In 2015, The NDP Government of Alberta – Premier Rachel Notley and Justice Minister Kathleen Gangley were made aware that a Court Order issued in 2004 by Justice Myra Bielby had Ordered, Attorney General, Alison Redford and Justice Minister at the time to investigate Donald Broder and Craig Broder had never been initiated. So Donald Broder and Craig Broder investigated themselves and provided Kathleen Gangley, current Alberta Attorney General with the evidence to prove beyond any reasonable doubt they were not the criminals but instead The P.C. Government specifically; The Alberta Justice Department,”Alison Redford” and Federal Justice Department, “Justices of the Court” and Alberta lawyers to intimidate, frame and defraud the innocent Broder family, by falsely incarcerating 75 year old Donald Broder until he succumbed to their demands.

In 2015, The NDP Government of Alberta – Premier Rachel Notley and Justice Minister Kathleen Gangley were made aware that a Court Order issued in 2004 by Justice Myra Bielby had Ordered, Attorney General, Alison Redford and Justice Minister at the time to investigate Donald Broder and Craig Broder had never been initiated. So Donald Broder and Craig Broder investigated themselves and provided Kathleen Gangley, current Alberta Attorney General with the evidence to prove beyond any reasonable doubt they were not the criminals but instead The P.C. Government specifically; The Alberta Justice Department,”Alison Redford” and Federal Justice Department, “Justices of the Court” and Alberta lawyers to intimidate, frame and defraud the innocent Broder family, by falsely incarcerating 75 year old Donald Broder until he succumbed to their demands.

The BRODERBUCK

website is dedicated to;

Canada’s most vulnerable for whom

are not protected under the

Canadian Constitution.

Because they can be victimized and terrorized by

Justices of the Court and Lawyers for whom

if given the opportunity will conspire against their own client

and be defrauded of their life savings, framed and

falsely incarcerated until they are broke and

GO AWAY.

No-one in government cares!

Not even:

Rachel Notley

Premier of Alberta, Canada

SOON TO BE PAST PREMIER ALSO!

rachel-notleyNDP – Elected by default in 2015

Un-Represent’s

Alberta’s most vulnerable.

That’s OK

because Alberta’s most vulnerable have;

Kathleen Gangley

Un-Justice Minister = Useless Attorney General

ph-mla0846

for whom

has been presented the evidence

published on the;

BRODERBUCK

website.

She, yes, Ms. Gangley

has been made aware of the

corruption of the past

Federal and Provincial

P. C. Government’s

Specifically

Alison Redford

Past Un-Justice Minister = Useless Attorney General

and

Past Premier of Alberta.

************************

Welcome  To:

BRODERBUCK

and

THE BUCK FOR JUSTICE

WEBSITE:

Kingsfrontcover

************************************

Alison Redford

imagesweathered and war beatin! 

Will be charged sooner or later with

Obstruction of Justice

for participating in and concealing collusion and conspiracy within;

 The Alberta Judicial System to 

defraud, frame and falsely incarcerate an innocent 75 year old senior citizen.

Also charged with Contempt of Court for her failure to investigate as

“Ordered by the Courts”

within Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949.

While holding the position within

 The Alberta Government as;

 The Attorney General / Justice Minister of Alberta, Canada.

And now The New Premier of Alberta Rachel Notley and

The New Justice Minister of Alberta Kathleen Gangley

have been made aware that;

Alison Redford was informed of the criminal involvement of all the lawyers

criminal conduct inclusive of;  

A)  Backdating the FIAT on the Amended Statement of Defence and forging a Judges second signature.

B) Deletion of Donald H. Broders opening Statements from the trial audio.

C) Collusion between all lawyers involved and Alberta Justice to orchestrate the outcome of

Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action 9703-12949, The Alberta Court of Appeal and

The Supreme Court of Canada.

D) That a Court Order granted by Justice Lewis and extended  by Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich for which

The Plaintiff’s Lawyer; Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had made a formal application and was granted that

The Pleadings closed within the said Action 9703-12949 on March 15, 2001

then she ignored and failed to follow what she requested in the order and should be charged with contempt of court. 

E) The Plaintiff’s Lawyer; Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore realized she had ambushed herself and to follow

The Court Order she requested to close the Pleading, would lose the lawsuit

so instead called upon her daddy past

Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore

to call upon his friends to advance probate quickly and appoint

Personal Representatives then call on

Justice C. P Clarke 

to substitute

The Personal Representatives

as Plaintiffs

within the action after the

two year limitation period lapsed that governs

the deadline to substitute a new party to an action.

Alison Redford  

has finally done right by resigning from the position of;

Premier of Alberta and MLA

 as she should.

******************************************************************************************************

– Because of –

Alison Redford’s

willful blindness and continued refusal to follow the

April 29, 2004 – Court Order of Justice Myra Bielby to investigate

Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action No: 9703-12949.

An innocent 75 year old senior citizen

Donald H. Broder

was framed by

The Crown

acting in collusion

with his own lawyers then

had his bank accounts garnished and

his wife’s bank account garnished while she was 

in a Good Samaritans Home suffering with

Alzheimer’s and Dementia

THEN

an intimidating  forced entry by

Sheriff

George Butler

for whom was under Court Order to Seize

The Broder Buck by

whatever means necessary

at his private home.

Alison Redford;

Yes

Donald H. Broder and Joyce M Broder  were victims of

Government Fraud, Alberta Law Society Fraud and Judicial Fraud.

This page will substantiate proof by guiding you the reader through

Court filed documents, transcripts and correspondences from lawyers

to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that;

Alberta Justice Department and

Federally appointed Justices

lead the conspiracy

by acting in collusion with lawyers

to frame these innocent, vulnerable senior citizens. memories6

 It is the Broder families position that if

Alison Redford

allowed one senior citizen in Alberta to be framed by

 The Alberta Justice Department

That is one too many!

*************************************************************

ANNOUNCEMENT

**************************************************************

Alison Redford finally resigned on the 19h day of March, 2014.

Alberta Premier Alison Redford announces her resignation in

Edmonton, Alberta on Wednesday March 19, 2014.

Premier Alison Redford announces her resignation in the main rotunda of the Alberta Legislature in Edmonton , March 19, 2014.

As reported by The Edmonton Journal

Alberta Premier Alison Redford announces her resignation in

Edmonton, Alberta on Wednesday March 19, 2014.

**********************************************************************

AND NOW IT WAS REPORTED BY;

RICK BELL on April 25, 2014

That;

Past Premier Alison Redford had retreated back to her MLA job  for Calgary Chinook; 

and now just over one month since her resignation it was reported that she is

” MIA” – Missing In Action!

RedfordMIA

*******************************************************************************

Willful Criminal Negligence by;

The Alberta Justice Department – led by

Alison Redford – Attorney General / Justice Minister 

 was the direct cause of the wrongful imprisonment of an

innocent 75 year old Canadian Senior Citizen

Donald H. Broder.

and had the investigation been done in a timely manner

Alison Redford – Attorney General / Justice Minister

could have prevented 

The Justice Department from conspiring with Justices and lawyers

in the criminal act of conspiracy to defraud 

Donald Broder and Craig Broder 

of all costs associated with an orchestrated outcome of the trial

within Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action no: 9703-12949

for which resulted in a substantial loss to 

Donald H.  Broder’s  family of ;  

The World Record Broder Buck

***********************************

Then

Justice Myra Bielby pronounced by way of

Court Order to established 

 an auction house in Court Room 414 of

The Edmonton, Alberta Law Courts

 and sold the judicially extorted personal property . 

The World Record Broder Buck;

to a U. S. Citizen, Don Shaufler of

Ennis Montana for $325,000 cdn.

**********************************************************************

Then committing  fraud again as orchestrated by the same Justices of the court ordering

  garnishees against

Donald H. Broder,

his wife Joyce M. Broder,

his son and

grandchild’s bank accounts.

edmemories18

But now we understand why!

The Government of Alberta

letter below in paragraph 2 states;

the Government of Alberta cannot interfere with or comment on matters

before the court or judicially decided by the court.” 

Because the Federal Government appointed Justices and

Alberta Justice Department interfere with the matter by

acting in collusion to orchestrate the outcome with

lawyers while the matter is before the court.

 Redford1

Redford2

As stated within the April 29, 2004, paragraph 2 of

The Court Order “Below”;

Justice Myra Bielby orders that;

 “The Defendant, Don Broder is to be remanded into custody …”

“it’s incomprehensible that The Provincial and Federal Governments of Canada treat the innocent elderly like a prisoner”

We understood that the Government of Canada had Donald H. Broder incarcerated so they could take good care of him because;

“The Alberta Justice Department would only incarcerate an innocent 75 year old senior citizen Donald H. Broder

because The Governments of Canada treat prisoners better than the elderly”

(In paragraph 1 and 2 of the  April 29, 2004 Court Order below) – Justice Myra Bielby;

“Holds Donald H. Broder in civil contempt then remands him back into custody”

Donald H. Broder became a prisoner again, Justice Myra Bielby saw him in a wheelchair during the Court appearance on April 29, 2004

and realized that he needed someone to push his wheelchair to ensure he attends court.

 That must be why Justice Myra Bieby remanded Donald H. Broder back into custody so

that one of Edmonton’s finest from the Edmonton Police Services

could push his wheelchair to and from court.

(In paragraph 4 of the April 29, 2004 Court order below) – Justice Myra Bielby also Ordered that;

“Donald Broder and Craig Broder be investigated by;”

The Attorney General!”

***************************************************************************************************************

Wasn’t that you Alison Redford on April 29, 2004?

Now that you Alison Redford are Premier of Alberta 

So when you  have to write a resume’ you know;

To find a new job!

Let it be known that it was The Broder family 

that reminded you that it was you who was; 

 The Attorney General / Justice Minister of Alberta, Canada on April 29, 2004!

Have you’re new employer call the Broder family for a reference.

orderchargesand moneytobloos1

orderchargesandmoneytobloos2

orderchargesandmoneytobloos3

Alison Redford / Attorney General

Craig Broder wrote to you on numerous occasions to inquire about an investigation into Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action No: 9703-12949 and you were not even aware that the investigation was Ordered by Justice Myra Bielby on April 29, 2004 at The Edmonton Law Courts;

Anyway; you’re response was consistent;

Redfordsletter

Alison Redford/ Attorney General

seeing how you told us that;

“neither you nor the Department of Justice can interfere with matters judicially decided by the courts

I hope you don’t mind that we the accused

Donald Broder and Craig Broder

took matters into our own hands and performed our own investigation into

possible criminal charges that could be laid against;

 “The Crown”

“Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta”

  and also specific;

Justices of the court and the lawyers involved;

“for perjury, obstruction of justice or any other appropriate charges.”

“Don’t worry if you; Alison Redford cannot interfere with matters judicially decided by the courts”

 We the accused;

Donald Broder and Craig Broder.

 Will interfere if our own investigation

warrants a reason to do so.

Alison Redford – Attorney General / Justice Minister of Alberta

You must have also had the Justice Department investigate,

Or did you?

Were not sure!

Hold on; lets see;

The Order to Investigate;

It really did  not mean to Investigate.

Because they; The Crown;

Were aware Fraud was being committed by

Alberta Justices 

Oh, got it;

It’s  was a scare tactic to intimidate

The Innocent Broder Family! 

***************************************

OK;

Alison Redford is gone

so wouldn’t you think it’s

The new Justice Minister

Kathleen Gangley’s

responsibility to;

Confirm the results of 

The Investigation?

It’s understandable,

Alison Redford

must have been  focused on

furthering your career  and

not wasting  her valuable time 

performing an investigation

that was;

Ordered by the Courts.

“The Alberta Justice Department / Justice Myra Bielby

incarcerated Donald Broder at 75 years of age in a wheelchair on April 23, 2004.

An innocent senior citizen and made him a prisoner in

The Edmonton Remand Center for 11 days

sometimes in isolation and without necessary medical attention

then with involvement from his own family finally being fed cold pancakes and potatoes

until he followed the

Justice Myra Bielby’s Court Order,

So we the Canadian people expect that you;

Alison Redford

will first step down from being

Premier of Alberta;

” She resigned March 19, 2014!”

Write a formal apology to;

Donald H. Broder’s and family.

“we are sill waiting!”

 Refund all their damages.

“we are still waiting!”

and

pledge to all Canadian’s for whom will all eventually be vulnerable

 SENIOR CITIZENS 

 That the Canadian Governments will ensure all Canadians are protected by 

The Canadian Constitution

and that

The Government of Alberta will ensure that;

 All Senior Citizens of Alberta, Canada

will be allowed to live retirement in peace.

Safe guards legislated  that protection will be provided to protect their net worth

and at the end of their life;

 allowed to die with dignity!

 THEN;

Alison Redford

voluntarily incarcerate yourself  for 11 days in the Edmonton Remand Centre

which should be sufficient time for you to purge you’re contempt of court and follow the;

COURT ORDER

that was issued on April 29, 2004 by the trial Judge;

Justice Myra Bielby!

for you to investigate and get judicially involved

************************************

At the same time you should criminally charge;

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

with civil contempt for not following the

Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich

Court Order. “below”

That disappeared from the Court file at the Edmonton Law Court!

Glad you asked, how do we know that?

Here is the answer you have all been waiting for!

Donald Broder and Craig Broder attended the Clerk of the Courts office for the first time on the 14 day of November, 2008 by scheduled appointment to review the Court file.

It was at that time the Clerk of the Court provided Donald Broder and Craig Broder with a copy of the;

PROCEDURAL RECORD PRINT – ” below is page 6, dated 14/11/2008 at 15:07:07 “

showing – Order   FILE  CERT. Of  RE – A.H. WACHOWICH – Date filed 05 MARCH 2001 – WB “Weir Bowen”

Procrecordprintachowichorder

 

********************************************************

“Below” The Copy of The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Court Order

provided to Donald Broder and Craig Broder on 14/11/2008 by

The Clerks of The Courts office at The Edmonton Law Courts

of a Certified Copy of The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Order.

wachowichcertifiedid

  Immediately above and to the left of Donald Broder and Craig Broder is the certification. “above”

An enlarged copy of the certification – “below

Proves it was hereby certified  to be a true copy of the original order

Dated this 5th day of March 2001

certifiedcopywachowichorder

Donald Broder and Craig Broder were at The Clerks office on November 14, 2008 as per the procedural record print date

and if they had requested a certified copy of the true filed order it would have been certified for November 14, 2008.

The true filed copy of The Chief Justice A. H.  Wachowich Court order was missing from the Court file and

someone put back in the court file a certified copy of the original court order for us to find.

Alison Redford;

Bet you never thought the Clerks office would somehow provided us with a certified copy of the true filed Original Court Order of;

Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich

“obviously there are others that want The Alberta Justice Department’s corruption exposed”

*******************************************

Take note below – Feb – 14 – 2001 Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen faxed the certified copy to someone.

“Did we mention that Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore was the daughter of Past Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore for whom

had just been replaced by Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich in December 0f 2000.” 

Wachowichorder2

Paragraph 3 above the Plaintiff’s lawyer Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen  was ordered to file;

The Certificate of Readiness on or before March 15, 2001.

Well now look below Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen confirmed she filed;

The Certificate of Readiness on April 17, 2003.

So we the Canadian people expect that you;

Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen

will first step down and never practice law again;

write a formal apology to all Canadians especially our most vulnerable 

“Senior Citizens” –  then;

voluntarily incarcerate yourself  for 11 days

which should be sufficient time for you to purge you’re

contempt of court and follow the;

COURT ORDER

for you to file

The Certificate of Readiness 

on or before March 15, 2001 

as order by

The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich;

Alison Redford and Elizabeth MacInnis both need to be taught a lesson so on behalf of;

The SENIOR CITIZENS of Canada

for whom live within their means and know how costly the Government jails are,

 would encourage The Edmonton Police Chief

Rod Knecht

Rod Knecht speaks to reporters Friday at a news conference announcing him as Edmonton's new police chief.

to allow;

“Alison Redford and Elizabeth MacInnis to  share a prison cell until they purge their civil contempt.”

Ah, and now Alison Redford is too busy being the Premier of Alberta!

“She doesn’t care about any senior or any Albertan but herself”

Alison Redford Keystone Study

So the Broder family feels obligated to disclose that the;

image of investigator - investigation on a blue background with a magnifier - JPG

is now complete

and for the protection of all seniors we feel it’s of;

“National Importance”

to expose the results to;

  All the citizen’s of Canada and the world 

so that we as Canadian’s can hold;

The Alberta Justice Department, Justices and lawyers

and

The Supreme Court of Canada

accountable!

Kingsfrontcover

Maybe we should submit a bill for performing the investigation ourselves!

 Since Alison Redford – Attorney General / Justice Minister clearly stated;

“As such, neither I, nor the Department of Justice, can interfere in matters judicially decided by the courts.”

Redfordsletter

We could call it  Justice Department clean-up committee pay!

 At least we showed up.

O.K. enough

I know;

you all want to know our findings!

The results will be in brief form and will be in their own words taken from excerpts from;

Court Documents, Transcripts and Legal Correspondences.

In other words;

The Alberta Justice Department, Justices and Lawyers will;

Convict themselves!

Let’s see if they can conceal or delete these facts!

delete button on a computer keyboard

Let’s start with;

 The Cross- Examination of the Defendant’s Donald Broder and Craig Broder’s lawyer;

Guy Lacourciere of Lacourciere Associates.

Excerpt is Page 28 and 29 from the original transcript of the cross-examination of his affidavit;

 Q. – denotes a question asked by Craig Broder

  A. – denotes the answer provided under oath by Guy Lacourciere of Lacourciere Associates.

crossexampage28crossexampage29Donald H. Broder was under 

image of investigator - investigation on a blue background with a magnifier - JPG

to determine if it was him that tried to  ambush

The Plaintiff’s lawyer Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

and to the contrary we concluded that;

The Alberta Justice Department was upset that the Plaintiff’s lawyer;

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen had ambushed  herself’!

Excerpt from Weir Bowen’s website;

Why Choose Us?

Expertise: in law on how to blame, defraud and falsey incarcerate innocent seniors becaue she;

Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen

is known to ambush herself then blame it on innocent senior citizens.

Elizabeth M. MacInnis, Q.C. then was recognized by her peers and is now a Q.C.

“Queen’s Council” royalty in their own mind!

simply putting it a;

“Hero in her own mind”

Elizabeth M. MacInnis, Q.C.

Elizabeth M. MacInnis Q.C.                                                                  Direct Contact: (780) 424-2030 emacinnis@weirbowen.com

Liz completed articles of clerkship with a predecessor firm of Weir Bowen LLP (Newson Brumlik) in 1980. She is one of the founding partners of Weir Bowen. She has a general litigation practice, with an emphasis on matters involving insurance, personal injury, wrongful death, wills and estates, dependent adults, and commercial and real estate transactions.

She has extensive experience as counsel before the courts of Alberta (at trial and on appeal), and in negotiations, mediations and judicial dispute resolution of civil claims.

Liz has taught civil litigation at the Alberta Bar Admission Course and has made presentations and chaired a number of legal education seminars. Lawyers from other firms often refer cases to her.

Education:

1976 – Bachelor Arts (with distinction) – University of Alberta 1979 – Bachelor of Laws (with distinction) – University of Alberta

Bar Admission:

1980 – Law Society of Alberta

Professional Associations:

Edmonton Bar Association

                                                                                                                   Copyright © 2013 – Weir Bowen LLP. All Rights Reserved.     |     Phone: (780) 424-2030     |     Fax:  (780)  424-2323

The Revillon Building 500     |     10320 – 102 Avenue NW     |     Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4A1

SO IN RETURN


The Alberta Justice Department lead by

Past Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore ” yes Liz MacInnis / Moore = her daddy”

colluded with

Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore of Weir Bowen  

in ambushing an innocent 75 year old senior citizen;

Donald H. Broder.

Continuation excerpts from Guy Lacourcieres cross-examination.

Page 28 / Line 6 to 17 –

A  “As a matter of fact, it was told to the court of appeal. The comment was made by the court of appeal – – well, you ambushed Ms. MacInnis and we said, no, nobody was ambushed in respect to this. That matter was raised at the beginning in the statement of defence.”

  Q  “What do you mean by “ambushed Ms. MacInnis?”

A   “The court had asked the question.

Q   “If we ambushed Elizabeth MacInnis?”

A   It appears to us that Ms. MacInnis may have been ambushed by the motion, by Sawyers, in respect to – – in respect to the motion that had been filed in 2001.”

Page 29 / Line 10 to 13 – A

“Let’s be clear. You filed a statement of defence. In the statement of defence it raised the issue of standing, okay?

                  Later on a comment was made, first of all, by Ms. MacInnis, that she had been ambushed.”

The first part of the investigation shall start with;

“Ms. MacInnis may have been ambushed by the motion, by Sawyers, … in respect to the motion that had been filed in 2001.”

and

The second part of the investigation shall start with;

“The comment was made by the court of appeal – – well, you ambushed Ms. MacInnis”

But let it be known

“Later on a comment was made, first of all, by Ms. MacInnis, that she had been ambushed.”

Prelude to the first part of the investigation;

“in respect to the motion that had been filed in 2001.”

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen requests consent from Donald Broder and Craig Broder to accept and allow her to file;

The Amended Statement of Claim without Personal Representatives appointed by the surrogate courts obviously then not named as Plaintiff’s 

and

The Certificate of Readiness to close the pleadings.

If  Donald Broder or Craig Broder were trying to ambush Elizabeth MacInnis consent would not have been declined.

Donald Broder and Craig Broder instructed Robert Sawers to deny consent.

So Elizabeth MacInnis filed a pleading requesting a court order from Justice J. L. Jewis

to accept the Amended Statement of Claim and set a date to file the Certificate of Readiness to close the pleadings.

It was heard by Justice J. L. Lewis on the 18 day of December, 2000 and the Order was granted.

lewisorder1lewisorder2

THE

image of investigator - investigation on a blue background with a magnifier - JPG

concluded that

Donald H. Broder a 75 year old senior while being falsey incarcerated at

The Edmonton Remand Center

was defrauded by his own lawyer Guy Lacourciere

for ambushing Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen


While all along and

 as the evidence will prove it was

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen that ambushed herself!

Then conspired with Donald H. Broder’s lawyers 

to teach him a lesson by obtaining their own willful assistance to

collude and conspire to defraud Donald H. Broder for substantial legal fees and

then  garnish his bank account of over $225,000.00  

while working together to frame and falsely incarcerate this innocent senior citizen at

The Edmonton Remand Center.

from April 23  to May 5, 2004  

Donald Broder and Craig Broder had just won the law suit as;

  1. Elizabeth MacInnis just forced the Pleadings closed by way of Court order on herself before the Application for Probate to appoint Personal Representatives was applied for at The Surrogate Courts.

and

2. As of July 9, 1999 the two year limitation period  lapsed to add or substitute  new Plaintiff’s / The Personal Representatives  from the original Statement of Claim file date of July 8, 1997 as it was now December 18, 2000.

Donald Broder and Craig Broder had Robert Sawers make the Jury trial Application, we did not require a jury we had won but just prior to the Jury trial Application Robert Sawers filed a 129 Application, stating the action was frivolous, vexatious and abuse of court process as the Plaintiff’s lack standing in their personal capacity only

Personal Representatives

could sue on behalf of a deceased.

Case Law

proving that only;

 Personal Representatives

could bring an action on behalf of a deceased.

Case Law mugford vs. mugford (Full version)PDF

Case Law from; Newfoundland Supreme Court – Court of Appeal

Mugford vs. Mugford

Quote: Last page – last two paragraphs

    The conclusion to be drawn is that the respondent, having no interest in the land, has no standing to bring an action. Although it was, as described by the trial judge, a dispute between Gordon Mugford and Ernest Mugford, it was a dispute over nothing. While Ernest Mugford may or may not have acquired possessory title or a statutory defence, it is the role of the administrator and not the role of Gordon Mugford to put this to the test.

    The action was wrongly conceived for this reason, if for no other, and ought not to have proceeded, The appeal is allowed. The judgment of the trial judge is set aside. The appellant may have his costs both here and in the trial division.

GOODRIDGE C.J.N.  – I concur O’NEILL J.A. –  I concur CAMERON J.A.

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen was served with the Defendants 129 Application supported by the case-law Mugford vs. Mugfrod.

Page 28 and 29 of Guy Lacourciere cross-examination

“Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen “made the comment that she had been ambushed”

crossexampage28

crossexampage29

The Court Order below has never been followed to date, for which closed the pleadings on or before March 15, 2001.

Wachowichorder1Wachowichorder2

Now that Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen has lost the litigation the evidence will be provided  to prove how a

conspiracy to orchestrate the outcome and ambush the Defendant’s Donald Broder and Craig Broder

will be put into play by The Alberta Justice Department to

defraud, intimidate and falsely incarcerate these innocent Defendant’s

that did not know or try to ambush Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

and it will be made clear by the evidence provided that we, Donald Broder and Craig Broder

were punished because Elizabeth MacInnis had ambushed herself.

quinn1

quinn2

Master W. J. Quinn was under

image of investigator - investigation on a blue background with a magnifier - JPG

for ambushing an innocent 75 year old  senior citizen.

Donald H. Broder

On April 27, 2001 Master W. J. Quinn hears the comment made by Elizabeth MacInnis that she had been ambushed

so he takes the liberty to adjourn the 129 application to keep the pleadings opened and allowing

Elizabeth MacInnis time to apply for probate and appoint Personal Representatives.

Excess of the two year limitation period has lapsed from the Original Statement of Claim filed date of July 8, 1997 and the Original Statement of Defence date of July 28, 1997

If we take it from the latter the original Statement of Defence file date of July 28, 1997 to the Master W. J. Quinn hearing date of April 27, 2001  excess of 3 1/2 years has lapsed.

Below is an excerpt from the Statute of Limitations Act.

Limitationact2

Donald Broder and Craig Broder instruct Robert Sawers to appeal Master Quinns order and it is heard by

Justice C. P. Clarke

on September 18, 2001 now excess of 4 years from the Original Statement of Claim file date of July 8, 1997.

Justice C. P. Clarke

also hears the comment made by Elizabeth MacInnis that she had been ambushed and

was aware the pleadings closed immediately following Donald Broder and Craig Broder’s 129 Application

so he takes the liberty to ambush the Defendant’s by ordering that;

“The Plaintiff’s have leave to file an Amended Amended Statement of Claim to add The Personal Representatives as Plaintiff’s.”

CPclarkeorder1CPclarkeorder2

Justice C. P. Clarke is under 

image of investigator - investigation on a blue background with a magnifier - JPG

for adding new Plaintiff’s on September 18, 2001

excess of 4 years after the Original Statement of Claim was filed on July 8, 1997

breaching the 2 year Statute of  Limitation and acting biased and prejudiced by

ambushing an innocent 75 year old senior citizen.

Donald H. Broder

Rocklake vs. Timberjack (full version)PDF

Rocklake vs. Timberjack was heard by the Alberta Court of Appeal and supports the Statute of Limitation period of 2 years to add or substitute a new Plaintiff.

Below are the relevant excerpts and for those of you that would prefer to read the entire case law also available in PDF.

Rocklake vs. Timberjack (full version)PDF

timberjack01

timberjack02

timberjack03

timberjack04

“The investigation was not wasted time and the website does not require ink!”

 Hold on lets review the Justice Bielby Court Order !

Didn’t it say to turn transcripts over to the Attorney General!

“If you forgot Alison Redford that was you at the time!”

“with a request for an investigation for possible criminal charges that could be laid against

Don Broder and Craig Broder?”

Justice Myra Bielby was also under

image of investigator - investigation on a blue background with a magnifier - JPG

for ambushing an innocent 75 year old senior citizen.

Donald H. Broder

Can you imagine

 Justice Myra Bielby or is it because she is Honourable 

she thought Donald Broder and Craig Broder would be 

intimidate  by her using her authoritative position as a scare tactic!

orderchargesand moneytobloos1

 orderchargesandmoneytobloos2

“Now that we know Alison Redford said; she cannot become judicially involved in matters decided by the courts”

 Do you think;

 Anything was ever turned over to

The Attorney General – Alison Redford for an investigation?

She is only

The Chief Legal Advisor!

orderchargesandmoneytobloos3

Hold on again,

In paragraph 2 Justice Bielby’s order above it states;

2) The Defendant, Don Broder, is to be remanded in custody until he deposits the sale proceeds from the sale of the Trophy into the trust account of his Solicitors, Beresh Depoe Cunningham ……..

Oh, Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham was on retainer as Donald H. Broder’s criminal lawyer!

Then why did Guy Lacourciere get involved to obtain the money from Donald H. Broder wife Joyce Broder while

Donald H. Broder was in prison and then turned it over to

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen instead of Beresh Depoe Cunningham.

TDtransfertolaccer

Answer: To stop the matter from going criminal!

Conspiracy to defraud

 Guy Lacourciere  clarified in the cross-examination Elizabeth MacInnis comment that she had been ambushed,

so it is alleged Guy Lacourciere was assisting with ambushing his own client Donald H. Broder!

Note: Guy Lacourciere had quit on Donald Broder and Craig Broder  on October 30, 2003;

just 2.5 month prior to the  scheduled trial date of January 19 – 23, 2004!

Guy Lacourciere admits in the cross-examination that he assisted the  Broder’s by telephone during the trial!

You decide –  “Was Guy Lacourciere assisting Donald H. Broder or was he really assisting Elizabeth MacInnis?”

See excerpts of the transcripts of page 40, 41, 42 and 43 of

Guy Lacourcieres cross-examination below.

crossexamp40

crossexamp41

crossexamp42

crossexamp43

Prelude to the second part of the investigation;

Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson was retained as defence council for Donald H. Broder shortly after Guy Lacourciere quit in October of 2003.

The first thing Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson did was Amend The Statement of Defence on January 9, 2004;

“Hold on that was not the first thing Bryan Kickham did;

The first thing he did was take a $15,000.00 retainer from an innocent senior citizen to prepare for trial!

so the second thing Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson did was;

Amend Donald H. Broder’s Statement of Defence on January 9, 2004.”

As the investigators from the Attorney Generals office should have asked themselves;

1)              Why would Donald Broder’s own lawyer Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson apply for and be granted by The Court a;

FIAT on January 9, 2004

FIAT means – “permission to amend The Statement of Defence”

then prepare and file an Amended Statement of Defence to 

The Amended Amended Statement of Claim on January 9, 2004

just 10 days before the scheduled trial of January 19 – 23, 2004

then back date the FIAT to January 9, 2003?

So why wouldn’t the trial Judge Justice Bielby see that;

Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson Amended The Statement of Defence on January 9, 2004 just 10 days before the trial!

Because, this would prevent the trial Judge from seeing that the issue of lack of Personal Representatives had been raised within the

The Original Statement of Defence !

           Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson backdated the FIAT “permission to amend” to January 9, 2003

or as the evidence will prove  the backdate was added in after  the Judge signed then the same Judges second signature was forged ? 

See the Amended Statement of Defence below! 

amendedsodfiat

Close up of the FIAT – “permission to amend”

amended statement of defence 2

Below is page 0011 of The Procedure Record Print provided to Donald Broder and Craig Broder by The Clerk of The Court at The Edmonton Law Courts on the

14 day of the 11 month of 2008 for which confirms the FIAT was granted by the Courts on

January 9, 2004!

Not on January 9, 2003!

recordprintfiat

During  Donald H. Broder’s

image of investigator - investigation on a blue background with a magnifier - JPG

evidence was discovered that proves;

Donald H. Brodere’s own lawyer Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson conspire with

the Plaintiff’s lawyer Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen to

frame, orchestrate the false incarceration and ultimately defraud an innocent 75 year old senior citizen.

Donald H. Broder

******************

Page 43 – lines 25 and 26  of the cross-examination of Guy Lacourciere

Q – Why would you file it?

A – Why would you file it?

Page 42 – lines 26 and 27 of the cross-examination of Guy Lacourciere

Q – So the amended one takes precedence?

A – That’s correct.

Page 43 – line 1 and 2 of the cross-examination of Guy Lacourciere

Q – Total precedence

A- Absolutely.

Was there an issue that was raised within the Original Statement of Defence that

Donald H. Broder’s lawyer Bryan Kickham of Miller Thomson

was purposely concealing  from the trial Judge Justice Bielby

to assist Elizabeth MacInnis Weir Bowen from  ambushing herself?

Closing argument from the trial below!

Argumentsbymacinnis1

Argumentsbymacinnis2Argumentsbymacinnis3

Wait let’s ask Guy Lacourciere if the issue of lack of Personal Representatives was raised within

The Original Statement of Defence

and not in early 2001 as

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

told the trial Judge Justice Bielby during the closing arguments.

So Craig Broder asked Guy Lacourciere the question see excerpts from The Cross-Examination of Guy Lacourciere page 28 below.

crossexampage28

Now the

image of investigator - investigation on a blue background with a magnifier - JPG

leads us to the criminal activity by the Crown!

“wait a minute now that the evidence proves The Crown participated in a criminal activity.”

I wonder if it is possible to have Alison Redford / The Attorney General / Chief Legal Advisor provide advise as to

  who an innocent 75 year old senior citizen should call to have

The Crown lay criminal charges against The Crown!

“You gotta wonder who should Donald H. Broder have arrested!”

You mean to tell me that Guy Lacourciere showed The Alberta Court of Appeal Justices;

Carole Conrad, Ronald Berger and Peter Costigan

that Elizabeth MacInnis had committed perjury and they did nothing about it!

Hold on The Alberta Court of Appeal held up Justice Bielby’s decision and

dismissed Donald H. Broder’s contempt charge,

oh ya they also reduced his fine.

But refused to overturn the trial Judges decision

But wait a minute,

above on page 28 of the cross-examination of Guy Lacourciere

line 7 and 8

“The comment was made by the court of appeal _ _ well you ambushed Ms. MacInnis”

appealbookdigestcover

appealbook3sod

appealbookopeningstatements missingappealbookargumentsmacinnis

This seems like a job the FBI should be involved in after all The Alberta Justice Department and the lawyer’s involved participated in the conspiracy to defraud an innocent 75 year old senior citizen Donald H. Broder then held an auction at The Edmonton Law Courts and sold the extorted World Record Broder Buck for their own personal gain to an American citizen Don Shaufler in Montana for $225,000.00 US which converted to over $325,000.00 Cdn. all because Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore the daughter of Past Chief Justice of Alberta – W. Kenneth Moore made the comment she had been ambushed.

Donald H. Broder was under

image of investigator - investigation on a blue background with a magnifier - JPG

for why the Application for Leave to

The Supreme Court of Canada was dismissed

as the evidence provided it was

Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham

that heard the comment about being ambushed made by;

Elizabeth MacInnis of Weir Bowen

so in return they conspired to

Orchestrate the Application for Leave to

The Supreme Court of Canada

and were successful in colluding to obtain the results of a

Dismissal.

So that lead to!

Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham being under

image of investigator - investigation on a blue background with a magnifier - JPG

for allowing a senior citizen to be framed as he was

Donald H. Broder’s criminal lawyer retained to defend him while incarcerated on the orchestrated

false contempt of Court charge.

Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham is also under investigation for being retained by

Donald H. Broder to file the application for leave to

The Supreme Court of Canada

but also heard the comment by

Elizabeth MacInnis that she had been ambushed so the evidence below will prove that;

Marvin Bloos orchestrated the Application for Leave to The Supreme Court of Canada

to cover up the criminal activity of all the Justices and lawyers involved

including himself.

Supremecourt1

Supremecourt3

” For all the documents we have discovered and disclosed from our investigation”

The above Table of Contents from The Application for Leave to The Supreme Court of Canada has

provided the evidence to prove that criminal charges should be laid immediately against

Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham!

All  that Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham included on behalf of his client;

Donald H. Broder in;

The Application for leave to;

The Supreme Court of Canada was;”

“The Original Statement of Defence!”

Supremecourt4

Review the full version purchased in PDF directly from

The Clerk of the Court at The Supreme Court of Canada

as it will provide the evidence to convict

Marvin Bloos of Beresh Depoe Cunningham for;

Conspiracy to Defraud

his own client an innocent 75 year old senior citizen

Donald H. Broder

Leave to the Supreme Court of Canada (full version)PDF

Lets see what Calgary Law Courts said about a lawsuit against Marvin Bloos.

http://www.broderbuck.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/bloos2.jpg

It Gets More Interesting Keep Reading!

kingstbe or not to be

David Letterman should use this one!

CBS – Late Night Top 10 Things to have on you’re bucket list if are a Defendant to a lawsuit in Alberta, Canada.

10) When a lawsuit is initiated against you and you know you are innocent, immediately sell everything you own and use the money to pay for a law degree for someone you trust like one of your children, grandchildren or yourself as they should graduate within plenty of time to represent you at the trial.

9) If you are a senior citizen you should immediately withdraw all your money from your savings account, inform all your pension providers to stop all automatic deposits and as soon as you receive your pension checks by mail or better yet have them picked up and cashed at Money Mart into coins then place all your coins in weather proof storage container and bury it in a secret location so there is no trace of you’re savings that can be garnished then there is a high probability the lawsuit would be discontinued as soon as you ask you’re lawyer to take an IOU.

8)  The Alberta Justice Department allows a false Affidavit of Service for Application for Probate to Appoint Personal Representatives that was sworn by the legal secretary of the Plaintiff’s lawyers that was based on a note to file the Defendant’s lawyer had confirmed he had received a copy for information purposes is contradicted by an Affidavit from the Defendant’s lawyer that he did not accept service on behalf of the Defendant because the pleadings were closed within the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench action for which he was on retainer as defence counsel.

7) When you are scheduled for court bring extra batteries as  the RCMP told us that the batteries might of died in the microphone causing the audio recording device to be selective on what was recorded during the trial at The Edmonton Law Courts;  deliberately missing the opening statements read on behalf of the Defendant, Donald Broder during the opening ceremony of the orchestrated trial on January 19, 2004.

6) The Statute of Limitations of 2 years to add or substitute new Plaintiff’s to a Statement of Claim does not apply to the Plaintiff’s lawyer because her father The Chief Justice of Alberta heard his daughter comment about being ambushed by the Defendant’s lawyer so The Alberta Justice Department thought it only appropriate to ambush the innocent 75 year old senior citizen that did not even know or try to ambushed anyone.

5) When you have been served with a Statement of Claim make sure as a Defendant you research the family tree of the Plaintiff’s lawyer and if her father is the Chief Justice of Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench tell your lawyer not to let her ambush herself.

4) When the Defendant’s lawyer quits 3 months before the trial it’s because you do not need a lawyer to win as long as the Original Statement of Defence that raised the issue of standing / lack of Personal Representatives and The Statement of Defence to The Amended Amended Statement of Claim the plead estoppel is not Amended to conceal the Original Statement of Defence from the trial Judge for which would orchestrate the outcome in favor of the Plaintiff’s lawyer and if you still lose you will have nobody to blame but yourself because as the Alberta Law Courts have stated you can’t sue the lawyer that won even if she committed fraud to win, but you can write the trial judge to have the decision reversed then she will have lost so now you can sue her.

3) When your lawyer quits 3 months before the trial and you retain another lawyer for whom accepts a fifteen thousand dollar retainer to prepare for trial waits for the check to clear then makes an application before the Edmonton Law Courts for a FIAT on January 9, 2004, “permission to amend your Statement of Defence” backdates the FIAT to January 9 2003 then when your new lawyer calls to tell you that you are going to lose and he is told you do not need him to lose and fire him immediately you hear panic in his voice as if he got caught with his hands in the cookie jar. Then a few days later you receive a phone call from someone pretending to be a lawyer from the Fifth Estate asking lots of questions you should be aware the lawyers involved are in panic mode trying to figure out if you know what they are up to.

2) Always presume you are guilty until proven innocent because the Alberta Justice Department will orchestrate your guilty verdict even if they know you are innocent.

1) As an innocent senior citizens prepare yourself by reading Company’s Coming cook books for ideas on how to make survival soup from a ketchup package and cold water which will be enough because your not expecting company for dinner while incarcerated in isolation at The Edmonton Remand Center for not following a 2004 court order, while the Attorney General of Alberta, Alison Redford takes years to initiate the investigation ordered by the courts that will prove you were innocent and that it was the Plaintiff’s lawyer that did not follow an earlier 2001 court order granted by the new Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich for whom replaced the Plaintiff’s lawyers father past chief Justice of Alberta W. Kenneth Moore.

April232004contempt1

April232004contemthearing2

April232004contemthearing3

April232004contemthearing4

Bielbyjuly13session1

Bielbyjuly13session2

Bielbyjuly13session3Bielbyjuly13session4

To all the willful participants, that is Justices and lawyers named for whom all conspired to defraud two innocent 75 year old senior citizens we have reported this crime to the authorities and report that Joyce M. Broder was persecuted and defrauded of her retirement pension with garnishes imposed at her bank account at the Alberta Treasury Branch in Sundre, Alberta while she succumbed to complication from Dementia and Alzheimer.

Joyce Broder at the Good Samaritans Lodge

On the morning of September 23, 2011 Joyce M. Broder was rushed from the Good Samaritans Care Center in Stoney Plain, Alberta

to the local hospital where she passed away later that day.

Donald H. Broder and Craig Broder were ordered to be in Court in Calgary the morning of September 23, 2011 being threatened once again with contempt of Court for not filling out form 13 of the civil enforcement act declaring and listing everything they own and received the call from family upon leaving the Calgary Court Center being informed of the situation.

Donald H. Broder made all efforts to be with his wife but she passed away before he could get there.

DBTUX

Donald H. Broder was an honest and sincere man being driven to expose the dishonesty of lawyers and Judges.

He not only exposed the corruption within the Alberta Justice Department, Justices and lawyers to the world, he did it for you the reader.

Donald H. Broder stood for democracy and freedom for all.

One of verbal life lessons  he instilled on his children was;

” I never got into trouble until I hired a lawyer and never got out of trouble until I fired the son of a *****!”

Donald H. Broder succumbed to complications from a heart valve replacement finally causing kidney failure

and passed away on April 11, 2012.

memories6

To Alison Redford for whom has allowed all the Justices, lawyers and law firms named within the

Alberta Justice System for whom all played roles to orchestrated  a

Conspiracy to Defraud  innocent senior citizen’s;

Donald H. Broder while he was caring for his wife Joyce M Broder for whom was suffering with Alzheimer’s;

Let it be known that is

one too many!

redfordquack

We ask the Canadian people;

Now that you have been made aware of

The REDFORD FILES

Is Alison Redford a Hypocrite ?

Webster Definition; –  hyp-o-crite – one who affects virtues or qualities he or she does not have.

Exposure has conclude

Mandela’s funeral

Alison Redford
Alberta Premier Alison Redford in Vancouver on Tuesday, Aug. 14, 2012. (Darryl Dyck / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Share:

                          The Canadian Press                                       Published Wednesday, February 5, 2014 12:37PM EST                                                      Last Updated Wednesday, February 5, 2014 3:44PM EST

OKOTOKS, Alta. — Alberta’s premier says it’s unacceptable that it cost taxpayers $45,000 for her to attend Nelson Mandela’s funeral and she wouldn’t have gone had she known the price tag.

Redford, who once worked with Mandela before she entered politics, was invited to travel with Prime Minister Stephen Harper as part of a Canadian delegation attending the former South African leader’s funeral in December. The premier’s office confirmed she travelled with an assistant.

“I’m not challenging the number. I’m surprised by the number,” she said Wednesday after making an education announcement south of Calgary. “I don’t think it was acceptable. I was disappointed. You can appreciate that it was a very fluid week and you can appreciate I’m not making my own travel arrangements in those circumstances.”

Redford took a provincial government plane to Ottawa to catch the free flight with Harper to South Africa, but she flew home early on a commercial flight at a cost of $10,000 to attend the swearing-in of her new cabinet.

“I have to say that if, at that point of time, we had understood … what some of those actual costs were going to turn out to be, and also how fluid the prime minister’s schedule was, I think I would have chosen not to go,” Redford said.

Opposition leaders have noted that Nova Scotia Premier Stephen McNeil billed taxpayers less than $1,000 to go to the funeral.

They say Redford’s lavish spending on travel abroad shows contempt for taxpayers.

Wildrose critic Rob Anderson said Wednesday that Redford ought to have known the cost of her trip, or at least could’ve taken a good guess.

“One might ask how the premier didn’t know taking a private jet to Ottawa wouldn’t be expensive,” said Anderson, who added that Redford needs to pay the money back.

He said the trip, along with Redford’s recent $120,000 journey to India and Switzerland, suggests she has delusions of royalty.

“She obviously thinks she’s the Queen of England. There’s some kind of an identity crisis going on here. She’s not. She’s the premier of Alberta,” he said. “She needs to start showing respect for the taxpayers that she represents and spends the money from.”

Redford has also been criticized since the release of her government’s list of public-sector employees who make more than $100,000 a year,

Redford’s chief of staff, Farouk Adatia, led the way on the political side, pulling in more than $357,000 in salary and benefits in 2013.

Peter Watson, the top civil servant who works for Redford’s cabinet, was the top money-earner among mandarins at $342,000 in base salary.

The numbers showed that deputy ministers — the top civil servants in each department — earned salaries ranging in the low $200,000s to just over $300,000.

“Quite frankly it is important to compensate people appropriately. I’m not going to get into negotiating or discussing individual contracts,” Redford said .

“It’s a very competitive economy in Alberta. People are well compensated. Many of the people who work in the government of Alberta are paid more than in other jurisdictions across the country and that will continue.”

Read more: http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/alison-redford-surprised-by-45k-cost-of-attending-mandela-s-funeral-1.1671686#ixzz2skmMjTHJ

Donald H. Broder accepted blame for Alison Redford’s delusions of Royalty because in 2010 he was guilty of filing

Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action No: 1003-16312.

DONALD H. BRODER    –    Plaintiff

-and –

                                 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ALBERTA   –  Defendant

 and served it upon;

Alison Redford – Attorney General / Justice Minister of Alberta a the time.

Subsequent to serving Alison Redford with the Statement of Claim

Donald H. Broder filed a Summary Judgement Application within the said action with

his supporting Affidavit and relevant documents listed as exhibits.

In conclusion of this page within;

  The Buck For Justice Website

Provided below is a scanned copy of;

Donald H. Broder’s final – Affidavit sworn the 14 day of December 2010.

DBaffidavitpg1

*******************************************************

DBaffidavitpg2

********************************************************

DBaffidavitpg3

*****************************************************

DBaffidavitpg4

*****************************************************

DBaffidavitpg5

**********************************************

DBaffidavitpg6

****************************************************

DBaffidavitpg7

*******************************************************

DBaffidavitpg8

************************************************

DBaffidavitpg9

**************************************************

DBaffidavitpg10

****************************************************

DBaffidavitpg11

************************************************

DBaffidavitpg12

******************************************************

DBaffidavitpg13

*******************************************************

DBaffidavitpg14

*******************************************************

DBaffidavitpg15

************************************************

DBaffidavitpg16

Alison Redford – Attorney General / Justice Minster of Alberta immediately had her office file for a Summary Dismissal for which was heard by;

Master Smart for whom scheduled a conference call informing Donald H. Broder that the Alison Redford  – Summary Dismissal Application

would be argued first and in the event it was not successful then the

Donald H. Broder – Summary Judgement Application would be heard.

Master Smart heard the Alison Redford – Summary Dismissal Application of Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action No: 1003-16312

and dismissed Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Action No: 1003-16312

then went on to tell  Donald H. Broder;

To quit blaming The Crown for what other had done to him!

Donald H. Broder passed away on April 11, 2012;

predeceased by his wife for whom was in a long term care facility since March, 2008

Didsbury then Breton, Alberta finally being moved closer to family to her final home where

she lived her final days at The Good Samaritans Care Center in Stony Plain, Alberta

being diagnosed and suffering with Alzheimer’s and Dementia.

Joyce Broder at the Good Samaritans Lodge

Joyce M. Broder  passed away on September 23, 2011

with her bank accounts garnished,

without ever being exonerated and refunded her pension money

that had been garnisheed from her bank account by

The Alberta Justice Department

therefore depleting her pension funds

and preventing  her ability to pay

The Good Samaritans Care Facility in Stony Plain, Alberta

for which was providing long term care

as she slowly passed away from complication from

Alzheimer’s and Dementia.

The Alison Redford 

 leader of

The Alberta Justice Departments

purposeful and willful actions of denying

 Donald H. Broder and Joyce M Broder, 

Children and Grandchildren of their 

Constitutional Rights. 

joyce and don

Alison Redford – Attorney General / Justice Minister

  The Alberta Justice Department was a direct cause of their suffering, loss of will to live and then eventually death.

And you, Alison Redford attended;

Nelson Mandela’s funeral!

What a Hypocrite!

Webster Definition; –  hyp-o-crite – one who affects virtues or qualities he or she does not have.

Figure that one out!

 © 2011-2012 Broder Buck All Rights Reserved

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No comments

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Contact us: info@broderbuck.com
Copyright © 2016 - 2017 Broder Buck. All Rights Reserved. Created by Blog Copyright.

Copyright © 2016 - 2017 Broder Buck. All Rights Reserved. Created by Blog Copyright.