the court of appeal is that the matter had originally been set out in the statement of defence.

Q. I need some clarification that we ambushed Elizabeth MacInnis.

Mr. Wong: That’s what the court of appeal said. The questions were asked to provide needed evidence that Elizabeth MacInnis had misled the trial Judge Justice Bielby during the closing Arguments of the trial on January 23, 2004.

See: Arguments by Ms. MacInnis at the trial of 9703-12949 of the trial (partial version pages 389, 407 and 408)s 407 & 408 from the Alberta Court of Appeal Books) within the Orchestrated Trial tab Page 407 of the closing arguments by Ms. MacInnis quote;

THE COURT: When is the first time the defendants raised the issue of the lack of personal representatives?

MS. MACINNIS: The application was heard in April of 2001, and I think we were first told about it in around January or February of that year. I could check the correspondence to confirm for sure. I know it was raised when the defendants made application before Chief Justice Wachowich for a jury trial in February of 2001, and he set a deadline in which time they had to make the application.

THE COURT: Okay, So the first time, even in correspondence to you as counsel for the plaintiffs that this issue was raised, was early 2001?

Page 408 of the closing arguments by Ms. MacInnis quote;

MS. MACINNIS: That’s correct, My Lady. I can say that.

THE COURT: Thank you.

**************      Re quote from above     

**************** See: Cross-Examination of Guy Lacourciere May 26, 2010 (partial version) within the Orchestrated Trial tab. (from Page 28 line 1 – 24)

Q. Did you raise in your submissions — did you raise the issue that the first time lack of personal representatives was raise was not early 2001, which is tab A, page 13, Sawers Motion, but was plead within the original statement of defence?

A. As a matter of fact, it was told to the court of appeal. The comment was made by the court of appeal – well, you ambushed Ms. MacInnis and we said, no, nobody was ambushed in respect to this. The Matter was raised at the beginning in the statement of defence.

“The Alberta Court of Appeal Justices Carole Conrad, Ronald Berger and Peter Costigan became aware that Elizabeth MacInnis committed purgery to Justice Bielby, fraud on the courts, and obstruction of justice for which was the direct cause of falsely imprisoning an innocent 75 year old senior citizen, but chose to also conspire and punish Donald Broder for whom was not even aware that his defence lawyer Robert J. Sawers was being accused of ambushing the Plaintiff’s lawyer Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen.” Upon conclusion of the trial and as contained within the Reasons for Judgment of Justice M. B. Bielby it was decided that; See: Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice M. B. Bielby (full version) PDF – within the Orchestrated Trial tab.  Quote; Page 2: This action is nonetheless not statute-barred, nor a nuilty through application of s. 61(1) (b) of the Limitations of Actions Act, R.S.A. 1980, c. L-15 (“the Limitations of Actions Act”) or, alternatively, through application of principle of “relation back”. [82] The Defendant led evidence from his then counsel, Joseph Kueber to the effect that Mr. Kueber wrote to Plaintiffs counsel in April, 1997 advising that he would advance a limitation defence but neither of his letters expressly raised the issue of the Plaintiffs’ standing to sue at that time which, was before the original Statement of Claim was filed. Therefore those letters create no estoppel which would prevent the application of the principle of relation back.

Note: The Supreme Court of Canada Tab references from this point in the dateline and provides evidence that Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunnigham did not inform the Supreme Court of Canada that;

  • The Order to file The Certificate of Readiness for which directed the Pleading be closed on or before March 15, 2001 within action 9703-12949 had not been followed and that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen should have been charged with contempt of Court on March 16, 2001 and not an innocent senior citizen Donald Broder that was framed with a false contempt of Court charge in 2004.
  • Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen obtained The Grant of Administration on May 24, 2001 after a Court Order had set a deadline of March 15, 2001 to file the Certificate of Readiness.
  • Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had mislead Justice Marceau that the conditional Certificate of Readiness had been filed on April 17, 2003.
  • Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen was acting in conflict as she was against Donald Broder within action 9703-12949 for which the pleadings were closed before she applied for probate and for which she would now be acting for Donald Broder as he was also one of the Beneficiaries.
  • Justice C. P. Clarke acted in collusion with Elizabeth MacInnis by adding the Personal Representatives as Plaintiffs within action 9703-12949 and purposely circumvent the pleadings closing and by not following the Alberta Rules of Court as it was without a Court Application a outside the 2 year Limitation Period.
  • Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had committed purgery by misleading the trial Judge Justice Bielby as to the first time the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives was raised was not early 2001 as she confirmed but actually contained within the Original Statement of Defence filed on July 28, 1997, and had it been made known to the trial Judge Estoppel would of prevented Elizabeth MacInnis from winning the litigation by relying on the relation back doctrine.
  • Bryan Kickham conspired to defraud his own client Donald Broder and innocent senior citizen by obtaining a FIAT on January 9, 2004 to Amended the Statement of Defence, backdated the FIAT date to January 9, 2003 and forged the second signature of Justice Breitkreuz for the sole purpose to conceal the Original Statement of defence from the trial Judge Justice Myra Bielby.

2006 Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham was retained by Donald Broder as his criminal lawyer for the alleged contempt of Court charge in 2004 and again to file The Application for Leave to the Supreme Court of Canada and evidence will prove that the only documents he had included on behalf of his client Donald Broder for the Supreme Court to review were;

  • The Original Statement of Defence was included.
  • The Reasons for Judgment of the Honorable Justice Bielby were included.

The Supreme Court of Canada was informed that justice Bielby had made reference within her Reasons for Judgement that had the issue of standing been raised by Joseph Kueber of Bryan and Company post Statement of Claim Estoppel would prevent Elizabeth is from relying on the relation back doctrine, and by The Supreme Court of Canada should have reviewed the Original Statement of Defence and become aware that the issue of standing had been raised in paragraph 8. Note: The Supreme Court of Canada Tab has the complete; Application for Leave filed at The Supreme Court of Canada as provided by the Clerk’s office of The Supreme Court in PDF.. 2006 – April – Marvin Bloos of Beresch Depoe Cunningham confirmed the Supreme Court had dismissed the Application for Leave seems obvious it would not be in the public’s best interest to know what transpired within the Alberta Justice System, and could be detrimental to all case that have been before the Courts in Canada if it was exposed that the The Alberta Justice Departments participated in collusion, purgey, and conspiracy to defraud an innocent Canadian citizen. 2006 – December – Donald Broder sues Robert Sawers alleging negligence that he accepted service for the Application for Probate and did not notify him.

2008 – March – Donald Broder has heart surgery – valve replacement. 2008 – March – Joyce Broder is admitted permanently to a long term care facility with Dementia and Alzheimer’s.

2008 – November – Robert Sawers solicitor informs Donald Broder the Pleading were closed prior to the Application for Probate and that the Defendants Donald Broder and Craig Broder had been milked, and suggests that we look at the true filed copies of all pleadings within the action.

2008 – November 14 – While reviewing the true filed copies within the Court file at the Clerks of the Courts office in the Edmonton Law Courts, the Clerk said; “please don’t blame us we just do what we are told.”

2008 – November 14 – Edmonton Law Courts Clerk’s office while reviewing the true filed copies of the pleadings, Donald Broder see the true filed copy of the Wachowich Order, then realizes the Pleadings were closed on March 15, 2001 before the Application for Probate on May 24, 2001 and that he was suing the least guilty Lawyer, Robert J. Sawers.

2008 – December – Donald Broder completes a review of the Alberta Court of Appeal Books and realizes the Opening Statements as read at the trial on his behalf are missing. Re-orders the transcripts of the first and last day of the trial to find the Opening Statements are still not transcribed. Then I, Donald Broder write to Transcript Management explaining the Opening Statements are missing in the transcribed copy to only receive a letter from Alberta Justice -Transcript Management the audio was listened to very carefully and there are no Opening Statements of Donald Broder as we suggest then I also realized that the Justice J. L. Lewis and Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Orders were also not included in the Alberta Court of Appeal Books.

Note: The Closing Statements Tab will provide;

  • Closing Arguments
  • Victim Impact Statement
  • Acknowledgements

Note: The Ongoing Issues Tab references from this point in the dateline.

  • Evidence of collusion within the Calgary Law Courts protecting the Edmonton Judges and Lawyers involved in this crime.
  • Evidence of Health Care Fraud committed by The Alberta Justice Department against an innocent senior citizen for whom is in a permanent care facility with Dementia.
  • Condolences to Mr. Jack Layton’s family with references to his final letter to Canadians.
  • Events planned to remember 9/11 and expose terrorism that is committed by The Alberta Justice Department against innocent Citizen.

2008 – December – Statement of Claim was issued and served on Guy Lacourciere, Bryan Kickham, Joseph Kueber, Elizabeth MacInnis, and Robert Sawers. 2010 – Through these litigation’s we have obtained answers that have exposed the Crown, Justices and Lawyers for conspiracy, collusion, fraud, and purgery. 2011 – The Calgary Law Courts have dismissed the Statement of Claims against all the Lawyers and Phylis Smith of Emery Jamieson for whom defended Elizabeth MacInnis has garnisheed Donald Broder’s wife Joyce Broder’s bank account for Court Costs unrelated to her of what money she had left in her savings account that was set aside to pay for the Good Samaritans Permanent Care Facility as she had been diagnosed with Dementia in 2008. 2011 – Master Prowse at Calgary Law Courts tells Donald Broder and George Broder that you cannot sue the Lawyer, “Elizabeth MacInnis” who won, then provides instruction that we could write the trial Judge and request the decision to be reversed and then dismissed the action with cost against Donald Broder and George Broder. 2011 – Donald Broder writes the trial Judge Justice Bielby and copies her with Master Prowse transcripts only to receive a letter from Edmonton Law Courts Master Prowse erred, and that Justice are not allowed to communicate directly with litigants. 2011 – At the Appeal of Master Prowses decision before Justice Karen Horner it was argued that Prowse had erred in providing instruction to write the trial Judge to have the decision reversed and that any Lawyer can be held accountable when they the only reason Elizabeth MacInnis had won was because she had committed Fraud, Obstruction of Justice, and Purgery. 2011 – Justice Karen Horner specifically said her colleague would not have said to write the trial Judge Justice Bielby to have the decision reversed, the Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Order was to old to enforce, and refused to address the purgery committed by Elizabeth MacInnis during the closing arguments of the trial, dismissed the Appeal and order costs against Donald Broder again. The Calgary Law Courts then banned Donald Broder from initiating any further legal action against these Lawyers and has refused to provide transcripts of the Court audio with Justice Karen Horner and Justice Hawko. 2011 – The Justices at Calgary Law Courts banned Donald Broder from initiating any further legal action without leave of the Court as of against Lawyers because his action have been dismissed because they are frivolous, vexatious, and abuse of process as per Alberta Rules of Court Rule 129. Needless to say seems like Donald Broder and Craig Broder had a 129 Application in March 0f 2001 claiming the action against them was frivolous, vexatious, and abuse of process and all the Justices allowed that action to continue, providing legal advice to Lawyers, deleting audio from the trial tapes, Amending the Statement of Defences 10 day before the trial, backdating the FIAT, forging the Judges second signature, circumventing the Rules of Court to substitute a new Plaintiff after the Pleadings were Ordered closed, breaching Court Orders, imposing substantial fines, using intimidation by falsely imprisoning an innocent man, suggesting that his children could take his place in Jail, and now putting Garnishees on his families bank accounts.

The Alberta Justice Department, Lawyers, and ALIA should have figured it out by now that they have gotten away with intimidation as of against others far too often, but now the Broder’s have are are willing at their expense to expose all the willful actions of all involved to make sure that Canadian Citizens can stand side by side to hold their Provincial and Federal Government’s accountable to the people that our rights and freedoms are upheld as per the Canadian Constitution.

   “We will not fall for fear mongering”

2011 – 9/11 – Commemorates 10 years since the Terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centres, and as such should also commemorate an end to the Progressive Conservative Government of Alberta for whose actions of wilful blindness has allowed terrorism to run rampant within the Alberta Law Courts.

2012 – April 11 – It is with great sadness the family of Donald H. (Don) Broder announces his passing at the hospital in Sundre, Alberta. September 23, 2011 – Joyce Broder is rushed to hospital from the long term care facility Good Samaritans in Stony Plain, Alberta where she passed away  Donald Broder her husband and his son Craig Broder were served by Emery Jamieson – Phylis Smith the lawyer representing Elizabeth MacInnis where by the Alberta Court action against her by Donald Broder and Craig Broder had been dismissed by Justice Karen Horner and under the civil enforcement act Phylis Smith of Emery Jamieson was demanding form 13 to be filed with the courts disclosing everything the Broder’s owned so they could garnish and or seize for court costs associated with the law suit brought against Elizabeth MacInnis. Phylis Smith of Emery Jamieson was asking the Courts to charge Donald Broder and Craig Broder with Contempt of Court if they did not provide form 13. December 2011 – Donald Broder completed the preparation with all necessary information to have the Broder Buck website designed to completion. April 1, 2012 – Donald Broder stopped taking his blood thinner medication necessary for life at his home in Sundre, Alberta. April 11, 2012 – Donald Broder passed away at Sundre Hospital from blood clots causing kidney failure. March 12 – 2013 – The Commission for complaints against the RCMP were informed as to the negligence of the commanding officer Sgt. Morton at Olds, Alberta detachment and an order was immediately initiated for an investigation which is still ongoing.

Cpl Clint Gulash was the investigator assigned to complete the investigation.

 

 On 2013-07-26 this correspondence arrives by mail from

G. Gingerysty S/Sgt. District Advisory NCO, Southern Alberta District.

The Crown prosecutor’s office still has not rendered a decision.

The Crown has been told by the Broder’s the right decision is for;

The Crown to criminally charge the Crown and

all Justices and lawyers involved.

As it stands!

2014 – An Appeal has been filed by The Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP in

Surrey, British Columbia and an

Order was issued for all information and documentation

The RCMP in Alberta have on this matter must be sent sent to Ottawa!

******************************************************************

Below the June 16, 2014 response from the

Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP in Ottawa.

Commision for complaints RCMP Ottawa letter

The Law Society of Alberta has

Guy Lacourciere of Lacourciere and Associates

listed on there website for an upcoming hearing.

Law society guy hearing dates

Good old – Guy Lacourciere

Kind of wonder how many clients he has played.

Or maybe it was the Broder’s that have the final play in this game,

Now it’s time to let all of these perpetrators feel the wrath.

*******************************************************************************

The story will be told someday. 

There were two prey an old wise one and a young smart one;

As the legal predators kept getting more vicious the two prey decided to split up;

These white collar predators got more vicious and gave chase to the old prey;

Believing the young prey was gone and would never return;

As the predators closed in on the old prey what they were not expecting;

was the young prey that they thought was gone; 

had now become;

The Predator.

*********************************************************

Alison Redford – Justice Minister / Attorney General

Congratulation to your term as Premier while you were Attorney General / Justice Minister your department framed the Broder families elderly parents Donald and Joyce Broder and you do not have what it takes to make it right, pathetic is to simple of a description for what you and your government stand for.

This depicts what values you have to offer every time your mouth opens!

 

This picture is in memory of our parents;

  victims of the corrupt;

Alberta Justice Department.

In Memory of

Donald H.  and Joyce M. Broder

  Attention: To the reader,

Please email you’re MLA and you’re MP

And state you’re mind to what punishment should be imposed against

JUSTICES OF THE COURT and lawyers within;

The Canadian Justice System for whom wilfully conspire

to defraud the innocent and vulnerable citizens of Canada.

Robert Nicholson – Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada webadmin@justice.gc.ca

Alison Redford – Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Alberta (past) info@alisonredford.ca

Verlyn Olson – Minister of Justice and Attorney General (current) wetaskiwin.camrose@assembly.ab.ca

Dave Hancock – Minister of Justice and Attorney General (past) edmonton.whitemud@assembly.ab.ca

Maybe try this e mail for Alberta’s new Premier;

Jim Prentice

jimmytheman@yahoo.com

jim prentice pictures – Google Search

Well, look at that Danielle Smith fell for fear mongering

she walk across the floor and

join the PC party.

Let her know what you think at

 dsmiththetraitor@yahoo.com

Don’t bother she’s not worth it

Government – their all the same good ole boys and girls club of Alberta.

Announcement

9 Wildrose members, including leader, joining Alberta PCs

CTV Calgary: A shift in power in the legislature
CTV Calgary: A shift in power in the legislature

Alberta’s political landscape looks dramatically different on Thursday after nine Wildrose MLAs crossed the floor. Chris Epp reports.
CTV Edmonton: Fallout after political shakeup

The decision by the Tory government to roll out the welcome mat to former Wildrose Leader Danielle Smith.
Canada AM: Wildrose Party decimated

Drew Barnes, an Alberta Wildrose MLA who did not cross the floor to the PCs discusses where the party goes from here and his disappointment.

Dean Bennett, The Canadian Press
Published Wednesday, December 17, 2014 12:18PM EST
Last Updated Wednesday, December 17, 2014 9:38PM EST
EDMONTON — The leader of Alberta’s Official Opposition shattered her caucus Wednesday by leading an en masse floor crossing, saying she no longer had the fire in the belly to oppose Premier Jim Prentice.

“If you’re going to be the official Opposition leader, you have to really want to take down the government and really want to take down the premier,” Danielle Smith, standing beside Prentice, told reporters at a news conference at Government House.

“I don’t want to take down this premier.
Related Stories

At least 7 Wildrose members, including Danielle Smith, to join Alberta PCs: sources

Photos

Jim Prentice, Danielle Smith make announcement
Alberta Premier Jim Prentice and former Wildrose Leader Danielle Smith speak to media after a caucus meeting in Edmonton Alta., Wednesday, December 17, 2014. (Jason Franson / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

“I want this premier to succeed, and I want to be part and parcel of helping him succeed.”

Earlier Wednesday, Smith and eight of her Wildrose party colleagues were accepted into Prentice’s Progressive Conservative caucus, leaving behind a five-member rump while elevating the Tory majority to an overwhelming 72 seats in the 87-seat legislature.

NDP and Liberal leaders accused Smith of an unprecedented betrayal of Wildrose supporters and voters along with those Albertans who rely on a strong opposition to keep a government in check.

But Smith said there was no longer any need to oppose a premier who, unlike his predecessors, agreed with what the Wildrose believed on issues such as land rights and fiscal conservatism.

“We won,” said Smith.

“We clearly managed to move away from two administrations that were not moving Alberta forward, that were not serving Albertans well, and we have a premier that shares the same conservative values that we do.”

Smith said she has asked the party and caucus to consider folding up shop to join the PCs in a provincial unification of the centre-right.

“I’m asking Wildrose members to come with us,” she said.

The Wildrose executive has already denounced the floor-crossings and in an email said it plans to fight on to contest the next election, slated for 2016.

“We have begun the process to select the next leader of our party and the next premier of Alberta,” said the email. “We remain fully committed to Albertans and to our membership.”

Smith said there had been informal talks between intermediaries for months on joining forces with Prentice, adding that interest in a union accelerated in recent weeks.

Prentice said the decision by his caucus to accept the Wildrosers was not unanimous but said “the support was overwhelming.”

He said it was a good day for those working to make Alberta better, and said there are no immediate plans to shake up his cabinet to make room for Smith or her MLAs.

Prentice saluted Smith.

“Danielle, you’ve shown considerable personal courage and determination in making this decision,” he said. “This is the same courage and determination that has served you and your team so well during your five years as leader of Wildrose.”

Joining Smith in the defection was her key lieutenant, government house leader Rob Anderson.

Anderson was elected as a Tory in 2008 but crossed the floor to the Wildrose in 2010. He was elected as a Wildroser in 2012 before crossing back to the Tories on Wednesday.

In an open letter, Anderson said it was better to now work inside the tent than engage in histrionic attacks from the outside.

“Why do we elect MLAs? To put on a partisan jersey and fight partisan battles for some kind of entertainment? I sure don’t think so,” wrote Anderson.

The other seven joining the PCs are: Gary Bikman, Jeff Wilson, Blake Pedersen, Bruce McAllister, Jason Hale, Rod Fox and Bruce Rowe.

They join former caucus mates Ian Donovan and Kerry Towle, who quit the Wildrose last month, saying they were impressed with Prentice and his team.

The opposition now consists of five leaderless Wildrosers, five Liberals, four NDPers and Independent Joe Anglin.

Anglin quit the Wildrose in November.

Liberal Leader Raj Sherman said he will ask the Speaker to install the Liberals as the new official opposition.

“The PCs and the Wildrose are one and the same,” said Sherman.

“The Liberals are the only sensible, centrist alternative right now in Alberta.”

NDP Leader Rachel Notley labelled the floor-crossings a “betrayal” of Albertans by a premier whose party was elected on a progressive platform in 2012 but who she said is now cynically tacking hard right to vacuum up its main political opponent.

“Jim Prentice may think, ‘Oh look at me, look at how Machiavellian and clever I am,”‘ said Notley. “But I think that it will really offend the basic values of many Albertans.”

The move brings into doubt the future of what had been considered the most effective official Opposition in Alberta in years.

The Wildrose was borne out of disgruntled Tories who quit the party as it moved left toward bigger budgets and budget deficits under former premier Ed Stelmach.

The polls had Smith and the Wildrose leading at one point in the last election campaign only to see its credibility unravel in the closing days by racist and homophobic statements from two of its candidates.

The Wildrose has since helped to expose spending and entitlement scandals that led to the resignation in March of then-premier Alison Redford.

In September, Prentice replaced Redford and on Oct. 27 the Tories defeated the Wildrose in four byelections, renewing concerns about the Wildrose prospects to form government while raising questions about Smith’s leadership.

 To all the elected Alberta MLA’s, Ministers and the current Chief Justice:

Demonstrations are to be planned at random Alberta Law Court Building’s throughout Alberta every year to remind the Provincial Government / Minister of Justice, and all MLA’s that every Canadian has a Constitutional Right to a Justice System that upholds the Laws of Canada. The Government of Alberta will be held accountable until assurance is provided to Canadians that there are severe consequences under the Criminal Code for Judges that willfully act in collusion with Lawyers to frame innocent people.

I,  Donald H. Broder  prepaid for the ongoing development of the Buck For Justice website to be maintained until such time as the Government of Canada issues a formal apology to all my  family, pays restitution and make a public commitment that the necessary steps will be taken to criminally charge all the perpetrators and send a message that in the future this kind of fraud will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

Or if the Government of Canada chooses to do nothing then precedence has been set that Court orders do not have to be followed, perjury, backdating and forging judges signatures has no consequences. And also deleting audio from the trial tapes can be accomplished depending on who you are and who you know.

 

Yours truly,

Donald H. Broder

Born in Fairview, Alberta – 

October 11, 1929 –  Deceased – April 11, 2012                          

© 2011-2012 Broder Buck All Rights Reserved  

14 comments

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Contact us: info@broderbuck.com
Copyright © 2016 - 2017 Broder Buck. All Rights Reserved. Created by Blog Copyright.

Copyright © 2016 - 2017 Broder Buck. All Rights Reserved. Created by Blog Copyright.